Cargando…
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be reliably diagnosed at 18 months, yet significant diagnostic delays persist in the United States. This double-blinded, multi-site, prospective, active comparator cohort study tested the accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based Software as a Medical Device des...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00598-6 |
_version_ | 1784701036811780096 |
---|---|
author | Megerian, Jonathan T. Dey, Sangeeta Melmed, Raun D. Coury, Daniel L. Lerner, Marc Nicholls, Christopher J. Sohl, Kristin Rouhbakhsh, Rambod Narasimhan, Anandhi Romain, Jonathan Golla, Sailaja Shareef, Safiullah Ostrovsky, Andrey Shannon, Jennifer Kraft, Colleen Liu-Mayo, Stuart Abbas, Halim Gal-Szabo, Diana E. Wall, Dennis P. Taraman, Sharief |
author_facet | Megerian, Jonathan T. Dey, Sangeeta Melmed, Raun D. Coury, Daniel L. Lerner, Marc Nicholls, Christopher J. Sohl, Kristin Rouhbakhsh, Rambod Narasimhan, Anandhi Romain, Jonathan Golla, Sailaja Shareef, Safiullah Ostrovsky, Andrey Shannon, Jennifer Kraft, Colleen Liu-Mayo, Stuart Abbas, Halim Gal-Szabo, Diana E. Wall, Dennis P. Taraman, Sharief |
author_sort | Megerian, Jonathan T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be reliably diagnosed at 18 months, yet significant diagnostic delays persist in the United States. This double-blinded, multi-site, prospective, active comparator cohort study tested the accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based Software as a Medical Device designed to aid primary care healthcare providers (HCPs) in diagnosing ASD. The Device combines behavioral features from three distinct inputs (a caregiver questionnaire, analysis of two short home videos, and an HCP questionnaire) in a gradient boosted decision tree machine learning algorithm to produce either an ASD positive, ASD negative, or indeterminate output. This study compared Device outputs to diagnostic agreement by two or more independent specialists in a cohort of 18–72-month-olds with developmental delay concerns (425 study completers, 36% female, 29% ASD prevalence). Device output PPV for all study completers was 80.8% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 70.3%–88.8%) and NPV was 98.3% (90.6%–100%). For the 31.8% of participants who received a determinate output (ASD positive or negative) Device sensitivity was 98.4% (91.6%–100%) and specificity was 78.9% (67.6%–87.7%). The Device’s indeterminate output acts as a risk control measure when inputs are insufficiently granular to make a determinate recommendation with confidence. If this risk control measure were removed, the sensitivity for all study completers would fall to 51.6% (63/122) (95% CI 42.4%, 60.8%), and specificity would fall to 18.5% (56/303) (95% CI 14.3%, 23.3%). Among participants for whom the Device abstained from providing a result, specialists identified that 91% had one or more complex neurodevelopmental disorders. No significant differences in Device performance were found across participants’ sex, race/ethnicity, income, or education level. For nearly a third of this primary care sample, the Device enabled timely diagnostic evaluation with a high degree of accuracy. The Device shows promise to significantly increase the number of children able to be diagnosed with ASD in a primary care setting, potentially facilitating earlier intervention and more efficient use of specialist resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9072329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90723292022-05-07 Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder Megerian, Jonathan T. Dey, Sangeeta Melmed, Raun D. Coury, Daniel L. Lerner, Marc Nicholls, Christopher J. Sohl, Kristin Rouhbakhsh, Rambod Narasimhan, Anandhi Romain, Jonathan Golla, Sailaja Shareef, Safiullah Ostrovsky, Andrey Shannon, Jennifer Kraft, Colleen Liu-Mayo, Stuart Abbas, Halim Gal-Szabo, Diana E. Wall, Dennis P. Taraman, Sharief NPJ Digit Med Article Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be reliably diagnosed at 18 months, yet significant diagnostic delays persist in the United States. This double-blinded, multi-site, prospective, active comparator cohort study tested the accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based Software as a Medical Device designed to aid primary care healthcare providers (HCPs) in diagnosing ASD. The Device combines behavioral features from three distinct inputs (a caregiver questionnaire, analysis of two short home videos, and an HCP questionnaire) in a gradient boosted decision tree machine learning algorithm to produce either an ASD positive, ASD negative, or indeterminate output. This study compared Device outputs to diagnostic agreement by two or more independent specialists in a cohort of 18–72-month-olds with developmental delay concerns (425 study completers, 36% female, 29% ASD prevalence). Device output PPV for all study completers was 80.8% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 70.3%–88.8%) and NPV was 98.3% (90.6%–100%). For the 31.8% of participants who received a determinate output (ASD positive or negative) Device sensitivity was 98.4% (91.6%–100%) and specificity was 78.9% (67.6%–87.7%). The Device’s indeterminate output acts as a risk control measure when inputs are insufficiently granular to make a determinate recommendation with confidence. If this risk control measure were removed, the sensitivity for all study completers would fall to 51.6% (63/122) (95% CI 42.4%, 60.8%), and specificity would fall to 18.5% (56/303) (95% CI 14.3%, 23.3%). Among participants for whom the Device abstained from providing a result, specialists identified that 91% had one or more complex neurodevelopmental disorders. No significant differences in Device performance were found across participants’ sex, race/ethnicity, income, or education level. For nearly a third of this primary care sample, the Device enabled timely diagnostic evaluation with a high degree of accuracy. The Device shows promise to significantly increase the number of children able to be diagnosed with ASD in a primary care setting, potentially facilitating earlier intervention and more efficient use of specialist resources. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9072329/ /pubmed/35513550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00598-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Megerian, Jonathan T. Dey, Sangeeta Melmed, Raun D. Coury, Daniel L. Lerner, Marc Nicholls, Christopher J. Sohl, Kristin Rouhbakhsh, Rambod Narasimhan, Anandhi Romain, Jonathan Golla, Sailaja Shareef, Safiullah Ostrovsky, Andrey Shannon, Jennifer Kraft, Colleen Liu-Mayo, Stuart Abbas, Halim Gal-Szabo, Diana E. Wall, Dennis P. Taraman, Sharief Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder |
title | Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder |
title_full | Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder |
title_short | Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder |
title_sort | evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00598-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT megerianjonathant evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT deysangeeta evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT melmedraund evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT courydaniell evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT lernermarc evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT nichollschristopherj evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT sohlkristin evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT rouhbakhshrambod evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT narasimhananandhi evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT romainjonathan evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT gollasailaja evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT shareefsafiullah evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT ostrovskyandrey evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT shannonjennifer evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT kraftcolleen evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT liumayostuart evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT abbashalim evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT galszabodianae evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT walldennisp evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT taramansharief evaluationofanartificialintelligencebasedmedicaldevicefordiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder |