Cargando…

Comparative optimization of combinatorial CRISPR screens

Combinatorial CRISPR technologies have emerged as a transformative approach to systematically probe genetic interactions and dependencies of redundant gene pairs. However, the performance of different functional genomic tools for multiplexing sgRNAs vary widely. Here, we generate and benchmark ten d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ruitong, Klingbeil, Olaf, Monducci, Davide, Young, Michael J., Rodriguez, Diego J., Bayyat, Zaid, Dempster, Joshua M., Kesar, Devishi, Yang, Xiaoping, Zamanighomi, Mahdi, Vakoc, Christopher R., Ito, Takahiro, Sellers, William R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30196-9
_version_ 1784701061126160384
author Li, Ruitong
Klingbeil, Olaf
Monducci, Davide
Young, Michael J.
Rodriguez, Diego J.
Bayyat, Zaid
Dempster, Joshua M.
Kesar, Devishi
Yang, Xiaoping
Zamanighomi, Mahdi
Vakoc, Christopher R.
Ito, Takahiro
Sellers, William R.
author_facet Li, Ruitong
Klingbeil, Olaf
Monducci, Davide
Young, Michael J.
Rodriguez, Diego J.
Bayyat, Zaid
Dempster, Joshua M.
Kesar, Devishi
Yang, Xiaoping
Zamanighomi, Mahdi
Vakoc, Christopher R.
Ito, Takahiro
Sellers, William R.
author_sort Li, Ruitong
collection PubMed
description Combinatorial CRISPR technologies have emerged as a transformative approach to systematically probe genetic interactions and dependencies of redundant gene pairs. However, the performance of different functional genomic tools for multiplexing sgRNAs vary widely. Here, we generate and benchmark ten distinct pooled combinatorial CRISPR libraries targeting paralog pairs to optimize digenic knockout screens. Libraries composed of dual Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (spCas9), orthogonal spCas9 and Staphylococcus aureus (saCas9), and enhanced Cas12a from Acidaminococcus were evaluated. We demonstrate a combination of alternative tracrRNA sequences from spCas9 consistently show superior effect size and positional balance between the sgRNAs as a robust combinatorial approach to profile genetic interactions of multiple genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9072436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90724362022-05-07 Comparative optimization of combinatorial CRISPR screens Li, Ruitong Klingbeil, Olaf Monducci, Davide Young, Michael J. Rodriguez, Diego J. Bayyat, Zaid Dempster, Joshua M. Kesar, Devishi Yang, Xiaoping Zamanighomi, Mahdi Vakoc, Christopher R. Ito, Takahiro Sellers, William R. Nat Commun Article Combinatorial CRISPR technologies have emerged as a transformative approach to systematically probe genetic interactions and dependencies of redundant gene pairs. However, the performance of different functional genomic tools for multiplexing sgRNAs vary widely. Here, we generate and benchmark ten distinct pooled combinatorial CRISPR libraries targeting paralog pairs to optimize digenic knockout screens. Libraries composed of dual Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (spCas9), orthogonal spCas9 and Staphylococcus aureus (saCas9), and enhanced Cas12a from Acidaminococcus were evaluated. We demonstrate a combination of alternative tracrRNA sequences from spCas9 consistently show superior effect size and positional balance between the sgRNAs as a robust combinatorial approach to profile genetic interactions of multiple genes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9072436/ /pubmed/35513429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30196-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Li, Ruitong
Klingbeil, Olaf
Monducci, Davide
Young, Michael J.
Rodriguez, Diego J.
Bayyat, Zaid
Dempster, Joshua M.
Kesar, Devishi
Yang, Xiaoping
Zamanighomi, Mahdi
Vakoc, Christopher R.
Ito, Takahiro
Sellers, William R.
Comparative optimization of combinatorial CRISPR screens
title Comparative optimization of combinatorial CRISPR screens
title_full Comparative optimization of combinatorial CRISPR screens
title_fullStr Comparative optimization of combinatorial CRISPR screens
title_full_unstemmed Comparative optimization of combinatorial CRISPR screens
title_short Comparative optimization of combinatorial CRISPR screens
title_sort comparative optimization of combinatorial crispr screens
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30196-9
work_keys_str_mv AT liruitong comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens
AT klingbeilolaf comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens
AT monduccidavide comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens
AT youngmichaelj comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens
AT rodriguezdiegoj comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens
AT bayyatzaid comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens
AT dempsterjoshuam comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens
AT kesardevishi comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens
AT yangxiaoping comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens
AT zamanighomimahdi comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens
AT vakocchristopherr comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens
AT itotakahiro comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens
AT sellerswilliamr comparativeoptimizationofcombinatorialcrisprscreens