Cargando…
Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol
AIM: There is a current lack of evidence in the literature to support the routine use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) in the setting of ileostomy or colostomy reversal. The aim of this study is to examine whether routine NPWT confers a l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35487978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04153-3 |
_version_ | 1784701077608726528 |
---|---|
author | Low, Ernest Z. Nugent, Timothy S. O’Sullivan, Niall J. Kavanagh, Dara Larkin, John O. McCormick, Paul H. Mehigan, Brian J. Kelly, Michael E. |
author_facet | Low, Ernest Z. Nugent, Timothy S. O’Sullivan, Niall J. Kavanagh, Dara Larkin, John O. McCormick, Paul H. Mehigan, Brian J. Kelly, Michael E. |
author_sort | Low, Ernest Z. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: There is a current lack of evidence in the literature to support the routine use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) in the setting of ileostomy or colostomy reversal. The aim of this study is to examine whether routine NPWT confers a lower rate of SSI than conventional dressings following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy. METHODS: The PRIC study is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-centre superiority trial to assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure confers a lower rate of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy when compared to conventional dressings. Participants will be consecutively identified and recruited. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio, to receive either the NPWT (PREVENA) dressings or conventional dressings which will be applied immediately upon completion of surgery. PREVENA dressings will remain applied for a duration of 7 days. Surgical wounds will then be examined on post-operative day seven as well as during follow-up appointments in OPD for any evidence of SSI. In the interim, public health nurses (PHN) will provide out-patient support services incorporating wound assessment and care as part of a routine basis. Study investigators will liaise with PHN to gather the relevant data in relation to the time to wound healing. Our primary endpoint is the incidence of SSI within 30 days of stoma reversal. Secondary endpoints include measuring time to wound healing, evaluating wound healing and aesthetics and assessing patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The PRIC study will assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure is superior to conventional dressings in the reduction of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy and ascertain whether routine NPWT should be considered the new standard of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9072509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90725092022-05-07 Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol Low, Ernest Z. Nugent, Timothy S. O’Sullivan, Niall J. Kavanagh, Dara Larkin, John O. McCormick, Paul H. Mehigan, Brian J. Kelly, Michael E. Int J Colorectal Dis Clinical Study Protocol AIM: There is a current lack of evidence in the literature to support the routine use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) in the setting of ileostomy or colostomy reversal. The aim of this study is to examine whether routine NPWT confers a lower rate of SSI than conventional dressings following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy. METHODS: The PRIC study is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-centre superiority trial to assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure confers a lower rate of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy when compared to conventional dressings. Participants will be consecutively identified and recruited. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio, to receive either the NPWT (PREVENA) dressings or conventional dressings which will be applied immediately upon completion of surgery. PREVENA dressings will remain applied for a duration of 7 days. Surgical wounds will then be examined on post-operative day seven as well as during follow-up appointments in OPD for any evidence of SSI. In the interim, public health nurses (PHN) will provide out-patient support services incorporating wound assessment and care as part of a routine basis. Study investigators will liaise with PHN to gather the relevant data in relation to the time to wound healing. Our primary endpoint is the incidence of SSI within 30 days of stoma reversal. Secondary endpoints include measuring time to wound healing, evaluating wound healing and aesthetics and assessing patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The PRIC study will assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure is superior to conventional dressings in the reduction of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy and ascertain whether routine NPWT should be considered the new standard of care. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9072509/ /pubmed/35487978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04153-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Protocol Low, Ernest Z. Nugent, Timothy S. O’Sullivan, Niall J. Kavanagh, Dara Larkin, John O. McCormick, Paul H. Mehigan, Brian J. Kelly, Michael E. Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol |
title | Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol |
title_full | Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol |
title_fullStr | Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol |
title_short | Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol |
title_sort | application of prevena (surgical incision protection system) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the pric study protocol |
topic | Clinical Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35487978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04153-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lowernestz applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol AT nugenttimothys applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol AT osullivanniallj applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol AT kavanaghdara applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol AT larkinjohno applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol AT mccormickpaulh applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol AT mehiganbrianj applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol AT kellymichaele applicationofprevenasurgicalincisionprotectionsysteminreducingsurgicalsiteinfectionsfollowingreversalofileostomyorcolostomythepricstudyprotocol |