Cargando…

Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation

BACKGROUND: Many COVID-19 patients are discharged home from hospital with instructions to self-isolate. This reduces the burden on potentially overwhelmed hospitals. The Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH) Home Monitoring Programme (HMP) is a model of care for COVID-19 patients which chiefly tracks pulse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliver, Jane, Dutch, Martin, Rojek, Amanda, Putland, Mark, Knott, Jonathan C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35508350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054601
_version_ 1784701136789307392
author Oliver, Jane
Dutch, Martin
Rojek, Amanda
Putland, Mark
Knott, Jonathan C
author_facet Oliver, Jane
Dutch, Martin
Rojek, Amanda
Putland, Mark
Knott, Jonathan C
author_sort Oliver, Jane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many COVID-19 patients are discharged home from hospital with instructions to self-isolate. This reduces the burden on potentially overwhelmed hospitals. The Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH) Home Monitoring Programme (HMP) is a model of care for COVID-19 patients which chiefly tracks pulse oximetry and body temperature readings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the HMP from a patient perspective. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Of 46 COVID-19 patients who used the HMP through RMH during April to August 2020, 16 were invited to participate in this qualitative evaluation study; all accepted, including 6 healthcare workers. Attempts were made to recruit a gender-balanced sample across a range of COVID-19 severities and comorbidities. Participants completed a brief semistructured phone interview discussing their experience of using the HMP. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: A thematic analysis of interview data was conducted. Feasibility was defined as the HMP’s reported ease of use. Acceptability was considered holistically by reviewing themes in the interview data. RESULTS: The HMP allowed clinical deterioration to be recognised as it occurred enabling prompt intervention. All participants reported a positive opinion of the HMP, stating it was highly acceptable and easy to use. Almost all participants said they found using it reassuring. Patients frequently mentioned the importance of the monitoring clinicians as an information conduit. The most suggested improvement was to monitor a broader set of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The HMP is highly feasible and acceptable to patients. This model of care could potentially be implemented on a mass-scale to reduce the burden of COVID-19 on hospitals. A key benefit of the HMP is the ability to reassure patients they will receive suitable intervention should they deteriorate while isolating outside of hospital settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9072784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90727842022-05-06 Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation Oliver, Jane Dutch, Martin Rojek, Amanda Putland, Mark Knott, Jonathan C BMJ Open Infectious Diseases BACKGROUND: Many COVID-19 patients are discharged home from hospital with instructions to self-isolate. This reduces the burden on potentially overwhelmed hospitals. The Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH) Home Monitoring Programme (HMP) is a model of care for COVID-19 patients which chiefly tracks pulse oximetry and body temperature readings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the HMP from a patient perspective. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Of 46 COVID-19 patients who used the HMP through RMH during April to August 2020, 16 were invited to participate in this qualitative evaluation study; all accepted, including 6 healthcare workers. Attempts were made to recruit a gender-balanced sample across a range of COVID-19 severities and comorbidities. Participants completed a brief semistructured phone interview discussing their experience of using the HMP. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: A thematic analysis of interview data was conducted. Feasibility was defined as the HMP’s reported ease of use. Acceptability was considered holistically by reviewing themes in the interview data. RESULTS: The HMP allowed clinical deterioration to be recognised as it occurred enabling prompt intervention. All participants reported a positive opinion of the HMP, stating it was highly acceptable and easy to use. Almost all participants said they found using it reassuring. Patients frequently mentioned the importance of the monitoring clinicians as an information conduit. The most suggested improvement was to monitor a broader set of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The HMP is highly feasible and acceptable to patients. This model of care could potentially be implemented on a mass-scale to reduce the burden of COVID-19 on hospitals. A key benefit of the HMP is the ability to reassure patients they will receive suitable intervention should they deteriorate while isolating outside of hospital settings. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9072784/ /pubmed/35508350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054601 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Oliver, Jane
Dutch, Martin
Rojek, Amanda
Putland, Mark
Knott, Jonathan C
Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation
title Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation
title_full Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation
title_fullStr Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation
title_short Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation
title_sort remote covid-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35508350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054601
work_keys_str_mv AT oliverjane remotecovid19patientmonitoringsystemaqualitativeevaluation
AT dutchmartin remotecovid19patientmonitoringsystemaqualitativeevaluation
AT rojekamanda remotecovid19patientmonitoringsystemaqualitativeevaluation
AT putlandmark remotecovid19patientmonitoringsystemaqualitativeevaluation
AT knottjonathanc remotecovid19patientmonitoringsystemaqualitativeevaluation