Cargando…

Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage

OBJECTIVE: The ACROBAT pilot trial of early cryoprecipitate for severe postpartum haemorrhage used deferred consent procedures. Pretrial discussions with a patient and public involvement group found mixed views towards deferred consent. This study aimed to build an understanding of how the deferred...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sweeney, Lorna, Lanz, Doris, Daru, Jahnavi, Rasijeff, Annika M P, Khanom, Farzana, Thomas, Amy, Harden, Angela, Green, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35508349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054787
_version_ 1784701277408591872
author Sweeney, Lorna
Lanz, Doris
Daru, Jahnavi
Rasijeff, Annika M P
Khanom, Farzana
Thomas, Amy
Harden, Angela
Green, Laura
author_facet Sweeney, Lorna
Lanz, Doris
Daru, Jahnavi
Rasijeff, Annika M P
Khanom, Farzana
Thomas, Amy
Harden, Angela
Green, Laura
author_sort Sweeney, Lorna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The ACROBAT pilot trial of early cryoprecipitate for severe postpartum haemorrhage used deferred consent procedures. Pretrial discussions with a patient and public involvement group found mixed views towards deferred consent. This study aimed to build an understanding of how the deferred consent procedures worked in practice, to inform plans for a full-scale trial. SETTING: Qualitative interview study within a cluster-randomised pilot trial, involving four London maternity services. PARTICIPANTS: Individual interviews were conducted postnatally with 10 women who had received blood transfusion for severe postpartum haemorrhage and had consented to the trial. We also interviewed four ‘recruiters’—two research midwives and two clinical trials practitioners who conducted trial recruitment. RESULTS: Consent procedures in the ACROBAT pilot trial were generally acceptable and the intervention was viewed as low risk, but most women did not remember much about the consent conversation. As per trial protocol, recruiters sought to consent women before hospital discharge, but this time pressure had to be balanced against the need to ensure women were not approached when distressed or very unwell. Extra efforts had to be made to communicate trial information to women due to the exhaustion of their recovery and competing demands for their attention. Participant information was further complicated by explanations about the cluster design and change in transfusion process, even though the consent sought was for access to medical data. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that deferred consent procedures raise similar concerns as taking consent when emergency obstetric research is occurring—that is, the risk that participants may conflate research with clinical care, and that their ability to process trial information may be impacted by the stressful nature of recovery and newborn care. A future trial may support more meaningful informed consent by extending the window of consent discussion and ensuring trial information is minimal and easy to understand. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12146519.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9073399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90733992022-05-18 Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage Sweeney, Lorna Lanz, Doris Daru, Jahnavi Rasijeff, Annika M P Khanom, Farzana Thomas, Amy Harden, Angela Green, Laura BMJ Open Ethics OBJECTIVE: The ACROBAT pilot trial of early cryoprecipitate for severe postpartum haemorrhage used deferred consent procedures. Pretrial discussions with a patient and public involvement group found mixed views towards deferred consent. This study aimed to build an understanding of how the deferred consent procedures worked in practice, to inform plans for a full-scale trial. SETTING: Qualitative interview study within a cluster-randomised pilot trial, involving four London maternity services. PARTICIPANTS: Individual interviews were conducted postnatally with 10 women who had received blood transfusion for severe postpartum haemorrhage and had consented to the trial. We also interviewed four ‘recruiters’—two research midwives and two clinical trials practitioners who conducted trial recruitment. RESULTS: Consent procedures in the ACROBAT pilot trial were generally acceptable and the intervention was viewed as low risk, but most women did not remember much about the consent conversation. As per trial protocol, recruiters sought to consent women before hospital discharge, but this time pressure had to be balanced against the need to ensure women were not approached when distressed or very unwell. Extra efforts had to be made to communicate trial information to women due to the exhaustion of their recovery and competing demands for their attention. Participant information was further complicated by explanations about the cluster design and change in transfusion process, even though the consent sought was for access to medical data. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that deferred consent procedures raise similar concerns as taking consent when emergency obstetric research is occurring—that is, the risk that participants may conflate research with clinical care, and that their ability to process trial information may be impacted by the stressful nature of recovery and newborn care. A future trial may support more meaningful informed consent by extending the window of consent discussion and ensuring trial information is minimal and easy to understand. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12146519. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9073399/ /pubmed/35508349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054787 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Ethics
Sweeney, Lorna
Lanz, Doris
Daru, Jahnavi
Rasijeff, Annika M P
Khanom, Farzana
Thomas, Amy
Harden, Angela
Green, Laura
Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage
title Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage
title_full Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage
title_fullStr Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage
title_full_unstemmed Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage
title_short Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage
title_sort deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the acrobat pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35508349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054787
work_keys_str_mv AT sweeneylorna deferredconsentinemergencyobstetricresearchfindingsfromqualitativeinterviewswithwomenandrecruitersintheacrobatpilottrialforseverepostpartumhaemorrhage
AT lanzdoris deferredconsentinemergencyobstetricresearchfindingsfromqualitativeinterviewswithwomenandrecruitersintheacrobatpilottrialforseverepostpartumhaemorrhage
AT darujahnavi deferredconsentinemergencyobstetricresearchfindingsfromqualitativeinterviewswithwomenandrecruitersintheacrobatpilottrialforseverepostpartumhaemorrhage
AT rasijeffannikamp deferredconsentinemergencyobstetricresearchfindingsfromqualitativeinterviewswithwomenandrecruitersintheacrobatpilottrialforseverepostpartumhaemorrhage
AT khanomfarzana deferredconsentinemergencyobstetricresearchfindingsfromqualitativeinterviewswithwomenandrecruitersintheacrobatpilottrialforseverepostpartumhaemorrhage
AT thomasamy deferredconsentinemergencyobstetricresearchfindingsfromqualitativeinterviewswithwomenandrecruitersintheacrobatpilottrialforseverepostpartumhaemorrhage
AT hardenangela deferredconsentinemergencyobstetricresearchfindingsfromqualitativeinterviewswithwomenandrecruitersintheacrobatpilottrialforseverepostpartumhaemorrhage
AT greenlaura deferredconsentinemergencyobstetricresearchfindingsfromqualitativeinterviewswithwomenandrecruitersintheacrobatpilottrialforseverepostpartumhaemorrhage