Cargando…

Live-Birth Prediction of Natural-Cycle In Vitro Fertilization Using 57,558 Linked Cycle Records: A Machine Learning Perspective

BACKGROUND: Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization (NC-IVF) is an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle without gonadotropins or any other stimulation of follicular growth. Previous studies on live-birth prediction of NC-IVF were very few; the sample size was very limited. This study aims to construct a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yanran, Shen, Lei, Yin, Xinghui, Chen, Wenfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35527994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.838087
_version_ 1784701126041403392
author Zhang, Yanran
Shen, Lei
Yin, Xinghui
Chen, Wenfeng
author_facet Zhang, Yanran
Shen, Lei
Yin, Xinghui
Chen, Wenfeng
author_sort Zhang, Yanran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization (NC-IVF) is an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle without gonadotropins or any other stimulation of follicular growth. Previous studies on live-birth prediction of NC-IVF were very few; the sample size was very limited. This study aims to construct a machine learning model to predict live-birth occurrence of NC-IVF using 57,558 linked cycle records and help clinicians develop treatment strategies. DESIGN AND METHODS: The dataset contained 57,558 anonymized register patient records undergoing NC-IVF cycles from 2005 to 2016 filtered from 7bsp;60,732 records in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) data. We selected matching records and features through data filtering and feature selection methods. Two groups of twelve machine learning models were trained and tested. Eight metrics, e.g., F1 score, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), etc., were computed to evaluate the performance of each model. RESULTS: Two groups of twelve models were trained and tested. The artificial neural network (ANN) model performed the best in the machine learning group (F1 score, 70.87%; MCC, 50.37%; and AUC score, 0.7939). The LogitBoost model obtained the best scores in the ensemble learning group (F1 score, 70.57%; MCC, 50.75%; and AUC score, 0.7907). After the comparison between the two models, the LogitBoost model was recognized as an optimal one. CONCLUSION: In this study, NC-IVF-related datasets were extracted from the HFEA data, and a machine learning-based prediction model was successfully constructed through this largest NC-IVF dataset currently. This model is universal and stable, which can help clinicians predict the live-birth success rate of NC-IVF in advance before developing IVF treatment strategies and then choose the best benefit treatment strategy according to the patients’ wishes. As “use less stimulation and back to natural condition” becomes more and more popular, this model is more meaningful in the decision-making assistance system for IVF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9072737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90727372022-05-07 Live-Birth Prediction of Natural-Cycle In Vitro Fertilization Using 57,558 Linked Cycle Records: A Machine Learning Perspective Zhang, Yanran Shen, Lei Yin, Xinghui Chen, Wenfeng Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND: Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization (NC-IVF) is an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle without gonadotropins or any other stimulation of follicular growth. Previous studies on live-birth prediction of NC-IVF were very few; the sample size was very limited. This study aims to construct a machine learning model to predict live-birth occurrence of NC-IVF using 57,558 linked cycle records and help clinicians develop treatment strategies. DESIGN AND METHODS: The dataset contained 57,558 anonymized register patient records undergoing NC-IVF cycles from 2005 to 2016 filtered from 7bsp;60,732 records in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) data. We selected matching records and features through data filtering and feature selection methods. Two groups of twelve machine learning models were trained and tested. Eight metrics, e.g., F1 score, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), etc., were computed to evaluate the performance of each model. RESULTS: Two groups of twelve models were trained and tested. The artificial neural network (ANN) model performed the best in the machine learning group (F1 score, 70.87%; MCC, 50.37%; and AUC score, 0.7939). The LogitBoost model obtained the best scores in the ensemble learning group (F1 score, 70.57%; MCC, 50.75%; and AUC score, 0.7907). After the comparison between the two models, the LogitBoost model was recognized as an optimal one. CONCLUSION: In this study, NC-IVF-related datasets were extracted from the HFEA data, and a machine learning-based prediction model was successfully constructed through this largest NC-IVF dataset currently. This model is universal and stable, which can help clinicians predict the live-birth success rate of NC-IVF in advance before developing IVF treatment strategies and then choose the best benefit treatment strategy according to the patients’ wishes. As “use less stimulation and back to natural condition” becomes more and more popular, this model is more meaningful in the decision-making assistance system for IVF. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9072737/ /pubmed/35527994 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.838087 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhang, Shen, Yin and Chen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Zhang, Yanran
Shen, Lei
Yin, Xinghui
Chen, Wenfeng
Live-Birth Prediction of Natural-Cycle In Vitro Fertilization Using 57,558 Linked Cycle Records: A Machine Learning Perspective
title Live-Birth Prediction of Natural-Cycle In Vitro Fertilization Using 57,558 Linked Cycle Records: A Machine Learning Perspective
title_full Live-Birth Prediction of Natural-Cycle In Vitro Fertilization Using 57,558 Linked Cycle Records: A Machine Learning Perspective
title_fullStr Live-Birth Prediction of Natural-Cycle In Vitro Fertilization Using 57,558 Linked Cycle Records: A Machine Learning Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Live-Birth Prediction of Natural-Cycle In Vitro Fertilization Using 57,558 Linked Cycle Records: A Machine Learning Perspective
title_short Live-Birth Prediction of Natural-Cycle In Vitro Fertilization Using 57,558 Linked Cycle Records: A Machine Learning Perspective
title_sort live-birth prediction of natural-cycle in vitro fertilization using 57,558 linked cycle records: a machine learning perspective
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35527994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.838087
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyanran livebirthpredictionofnaturalcycleinvitrofertilizationusing57558linkedcyclerecordsamachinelearningperspective
AT shenlei livebirthpredictionofnaturalcycleinvitrofertilizationusing57558linkedcyclerecordsamachinelearningperspective
AT yinxinghui livebirthpredictionofnaturalcycleinvitrofertilizationusing57558linkedcyclerecordsamachinelearningperspective
AT chenwenfeng livebirthpredictionofnaturalcycleinvitrofertilizationusing57558linkedcyclerecordsamachinelearningperspective