Cargando…

Biochar Implications Under Limited Irrigation for Sweet Corn Production in a Semi-Arid Environment

The integration of biochar and deficit irrigation is increasingly being evaluated as a water-saving strategy to minimize crop yield losses under reduced irrigation in arid and semi-arid regions such as West Texas. A 2-year (2019 and 2020) open-field study evaluated the effect of two types of biochar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Manpreet, Singh, Sukhbir, Parkash, Ved, Ritchie, Glen, Wallace, Russell W., Deb, Sanjit K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35528935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.853746
_version_ 1784701157749293056
author Singh, Manpreet
Singh, Sukhbir
Parkash, Ved
Ritchie, Glen
Wallace, Russell W.
Deb, Sanjit K.
author_facet Singh, Manpreet
Singh, Sukhbir
Parkash, Ved
Ritchie, Glen
Wallace, Russell W.
Deb, Sanjit K.
author_sort Singh, Manpreet
collection PubMed
description The integration of biochar and deficit irrigation is increasingly being evaluated as a water-saving strategy to minimize crop yield losses under reduced irrigation in arid and semi-arid regions such as West Texas. A 2-year (2019 and 2020) open-field study evaluated the effect of two types of biochar amendments (hardwood and softwood) and three irrigation rates [100, 70, and 40% crop evapotranspiration (ET(c)) replacement] on the physiology, plant growth, and yield of sweet corn in semi-arid West Texas. All experimental units were replicated four times in a split-plot design. The chlorophyll content (Chl(SPAD)) in 40% ET(c) dropped significantly compared to 100% ET(c) and 70% ET(c) during the reproductive phase. Although water stress under 40% ET(c) decreased photosynthesis (P(n)) to limit transpiration (E) by stomatal closure, it improved intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE). The above-mentioned gas exchange parameters were comparable between 100% ET(c) and 70% ET(c). Both biochar treatments increased Chl(SPAD) content over non-amended plots, however, their effect on gas exchange parameters was non-significant. All growth and yield-related parameters were comparable between 100% ET(c) and 70% ET(c), but significantly greater than 40% ET(c), except water productivity (WP). Both deficit irrigation treatments improved WP over full irrigation in 2019, but in 2020, the WP gains were observed only under 70% ET(c). Hardwood biochar decreased soil bulk density and increased soil porosity, but it had a marginal effect on the water retention characteristics. These results suggest that 70% ET(c) can be used as an alternative to full irrigation to save water with a minimal yield penalty for sweet corn production in the West Texas region. The hardwood biochar application improved the vegetative biomass significantly but yield marginally during the first 2 years of application. A long-term study is required to test the effect of biochar under deficit irrigation beyond 2 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9072871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90728712022-05-07 Biochar Implications Under Limited Irrigation for Sweet Corn Production in a Semi-Arid Environment Singh, Manpreet Singh, Sukhbir Parkash, Ved Ritchie, Glen Wallace, Russell W. Deb, Sanjit K. Front Plant Sci Plant Science The integration of biochar and deficit irrigation is increasingly being evaluated as a water-saving strategy to minimize crop yield losses under reduced irrigation in arid and semi-arid regions such as West Texas. A 2-year (2019 and 2020) open-field study evaluated the effect of two types of biochar amendments (hardwood and softwood) and three irrigation rates [100, 70, and 40% crop evapotranspiration (ET(c)) replacement] on the physiology, plant growth, and yield of sweet corn in semi-arid West Texas. All experimental units were replicated four times in a split-plot design. The chlorophyll content (Chl(SPAD)) in 40% ET(c) dropped significantly compared to 100% ET(c) and 70% ET(c) during the reproductive phase. Although water stress under 40% ET(c) decreased photosynthesis (P(n)) to limit transpiration (E) by stomatal closure, it improved intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE). The above-mentioned gas exchange parameters were comparable between 100% ET(c) and 70% ET(c). Both biochar treatments increased Chl(SPAD) content over non-amended plots, however, their effect on gas exchange parameters was non-significant. All growth and yield-related parameters were comparable between 100% ET(c) and 70% ET(c), but significantly greater than 40% ET(c), except water productivity (WP). Both deficit irrigation treatments improved WP over full irrigation in 2019, but in 2020, the WP gains were observed only under 70% ET(c). Hardwood biochar decreased soil bulk density and increased soil porosity, but it had a marginal effect on the water retention characteristics. These results suggest that 70% ET(c) can be used as an alternative to full irrigation to save water with a minimal yield penalty for sweet corn production in the West Texas region. The hardwood biochar application improved the vegetative biomass significantly but yield marginally during the first 2 years of application. A long-term study is required to test the effect of biochar under deficit irrigation beyond 2 years. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9072871/ /pubmed/35528935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.853746 Text en Copyright © 2022 Singh, Singh, Parkash, Ritchie, Wallace and Deb. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Singh, Manpreet
Singh, Sukhbir
Parkash, Ved
Ritchie, Glen
Wallace, Russell W.
Deb, Sanjit K.
Biochar Implications Under Limited Irrigation for Sweet Corn Production in a Semi-Arid Environment
title Biochar Implications Under Limited Irrigation for Sweet Corn Production in a Semi-Arid Environment
title_full Biochar Implications Under Limited Irrigation for Sweet Corn Production in a Semi-Arid Environment
title_fullStr Biochar Implications Under Limited Irrigation for Sweet Corn Production in a Semi-Arid Environment
title_full_unstemmed Biochar Implications Under Limited Irrigation for Sweet Corn Production in a Semi-Arid Environment
title_short Biochar Implications Under Limited Irrigation for Sweet Corn Production in a Semi-Arid Environment
title_sort biochar implications under limited irrigation for sweet corn production in a semi-arid environment
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35528935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.853746
work_keys_str_mv AT singhmanpreet biocharimplicationsunderlimitedirrigationforsweetcornproductioninasemiaridenvironment
AT singhsukhbir biocharimplicationsunderlimitedirrigationforsweetcornproductioninasemiaridenvironment
AT parkashved biocharimplicationsunderlimitedirrigationforsweetcornproductioninasemiaridenvironment
AT ritchieglen biocharimplicationsunderlimitedirrigationforsweetcornproductioninasemiaridenvironment
AT wallacerussellw biocharimplicationsunderlimitedirrigationforsweetcornproductioninasemiaridenvironment
AT debsanjitk biocharimplicationsunderlimitedirrigationforsweetcornproductioninasemiaridenvironment