Cargando…

Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be reliably diagnosed at 18 months, yet significant diagnostic delays persist in the United States. This double-blinded, multi-site, prospective, active comparator cohort study tested the accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based Software as a Medical Device des...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Megerian, Jonathan T., Dey, Sangeeta, Melmed, Raun D., Coury, Daniel L., Lerner, Marc, Nicholls, Christopher J., Sohl, Kristin, Rouhbakhsh, Rambod, Narasimhan, Anandhi, Romain, Jonathan, Golla, Sailaja, Shareef, Safiullah, Ostrovsky, Andrey, Shannon, Jennifer, Kraft, Colleen, Liu-Mayo, Stuart, Abbas, Halim, Gal-Szabo, Diana E., Wall, Dennis P., Taraman, Sharief
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00598-6
_version_ 1784701036811780096
author Megerian, Jonathan T.
Dey, Sangeeta
Melmed, Raun D.
Coury, Daniel L.
Lerner, Marc
Nicholls, Christopher J.
Sohl, Kristin
Rouhbakhsh, Rambod
Narasimhan, Anandhi
Romain, Jonathan
Golla, Sailaja
Shareef, Safiullah
Ostrovsky, Andrey
Shannon, Jennifer
Kraft, Colleen
Liu-Mayo, Stuart
Abbas, Halim
Gal-Szabo, Diana E.
Wall, Dennis P.
Taraman, Sharief
author_facet Megerian, Jonathan T.
Dey, Sangeeta
Melmed, Raun D.
Coury, Daniel L.
Lerner, Marc
Nicholls, Christopher J.
Sohl, Kristin
Rouhbakhsh, Rambod
Narasimhan, Anandhi
Romain, Jonathan
Golla, Sailaja
Shareef, Safiullah
Ostrovsky, Andrey
Shannon, Jennifer
Kraft, Colleen
Liu-Mayo, Stuart
Abbas, Halim
Gal-Szabo, Diana E.
Wall, Dennis P.
Taraman, Sharief
author_sort Megerian, Jonathan T.
collection PubMed
description Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be reliably diagnosed at 18 months, yet significant diagnostic delays persist in the United States. This double-blinded, multi-site, prospective, active comparator cohort study tested the accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based Software as a Medical Device designed to aid primary care healthcare providers (HCPs) in diagnosing ASD. The Device combines behavioral features from three distinct inputs (a caregiver questionnaire, analysis of two short home videos, and an HCP questionnaire) in a gradient boosted decision tree machine learning algorithm to produce either an ASD positive, ASD negative, or indeterminate output. This study compared Device outputs to diagnostic agreement by two or more independent specialists in a cohort of 18–72-month-olds with developmental delay concerns (425 study completers, 36% female, 29% ASD prevalence). Device output PPV for all study completers was 80.8% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 70.3%–88.8%) and NPV was 98.3% (90.6%–100%). For the 31.8% of participants who received a determinate output (ASD positive or negative) Device sensitivity was 98.4% (91.6%–100%) and specificity was 78.9% (67.6%–87.7%). The Device’s indeterminate output acts as a risk control measure when inputs are insufficiently granular to make a determinate recommendation with confidence. If this risk control measure were removed, the sensitivity for all study completers would fall to 51.6% (63/122) (95% CI 42.4%, 60.8%), and specificity would fall to 18.5% (56/303) (95% CI 14.3%, 23.3%). Among participants for whom the Device abstained from providing a result, specialists identified that 91% had one or more complex neurodevelopmental disorders. No significant differences in Device performance were found across participants’ sex, race/ethnicity, income, or education level. For nearly a third of this primary care sample, the Device enabled timely diagnostic evaluation with a high degree of accuracy. The Device shows promise to significantly increase the number of children able to be diagnosed with ASD in a primary care setting, potentially facilitating earlier intervention and more efficient use of specialist resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9072329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90723292022-05-07 Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder Megerian, Jonathan T. Dey, Sangeeta Melmed, Raun D. Coury, Daniel L. Lerner, Marc Nicholls, Christopher J. Sohl, Kristin Rouhbakhsh, Rambod Narasimhan, Anandhi Romain, Jonathan Golla, Sailaja Shareef, Safiullah Ostrovsky, Andrey Shannon, Jennifer Kraft, Colleen Liu-Mayo, Stuart Abbas, Halim Gal-Szabo, Diana E. Wall, Dennis P. Taraman, Sharief NPJ Digit Med Article Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be reliably diagnosed at 18 months, yet significant diagnostic delays persist in the United States. This double-blinded, multi-site, prospective, active comparator cohort study tested the accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based Software as a Medical Device designed to aid primary care healthcare providers (HCPs) in diagnosing ASD. The Device combines behavioral features from three distinct inputs (a caregiver questionnaire, analysis of two short home videos, and an HCP questionnaire) in a gradient boosted decision tree machine learning algorithm to produce either an ASD positive, ASD negative, or indeterminate output. This study compared Device outputs to diagnostic agreement by two or more independent specialists in a cohort of 18–72-month-olds with developmental delay concerns (425 study completers, 36% female, 29% ASD prevalence). Device output PPV for all study completers was 80.8% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 70.3%–88.8%) and NPV was 98.3% (90.6%–100%). For the 31.8% of participants who received a determinate output (ASD positive or negative) Device sensitivity was 98.4% (91.6%–100%) and specificity was 78.9% (67.6%–87.7%). The Device’s indeterminate output acts as a risk control measure when inputs are insufficiently granular to make a determinate recommendation with confidence. If this risk control measure were removed, the sensitivity for all study completers would fall to 51.6% (63/122) (95% CI 42.4%, 60.8%), and specificity would fall to 18.5% (56/303) (95% CI 14.3%, 23.3%). Among participants for whom the Device abstained from providing a result, specialists identified that 91% had one or more complex neurodevelopmental disorders. No significant differences in Device performance were found across participants’ sex, race/ethnicity, income, or education level. For nearly a third of this primary care sample, the Device enabled timely diagnostic evaluation with a high degree of accuracy. The Device shows promise to significantly increase the number of children able to be diagnosed with ASD in a primary care setting, potentially facilitating earlier intervention and more efficient use of specialist resources. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9072329/ /pubmed/35513550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00598-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Megerian, Jonathan T.
Dey, Sangeeta
Melmed, Raun D.
Coury, Daniel L.
Lerner, Marc
Nicholls, Christopher J.
Sohl, Kristin
Rouhbakhsh, Rambod
Narasimhan, Anandhi
Romain, Jonathan
Golla, Sailaja
Shareef, Safiullah
Ostrovsky, Andrey
Shannon, Jennifer
Kraft, Colleen
Liu-Mayo, Stuart
Abbas, Halim
Gal-Szabo, Diana E.
Wall, Dennis P.
Taraman, Sharief
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
title Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
title_full Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
title_fullStr Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
title_short Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
title_sort evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00598-6
work_keys_str_mv AT megerianjonathant evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT deysangeeta evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT melmedraund evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT courydaniell evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT lernermarc evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT nichollschristopherj evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT sohlkristin evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT rouhbakhshrambod evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT narasimhananandhi evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT romainjonathan evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT gollasailaja evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT shareefsafiullah evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT ostrovskyandrey evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT shannonjennifer evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT kraftcolleen evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT liumayostuart evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT abbashalim evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT galszabodianae evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT walldennisp evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT taramansharief evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder