Cargando…

Overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol for the treatment of osteoporosis

SUMMARY: Eldecalcitol (ELD) is a new oral analog of the active form of vitamin D with anti-resorptive properties. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of ELD in osteoporosis. Compared with alfacalcidol, ELD significantly lowered vertebral facture risk, increased bone m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Lijia, Xia, Weibo, Yu, Chuan, Dong, Shuangshuang, Pei, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01071-3
_version_ 1784701072068050944
author Cui, Lijia
Xia, Weibo
Yu, Chuan
Dong, Shuangshuang
Pei, Yu
author_facet Cui, Lijia
Xia, Weibo
Yu, Chuan
Dong, Shuangshuang
Pei, Yu
author_sort Cui, Lijia
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: Eldecalcitol (ELD) is a new oral analog of the active form of vitamin D with anti-resorptive properties. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of ELD in osteoporosis. Compared with alfacalcidol, ELD significantly lowered vertebral facture risk, increased bone mineral density, but also had a higher risk of hypercalciuria. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol (ELD) in osteoporosis by examining fracture rates, bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, and adverse events as outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched up to July 20, 2020, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials. The odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval was calculated by the random-effects model. RESULTS: ELD significantly increased lumbar BMD (WMD: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.60, 4.00; P < 0.001, 2 studies involved), total hip BMD (WMD: 2.11; 95% CI: 0.68, 3.55; P = 0.004, 2 studies involved), and femoral neck BMD (WMD: 1.78; 95% CI: 0.76, 2.79; P = 0.001, 1 study involved) compared with alfacalcidol. Moreover, ELD caused a significantly lower rate of vertebral fracture (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29–0.95; P = 0.034, 2 studies involved) than alfacalcidol, but did not lower the rate of non-vertebral facture (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.06–3.05; P = 0.405, 2 studies involved) compared with alfacalcidol. ELD significantly reduced the percentage change in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (WMD: − 15.40; 95% CI: − 20.30, − 10.60; P < 0.001, 1 study involved) and serum type I collagen C-telopeptide (WMD: − 38.50; 95% CI: − 50.00, − 27.10; P < 0.001, 1 study involved) as compared with alfacalcidol. ELD was also associated with higher risk of hypercalciuria compared with alfacalcidol (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.20; P = 0.001, 2 studies involved). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review indicated that ELD was superior than alfacalcidol for improving vertebral fracture risk and BMD. Further large-scale trials should be conducted to verify the long-term effects and safety of ELD in osteoporosis. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020147518. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11657-022-01071-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9072485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90724852022-05-07 Overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol for the treatment of osteoporosis Cui, Lijia Xia, Weibo Yu, Chuan Dong, Shuangshuang Pei, Yu Arch Osteoporos Original Article SUMMARY: Eldecalcitol (ELD) is a new oral analog of the active form of vitamin D with anti-resorptive properties. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of ELD in osteoporosis. Compared with alfacalcidol, ELD significantly lowered vertebral facture risk, increased bone mineral density, but also had a higher risk of hypercalciuria. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol (ELD) in osteoporosis by examining fracture rates, bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, and adverse events as outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched up to July 20, 2020, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials. The odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval was calculated by the random-effects model. RESULTS: ELD significantly increased lumbar BMD (WMD: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.60, 4.00; P < 0.001, 2 studies involved), total hip BMD (WMD: 2.11; 95% CI: 0.68, 3.55; P = 0.004, 2 studies involved), and femoral neck BMD (WMD: 1.78; 95% CI: 0.76, 2.79; P = 0.001, 1 study involved) compared with alfacalcidol. Moreover, ELD caused a significantly lower rate of vertebral fracture (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29–0.95; P = 0.034, 2 studies involved) than alfacalcidol, but did not lower the rate of non-vertebral facture (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.06–3.05; P = 0.405, 2 studies involved) compared with alfacalcidol. ELD significantly reduced the percentage change in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (WMD: − 15.40; 95% CI: − 20.30, − 10.60; P < 0.001, 1 study involved) and serum type I collagen C-telopeptide (WMD: − 38.50; 95% CI: − 50.00, − 27.10; P < 0.001, 1 study involved) as compared with alfacalcidol. ELD was also associated with higher risk of hypercalciuria compared with alfacalcidol (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.20; P = 0.001, 2 studies involved). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review indicated that ELD was superior than alfacalcidol for improving vertebral fracture risk and BMD. Further large-scale trials should be conducted to verify the long-term effects and safety of ELD in osteoporosis. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020147518. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11657-022-01071-3. Springer London 2022-05-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9072485/ /pubmed/35513519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01071-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Cui, Lijia
Xia, Weibo
Yu, Chuan
Dong, Shuangshuang
Pei, Yu
Overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol for the treatment of osteoporosis
title Overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol for the treatment of osteoporosis
title_full Overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol for the treatment of osteoporosis
title_fullStr Overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol for the treatment of osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed Overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol for the treatment of osteoporosis
title_short Overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol for the treatment of osteoporosis
title_sort overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol for the treatment of osteoporosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01071-3
work_keys_str_mv AT cuilijia overviewoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofeldecalcitolforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT xiaweibo overviewoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofeldecalcitolforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT yuchuan overviewoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofeldecalcitolforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT dongshuangshuang overviewoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofeldecalcitolforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT peiyu overviewoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofeldecalcitolforthetreatmentofosteoporosis