Cargando…
Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation
BACKGROUND: Many COVID-19 patients are discharged home from hospital with instructions to self-isolate. This reduces the burden on potentially overwhelmed hospitals. The Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH) Home Monitoring Programme (HMP) is a model of care for COVID-19 patients which chiefly tracks pulse...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35508350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054601 |
_version_ | 1784701136789307392 |
---|---|
author | Oliver, Jane Dutch, Martin Rojek, Amanda Putland, Mark Knott, Jonathan C |
author_facet | Oliver, Jane Dutch, Martin Rojek, Amanda Putland, Mark Knott, Jonathan C |
author_sort | Oliver, Jane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many COVID-19 patients are discharged home from hospital with instructions to self-isolate. This reduces the burden on potentially overwhelmed hospitals. The Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH) Home Monitoring Programme (HMP) is a model of care for COVID-19 patients which chiefly tracks pulse oximetry and body temperature readings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the HMP from a patient perspective. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Of 46 COVID-19 patients who used the HMP through RMH during April to August 2020, 16 were invited to participate in this qualitative evaluation study; all accepted, including 6 healthcare workers. Attempts were made to recruit a gender-balanced sample across a range of COVID-19 severities and comorbidities. Participants completed a brief semistructured phone interview discussing their experience of using the HMP. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: A thematic analysis of interview data was conducted. Feasibility was defined as the HMP’s reported ease of use. Acceptability was considered holistically by reviewing themes in the interview data. RESULTS: The HMP allowed clinical deterioration to be recognised as it occurred enabling prompt intervention. All participants reported a positive opinion of the HMP, stating it was highly acceptable and easy to use. Almost all participants said they found using it reassuring. Patients frequently mentioned the importance of the monitoring clinicians as an information conduit. The most suggested improvement was to monitor a broader set of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The HMP is highly feasible and acceptable to patients. This model of care could potentially be implemented on a mass-scale to reduce the burden of COVID-19 on hospitals. A key benefit of the HMP is the ability to reassure patients they will receive suitable intervention should they deteriorate while isolating outside of hospital settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9072784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90727842022-05-06 Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation Oliver, Jane Dutch, Martin Rojek, Amanda Putland, Mark Knott, Jonathan C BMJ Open Infectious Diseases BACKGROUND: Many COVID-19 patients are discharged home from hospital with instructions to self-isolate. This reduces the burden on potentially overwhelmed hospitals. The Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH) Home Monitoring Programme (HMP) is a model of care for COVID-19 patients which chiefly tracks pulse oximetry and body temperature readings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the HMP from a patient perspective. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Of 46 COVID-19 patients who used the HMP through RMH during April to August 2020, 16 were invited to participate in this qualitative evaluation study; all accepted, including 6 healthcare workers. Attempts were made to recruit a gender-balanced sample across a range of COVID-19 severities and comorbidities. Participants completed a brief semistructured phone interview discussing their experience of using the HMP. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: A thematic analysis of interview data was conducted. Feasibility was defined as the HMP’s reported ease of use. Acceptability was considered holistically by reviewing themes in the interview data. RESULTS: The HMP allowed clinical deterioration to be recognised as it occurred enabling prompt intervention. All participants reported a positive opinion of the HMP, stating it was highly acceptable and easy to use. Almost all participants said they found using it reassuring. Patients frequently mentioned the importance of the monitoring clinicians as an information conduit. The most suggested improvement was to monitor a broader set of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The HMP is highly feasible and acceptable to patients. This model of care could potentially be implemented on a mass-scale to reduce the burden of COVID-19 on hospitals. A key benefit of the HMP is the ability to reassure patients they will receive suitable intervention should they deteriorate while isolating outside of hospital settings. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9072784/ /pubmed/35508350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054601 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Oliver, Jane Dutch, Martin Rojek, Amanda Putland, Mark Knott, Jonathan C Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation |
title | Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation |
title_full | Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation |
title_fullStr | Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation |
title_short | Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation |
title_sort | remote covid-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35508350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054601 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oliverjane remotecovid19patientmonitoringsystemaqualitativeevaluation AT dutchmartin remotecovid19patientmonitoringsystemaqualitativeevaluation AT rojekamanda remotecovid19patientmonitoringsystemaqualitativeevaluation AT putlandmark remotecovid19patientmonitoringsystemaqualitativeevaluation AT knottjonathanc remotecovid19patientmonitoringsystemaqualitativeevaluation |