Cargando…

Evaluation of a whole process management model based on an information system for cancer patients with pain: A prospective nonrandomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of whole process management model interventions based on information system benefits reported by patients with cancer pain. METHODS: We performed a quantitative, prospective nonrandomized controlled design from June to October 2020. A tota...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Hong, Yu, Wenhua, Zhang, Hong, Heng, Fanxiu, Ma, Xiaoxiao, Li, Na, Wang, Zhanying, Hou, Xiaoting, Guo, Renxiu, Lu, Yuhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35529411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2021.12.017
_version_ 1784700999675412480
author Yang, Hong
Yu, Wenhua
Zhang, Hong
Heng, Fanxiu
Ma, Xiaoxiao
Li, Na
Wang, Zhanying
Hou, Xiaoting
Guo, Renxiu
Lu, Yuhan
author_facet Yang, Hong
Yu, Wenhua
Zhang, Hong
Heng, Fanxiu
Ma, Xiaoxiao
Li, Na
Wang, Zhanying
Hou, Xiaoting
Guo, Renxiu
Lu, Yuhan
author_sort Yang, Hong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of whole process management model interventions based on information system benefits reported by patients with cancer pain. METHODS: We performed a quantitative, prospective nonrandomized controlled design from June to October 2020. A total of 124 cancer patients with pain were enrolled. Patients in the experimental group received a whole process management model intervention based on an information system compared to the control group who received routine cancer pain management. Data were collected at baseline and after a four-week follow-up, acting as a test-retest control. The primary outcome was pain management quality, which was measured using the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Chinese version (APS-POQ-C). Secondary outcomes were patient-related attitudinal barriers and analgesic adherence. The Barrier Questionnaire (BQ) and a single-item questionnaire were used. Chi-square tests were used to compare the pain intensity and analgesic adherence, independent sample t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were performed to test the differences in the pain management quality and patient-related attitudinal barriers between control and experimental groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and outcomes of the participants did not differ significantly (P ​> ​0.05). Primary outcomes were changes in four aspect of the quality of pain management (APS-POQ-C) between the two groups (P ​< ​0.05). Patients in the whole process management group reported significantly better pain control and perception of care than the control group. With respect to secondary endpoints, a significant difference in favor of the experimental group was found for barriers (P ​< ​0.05) and medication adherence (60.0% vs. 40.0%; P ​< ​0.05) after the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The whole process management of patients with cancer pain effectively improves patient-reported quality of pain management, reduces patient-perceived barriers, enhances patient adherence to analgesic drugs and is worthy of clinical application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9072170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90721702022-05-07 Evaluation of a whole process management model based on an information system for cancer patients with pain: A prospective nonrandomized controlled study Yang, Hong Yu, Wenhua Zhang, Hong Heng, Fanxiu Ma, Xiaoxiao Li, Na Wang, Zhanying Hou, Xiaoting Guo, Renxiu Lu, Yuhan Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of whole process management model interventions based on information system benefits reported by patients with cancer pain. METHODS: We performed a quantitative, prospective nonrandomized controlled design from June to October 2020. A total of 124 cancer patients with pain were enrolled. Patients in the experimental group received a whole process management model intervention based on an information system compared to the control group who received routine cancer pain management. Data were collected at baseline and after a four-week follow-up, acting as a test-retest control. The primary outcome was pain management quality, which was measured using the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Chinese version (APS-POQ-C). Secondary outcomes were patient-related attitudinal barriers and analgesic adherence. The Barrier Questionnaire (BQ) and a single-item questionnaire were used. Chi-square tests were used to compare the pain intensity and analgesic adherence, independent sample t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were performed to test the differences in the pain management quality and patient-related attitudinal barriers between control and experimental groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and outcomes of the participants did not differ significantly (P ​> ​0.05). Primary outcomes were changes in four aspect of the quality of pain management (APS-POQ-C) between the two groups (P ​< ​0.05). Patients in the whole process management group reported significantly better pain control and perception of care than the control group. With respect to secondary endpoints, a significant difference in favor of the experimental group was found for barriers (P ​< ​0.05) and medication adherence (60.0% vs. 40.0%; P ​< ​0.05) after the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The whole process management of patients with cancer pain effectively improves patient-reported quality of pain management, reduces patient-perceived barriers, enhances patient adherence to analgesic drugs and is worthy of clinical application. Elsevier 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9072170/ /pubmed/35529411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2021.12.017 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Yang, Hong
Yu, Wenhua
Zhang, Hong
Heng, Fanxiu
Ma, Xiaoxiao
Li, Na
Wang, Zhanying
Hou, Xiaoting
Guo, Renxiu
Lu, Yuhan
Evaluation of a whole process management model based on an information system for cancer patients with pain: A prospective nonrandomized controlled study
title Evaluation of a whole process management model based on an information system for cancer patients with pain: A prospective nonrandomized controlled study
title_full Evaluation of a whole process management model based on an information system for cancer patients with pain: A prospective nonrandomized controlled study
title_fullStr Evaluation of a whole process management model based on an information system for cancer patients with pain: A prospective nonrandomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a whole process management model based on an information system for cancer patients with pain: A prospective nonrandomized controlled study
title_short Evaluation of a whole process management model based on an information system for cancer patients with pain: A prospective nonrandomized controlled study
title_sort evaluation of a whole process management model based on an information system for cancer patients with pain: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35529411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2021.12.017
work_keys_str_mv AT yanghong evaluationofawholeprocessmanagementmodelbasedonaninformationsystemforcancerpatientswithpainaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yuwenhua evaluationofawholeprocessmanagementmodelbasedonaninformationsystemforcancerpatientswithpainaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT zhanghong evaluationofawholeprocessmanagementmodelbasedonaninformationsystemforcancerpatientswithpainaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hengfanxiu evaluationofawholeprocessmanagementmodelbasedonaninformationsystemforcancerpatientswithpainaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT maxiaoxiao evaluationofawholeprocessmanagementmodelbasedonaninformationsystemforcancerpatientswithpainaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lina evaluationofawholeprocessmanagementmodelbasedonaninformationsystemforcancerpatientswithpainaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT wangzhanying evaluationofawholeprocessmanagementmodelbasedonaninformationsystemforcancerpatientswithpainaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT houxiaoting evaluationofawholeprocessmanagementmodelbasedonaninformationsystemforcancerpatientswithpainaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT guorenxiu evaluationofawholeprocessmanagementmodelbasedonaninformationsystemforcancerpatientswithpainaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT luyuhan evaluationofawholeprocessmanagementmodelbasedonaninformationsystemforcancerpatientswithpainaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy