Cargando…

The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system

PURPOSES: To investigate the effects for Ultra 3D cochlear implant (CI) positioning on MR imaging quality, looking at a comprehensive description of intracranial structures in cases of unilateral and bilateral CI placement. METHODS: Four CI angular positions (90°, 120°, 135° and 160°) at 9 cm distan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Canzi, Pietro, Magnetto, Marianna, Simoncelli, Anna, Manfrin, Marco, Aprile, Federico, Lafe, Elvis, Carlotto, Elena, Avato, Irene, Scribante, Andrea, Preda, Lorenzo, Benazzo, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07005-y
_version_ 1784701064112504832
author Canzi, Pietro
Magnetto, Marianna
Simoncelli, Anna
Manfrin, Marco
Aprile, Federico
Lafe, Elvis
Carlotto, Elena
Avato, Irene
Scribante, Andrea
Preda, Lorenzo
Benazzo, Marco
author_facet Canzi, Pietro
Magnetto, Marianna
Simoncelli, Anna
Manfrin, Marco
Aprile, Federico
Lafe, Elvis
Carlotto, Elena
Avato, Irene
Scribante, Andrea
Preda, Lorenzo
Benazzo, Marco
author_sort Canzi, Pietro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSES: To investigate the effects for Ultra 3D cochlear implant (CI) positioning on MR imaging quality, looking at a comprehensive description of intracranial structures in cases of unilateral and bilateral CI placement. METHODS: Four CI angular positions (90°, 120°, 135° and 160°) at 9 cm distance from the outer-ear canal were explored. The 1.5 T MRI assessment included our institutional protocol for the investigation of brain pathologies without gadolinium application. Three investigators (two experienced neuroradiologists and one experienced otoneurosurgeon) independently evaluated the MR findings. A 4-point scale was adopted to describe 14 intracranial structures and to determine which CI positioning allowed the best image quality score and how bilateral CI placement modified MRI scan visibility. RESULTS: A high positive correlation was found between the three blinded observers. Structures situated contralateral from the CI showed high-quality values in all four placements. Structures situated ipsilaterally provided results suitable for diagnostic purposes for at least one position. At 90°, artifacts mainly involved brain structures located cranially and anteriorly (e.g., temporal lobe); on the contrary, at 160°, artifacts mostly influenced the posterior fossa structures (e.g., occipital lobe). For the bilateral CI condition, MR imaging examination revealed additional artifacts involving all structures located close to either CI, where there was a signal void/distortion area. CONCLUSIONS: Suitable unilateral CI positioning can allow the visualization of intracranial structures with sufficient visibility for diagnostic purposes. Bilateral CI positioning significantly deteriorates the anatomical visibility. CI positioning might play a crucial role for patients who need post-operative MRI surveillance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-07005-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9072450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90724502022-05-07 The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system Canzi, Pietro Magnetto, Marianna Simoncelli, Anna Manfrin, Marco Aprile, Federico Lafe, Elvis Carlotto, Elena Avato, Irene Scribante, Andrea Preda, Lorenzo Benazzo, Marco Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSES: To investigate the effects for Ultra 3D cochlear implant (CI) positioning on MR imaging quality, looking at a comprehensive description of intracranial structures in cases of unilateral and bilateral CI placement. METHODS: Four CI angular positions (90°, 120°, 135° and 160°) at 9 cm distance from the outer-ear canal were explored. The 1.5 T MRI assessment included our institutional protocol for the investigation of brain pathologies without gadolinium application. Three investigators (two experienced neuroradiologists and one experienced otoneurosurgeon) independently evaluated the MR findings. A 4-point scale was adopted to describe 14 intracranial structures and to determine which CI positioning allowed the best image quality score and how bilateral CI placement modified MRI scan visibility. RESULTS: A high positive correlation was found between the three blinded observers. Structures situated contralateral from the CI showed high-quality values in all four placements. Structures situated ipsilaterally provided results suitable for diagnostic purposes for at least one position. At 90°, artifacts mainly involved brain structures located cranially and anteriorly (e.g., temporal lobe); on the contrary, at 160°, artifacts mostly influenced the posterior fossa structures (e.g., occipital lobe). For the bilateral CI condition, MR imaging examination revealed additional artifacts involving all structures located close to either CI, where there was a signal void/distortion area. CONCLUSIONS: Suitable unilateral CI positioning can allow the visualization of intracranial structures with sufficient visibility for diagnostic purposes. Bilateral CI positioning significantly deteriorates the anatomical visibility. CI positioning might play a crucial role for patients who need post-operative MRI surveillance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-07005-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9072450/ /pubmed/34370074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07005-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Otology
Canzi, Pietro
Magnetto, Marianna
Simoncelli, Anna
Manfrin, Marco
Aprile, Federico
Lafe, Elvis
Carlotto, Elena
Avato, Irene
Scribante, Andrea
Preda, Lorenzo
Benazzo, Marco
The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system
title The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system
title_full The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system
title_fullStr The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system
title_full_unstemmed The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system
title_short The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system
title_sort role of cochlear implant positioning on mr imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07005-y
work_keys_str_mv AT canzipietro theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT magnettomarianna theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT simoncellianna theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT manfrinmarco theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT aprilefederico theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT lafeelvis theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT carlottoelena theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT avatoirene theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT scribanteandrea theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT predalorenzo theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT benazzomarco theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT canzipietro roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT magnettomarianna roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT simoncellianna roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT manfrinmarco roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT aprilefederico roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT lafeelvis roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT carlottoelena roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT avatoirene roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT scribanteandrea roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT predalorenzo roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem
AT benazzomarco roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem