Cargando…

Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol

AIM: There is a current lack of evidence in the literature to support the routine use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) in the setting of ileostomy or colostomy reversal. The aim of this study is to examine whether routine NPWT confers a l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Low, Ernest Z., Nugent, Timothy S., O’Sullivan, Niall J., Kavanagh, Dara, Larkin, John O., McCormick, Paul H., Mehigan, Brian J., Kelly, Michael E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35487978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04153-3
_version_ 1784701077608726528
author Low, Ernest Z.
Nugent, Timothy S.
O’Sullivan, Niall J.
Kavanagh, Dara
Larkin, John O.
McCormick, Paul H.
Mehigan, Brian J.
Kelly, Michael E.
author_facet Low, Ernest Z.
Nugent, Timothy S.
O’Sullivan, Niall J.
Kavanagh, Dara
Larkin, John O.
McCormick, Paul H.
Mehigan, Brian J.
Kelly, Michael E.
author_sort Low, Ernest Z.
collection PubMed
description AIM: There is a current lack of evidence in the literature to support the routine use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) in the setting of ileostomy or colostomy reversal. The aim of this study is to examine whether routine NPWT confers a lower rate of SSI than conventional dressings following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy. METHODS: The PRIC study is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-centre superiority trial to assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure confers a lower rate of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy when compared to conventional dressings. Participants will be consecutively identified and recruited. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio, to receive either the NPWT (PREVENA) dressings or conventional dressings which will be applied immediately upon completion of surgery. PREVENA dressings will remain applied for a duration of 7 days. Surgical wounds will then be examined on post-operative day seven as well as during follow-up appointments in OPD for any evidence of SSI. In the interim, public health nurses (PHN) will provide out-patient support services incorporating wound assessment and care as part of a routine basis. Study investigators will liaise with PHN to gather the relevant data in relation to the time to wound healing. Our primary endpoint is the incidence of SSI within 30 days of stoma reversal. Secondary endpoints include measuring time to wound healing, evaluating wound healing and aesthetics and assessing patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The PRIC study will assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure is superior to conventional dressings in the reduction of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy and ascertain whether routine NPWT should be considered the new standard of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9072509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90725092022-05-07 Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol Low, Ernest Z. Nugent, Timothy S. O’Sullivan, Niall J. Kavanagh, Dara Larkin, John O. McCormick, Paul H. Mehigan, Brian J. Kelly, Michael E. Int J Colorectal Dis Clinical Study Protocol AIM: There is a current lack of evidence in the literature to support the routine use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) in the setting of ileostomy or colostomy reversal. The aim of this study is to examine whether routine NPWT confers a lower rate of SSI than conventional dressings following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy. METHODS: The PRIC study is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-centre superiority trial to assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure confers a lower rate of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy when compared to conventional dressings. Participants will be consecutively identified and recruited. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio, to receive either the NPWT (PREVENA) dressings or conventional dressings which will be applied immediately upon completion of surgery. PREVENA dressings will remain applied for a duration of 7 days. Surgical wounds will then be examined on post-operative day seven as well as during follow-up appointments in OPD for any evidence of SSI. In the interim, public health nurses (PHN) will provide out-patient support services incorporating wound assessment and care as part of a routine basis. Study investigators will liaise with PHN to gather the relevant data in relation to the time to wound healing. Our primary endpoint is the incidence of SSI within 30 days of stoma reversal. Secondary endpoints include measuring time to wound healing, evaluating wound healing and aesthetics and assessing patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The PRIC study will assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure is superior to conventional dressings in the reduction of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy and ascertain whether routine NPWT should be considered the new standard of care. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9072509/ /pubmed/35487978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04153-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical Study Protocol
Low, Ernest Z.
Nugent, Timothy S.
O’Sullivan, Niall J.
Kavanagh, Dara
Larkin, John O.
McCormick, Paul H.
Mehigan, Brian J.
Kelly, Michael E.
Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol
title Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol
title_full Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol
title_fullStr Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol
title_short Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol
title_sort application of prevena (surgical incision protection system) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the pric study protocol
topic Clinical Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35487978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04153-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lowernestz applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol
AT nugenttimothys applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol
AT osullivanniallj applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol
AT kavanaghdara applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol
AT larkinjohno applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol
AT mccormickpaulh applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol
AT mehiganbrianj applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol
AT kellymichaele applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol