Cargando…

Automated alternate cover test for ‘HINTS’ assessment: a validation study

OBJECTIVE: The alternate cover test (ACT) in patients with acute vestibular syndrome is part of the ‘HINTS’ battery test. Although quantitative, the ACT is highly dependent on the examiner’s experience and could theoretically vary greatly between examiners. In this study, we sought to validate an au...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morrison, Miranda, Kerkeni, Hassen, Korda, Athanasia, Räss , Simone, Caversaccio, Marco D., Abegg, Mathias, Schneider, Erich, Mantokoudis, Georgios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34302212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06998-w
_version_ 1784701023730794496
author Morrison, Miranda
Kerkeni, Hassen
Korda, Athanasia
Räss , Simone
Caversaccio, Marco D.
Abegg, Mathias
Schneider, Erich
Mantokoudis, Georgios
author_facet Morrison, Miranda
Kerkeni, Hassen
Korda, Athanasia
Räss , Simone
Caversaccio, Marco D.
Abegg, Mathias
Schneider, Erich
Mantokoudis, Georgios
author_sort Morrison, Miranda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The alternate cover test (ACT) in patients with acute vestibular syndrome is part of the ‘HINTS’ battery test. Although quantitative, the ACT is highly dependent on the examiner’s experience and could theoretically vary greatly between examiners. In this study, we sought to validate an automated video-oculography (VOG) system based on eye tracking and dedicated glasses. METHODS: We artificially induced a vertical strabismus to simulate a skew deviation on ten healthy subjects, aged from 26 to 66, using different press-on Fresnel prisms on one eye while recording eye position with VOG of the contralateral eye. We then compared the system’s performance to that of a blinded trained orthoptist using conventional, semi-quantitative method of skew measurement known as the alternate prism cover test (APCT) as a gold standard. RESULTS: We found a significant correlation between the reference APCT and the Skew VOG (Pearson’s R(2) = 0.606, p < 0.05). There was a good agreement between the two tests (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.852, 95 CI 0.728–0.917, p < 0.001). The overall accuracy of the VOG was estimated at 80.53% with an error rate of 19.46%. There was no significant difference in VOG skew estimations compared with the gold standard except for very small skews. CONCLUSIONS: VOG offers an objective and quantitative skew measurement and proved to be accurate in measuring vertical eye misalignment compared to the ACT with prisms. Precision was moderate, which mandates a sufficient number of tests per subject. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-06998-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9072275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90722752022-05-07 Automated alternate cover test for ‘HINTS’ assessment: a validation study Morrison, Miranda Kerkeni, Hassen Korda, Athanasia Räss , Simone Caversaccio, Marco D. Abegg, Mathias Schneider, Erich Mantokoudis, Georgios Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology OBJECTIVE: The alternate cover test (ACT) in patients with acute vestibular syndrome is part of the ‘HINTS’ battery test. Although quantitative, the ACT is highly dependent on the examiner’s experience and could theoretically vary greatly between examiners. In this study, we sought to validate an automated video-oculography (VOG) system based on eye tracking and dedicated glasses. METHODS: We artificially induced a vertical strabismus to simulate a skew deviation on ten healthy subjects, aged from 26 to 66, using different press-on Fresnel prisms on one eye while recording eye position with VOG of the contralateral eye. We then compared the system’s performance to that of a blinded trained orthoptist using conventional, semi-quantitative method of skew measurement known as the alternate prism cover test (APCT) as a gold standard. RESULTS: We found a significant correlation between the reference APCT and the Skew VOG (Pearson’s R(2) = 0.606, p < 0.05). There was a good agreement between the two tests (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.852, 95 CI 0.728–0.917, p < 0.001). The overall accuracy of the VOG was estimated at 80.53% with an error rate of 19.46%. There was no significant difference in VOG skew estimations compared with the gold standard except for very small skews. CONCLUSIONS: VOG offers an objective and quantitative skew measurement and proved to be accurate in measuring vertical eye misalignment compared to the ACT with prisms. Precision was moderate, which mandates a sufficient number of tests per subject. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-06998-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9072275/ /pubmed/34302212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06998-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Otology
Morrison, Miranda
Kerkeni, Hassen
Korda, Athanasia
Räss , Simone
Caversaccio, Marco D.
Abegg, Mathias
Schneider, Erich
Mantokoudis, Georgios
Automated alternate cover test for ‘HINTS’ assessment: a validation study
title Automated alternate cover test for ‘HINTS’ assessment: a validation study
title_full Automated alternate cover test for ‘HINTS’ assessment: a validation study
title_fullStr Automated alternate cover test for ‘HINTS’ assessment: a validation study
title_full_unstemmed Automated alternate cover test for ‘HINTS’ assessment: a validation study
title_short Automated alternate cover test for ‘HINTS’ assessment: a validation study
title_sort automated alternate cover test for ‘hints’ assessment: a validation study
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34302212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06998-w
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisonmiranda automatedalternatecovertestforhintsassessmentavalidationstudy
AT kerkenihassen automatedalternatecovertestforhintsassessmentavalidationstudy
AT kordaathanasia automatedalternatecovertestforhintsassessmentavalidationstudy
AT rasssimone automatedalternatecovertestforhintsassessmentavalidationstudy
AT caversacciomarcod automatedalternatecovertestforhintsassessmentavalidationstudy
AT abeggmathias automatedalternatecovertestforhintsassessmentavalidationstudy
AT schneidererich automatedalternatecovertestforhintsassessmentavalidationstudy
AT mantokoudisgeorgios automatedalternatecovertestforhintsassessmentavalidationstudy