Cargando…
The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system
PURPOSES: To investigate the effects for Ultra 3D cochlear implant (CI) positioning on MR imaging quality, looking at a comprehensive description of intracranial structures in cases of unilateral and bilateral CI placement. METHODS: Four CI angular positions (90°, 120°, 135° and 160°) at 9 cm distan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07005-y |
_version_ | 1784701064112504832 |
---|---|
author | Canzi, Pietro Magnetto, Marianna Simoncelli, Anna Manfrin, Marco Aprile, Federico Lafe, Elvis Carlotto, Elena Avato, Irene Scribante, Andrea Preda, Lorenzo Benazzo, Marco |
author_facet | Canzi, Pietro Magnetto, Marianna Simoncelli, Anna Manfrin, Marco Aprile, Federico Lafe, Elvis Carlotto, Elena Avato, Irene Scribante, Andrea Preda, Lorenzo Benazzo, Marco |
author_sort | Canzi, Pietro |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSES: To investigate the effects for Ultra 3D cochlear implant (CI) positioning on MR imaging quality, looking at a comprehensive description of intracranial structures in cases of unilateral and bilateral CI placement. METHODS: Four CI angular positions (90°, 120°, 135° and 160°) at 9 cm distance from the outer-ear canal were explored. The 1.5 T MRI assessment included our institutional protocol for the investigation of brain pathologies without gadolinium application. Three investigators (two experienced neuroradiologists and one experienced otoneurosurgeon) independently evaluated the MR findings. A 4-point scale was adopted to describe 14 intracranial structures and to determine which CI positioning allowed the best image quality score and how bilateral CI placement modified MRI scan visibility. RESULTS: A high positive correlation was found between the three blinded observers. Structures situated contralateral from the CI showed high-quality values in all four placements. Structures situated ipsilaterally provided results suitable for diagnostic purposes for at least one position. At 90°, artifacts mainly involved brain structures located cranially and anteriorly (e.g., temporal lobe); on the contrary, at 160°, artifacts mostly influenced the posterior fossa structures (e.g., occipital lobe). For the bilateral CI condition, MR imaging examination revealed additional artifacts involving all structures located close to either CI, where there was a signal void/distortion area. CONCLUSIONS: Suitable unilateral CI positioning can allow the visualization of intracranial structures with sufficient visibility for diagnostic purposes. Bilateral CI positioning significantly deteriorates the anatomical visibility. CI positioning might play a crucial role for patients who need post-operative MRI surveillance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-07005-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9072450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90724502022-05-07 The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system Canzi, Pietro Magnetto, Marianna Simoncelli, Anna Manfrin, Marco Aprile, Federico Lafe, Elvis Carlotto, Elena Avato, Irene Scribante, Andrea Preda, Lorenzo Benazzo, Marco Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSES: To investigate the effects for Ultra 3D cochlear implant (CI) positioning on MR imaging quality, looking at a comprehensive description of intracranial structures in cases of unilateral and bilateral CI placement. METHODS: Four CI angular positions (90°, 120°, 135° and 160°) at 9 cm distance from the outer-ear canal were explored. The 1.5 T MRI assessment included our institutional protocol for the investigation of brain pathologies without gadolinium application. Three investigators (two experienced neuroradiologists and one experienced otoneurosurgeon) independently evaluated the MR findings. A 4-point scale was adopted to describe 14 intracranial structures and to determine which CI positioning allowed the best image quality score and how bilateral CI placement modified MRI scan visibility. RESULTS: A high positive correlation was found between the three blinded observers. Structures situated contralateral from the CI showed high-quality values in all four placements. Structures situated ipsilaterally provided results suitable for diagnostic purposes for at least one position. At 90°, artifacts mainly involved brain structures located cranially and anteriorly (e.g., temporal lobe); on the contrary, at 160°, artifacts mostly influenced the posterior fossa structures (e.g., occipital lobe). For the bilateral CI condition, MR imaging examination revealed additional artifacts involving all structures located close to either CI, where there was a signal void/distortion area. CONCLUSIONS: Suitable unilateral CI positioning can allow the visualization of intracranial structures with sufficient visibility for diagnostic purposes. Bilateral CI positioning significantly deteriorates the anatomical visibility. CI positioning might play a crucial role for patients who need post-operative MRI surveillance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-07005-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9072450/ /pubmed/34370074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07005-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Otology Canzi, Pietro Magnetto, Marianna Simoncelli, Anna Manfrin, Marco Aprile, Federico Lafe, Elvis Carlotto, Elena Avato, Irene Scribante, Andrea Preda, Lorenzo Benazzo, Marco The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system |
title | The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system |
title_full | The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system |
title_fullStr | The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system |
title_short | The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system |
title_sort | role of cochlear implant positioning on mr imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system |
topic | Otology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07005-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT canzipietro theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT magnettomarianna theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT simoncellianna theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT manfrinmarco theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT aprilefederico theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT lafeelvis theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT carlottoelena theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT avatoirene theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT scribanteandrea theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT predalorenzo theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT benazzomarco theroleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT canzipietro roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT magnettomarianna roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT simoncellianna roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT manfrinmarco roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT aprilefederico roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT lafeelvis roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT carlottoelena roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT avatoirene roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT scribanteandrea roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT predalorenzo roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem AT benazzomarco roleofcochlearimplantpositioningonmrimagingqualityapreclinicalinvivostudywithanovelimplantmagnetsystem |