Cargando…

Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The MyPeBS study is an ongoing randomised controlled trial testing whether a risk-stratified breast cancer screening strategy is non-inferior, or eventually superior, to standard age-based screening at reducing incidence of stage 2 or more cancers. This large European Commission-funded i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roux, Alexandra, Cholerton, Rachel, Sicsic, Jonathan, Moumjid, Nora, French, David P., Giorgi Rossi, Paolo, Balleyguier, Corinne, Guindy, Michal, Gilbert, Fiona J., Burrion, Jean-Benoit, Castells, Xavier, Ritchie, David, Keatley, Debbie, Baron, Camille, Delaloge, Suzette, de Montgolfier, Sandrine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6
_version_ 1784701295540568064
author Roux, Alexandra
Cholerton, Rachel
Sicsic, Jonathan
Moumjid, Nora
French, David P.
Giorgi Rossi, Paolo
Balleyguier, Corinne
Guindy, Michal
Gilbert, Fiona J.
Burrion, Jean-Benoit
Castells, Xavier
Ritchie, David
Keatley, Debbie
Baron, Camille
Delaloge, Suzette
de Montgolfier, Sandrine
author_facet Roux, Alexandra
Cholerton, Rachel
Sicsic, Jonathan
Moumjid, Nora
French, David P.
Giorgi Rossi, Paolo
Balleyguier, Corinne
Guindy, Michal
Gilbert, Fiona J.
Burrion, Jean-Benoit
Castells, Xavier
Ritchie, David
Keatley, Debbie
Baron, Camille
Delaloge, Suzette
de Montgolfier, Sandrine
author_sort Roux, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The MyPeBS study is an ongoing randomised controlled trial testing whether a risk-stratified breast cancer screening strategy is non-inferior, or eventually superior, to standard age-based screening at reducing incidence of stage 2 or more cancers. This large European Commission-funded initiative aims to include 85,000 women aged 40 to 70 years, without prior breast cancer and not previously identified at high risk in six countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Israel, Spain, UK). A specific work package within MyPeBS examines psychological, socio-economic and ethical aspects of this new screening strategy. It compares women’s reported data and outcomes in both trial arms on the following issues: general anxiety, cancer-related worry, understanding of breast cancer screening strategy and information-seeking behaviour, socio-demographic and economic characteristics, quality of life, risk perception, intention to change health-related behaviours, satisfaction with the trial. METHODS: At inclusion, 3-months, 1-year and 4-years, each woman participating in MyPeBS is asked to fill online questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, subgroup comparisons and analysis of variations over time will be performed with appropriate tests to assess differences between arms. Multivariate regression models will allow modelling of different patient reported data and outcomes such as comprehension of the information provided, general anxiety or cancer worry, and information seeking behaviour. In addition, a qualitative study (48 semi-structured interviews conducted in France and in the UK with women randomised in the risk-stratified arm), will help further understand participants’ acceptability and comprehension of the trial, and their experience of risk assessment. DISCUSSION: Beyond the scientific and medical objectives of this clinical study, it is critical to acknowledge the consequences of such a paradigm shift for women. Indeed, introducing a risk-based screening relying on individual biological differences also implies addressing non-biological differences (e.g. social status or health literacy) from an ethical perspective, to ensure equal access to healthcare. The results of the present study will facilitate making recommendations on implementation at the end of the trial to accompany any potential change in screening strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study sponsor: UNICANCER. My personalised breast screening (MyPeBS). Clinicaltrials.gov (2018) available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03672331 Contact: Cécile VISSAC SABATIER, PhD, + 33 (0)1 73 79 77 58 ext + 330,142,114,293, contact@mypebs.eu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9073478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90734782022-05-06 Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial Roux, Alexandra Cholerton, Rachel Sicsic, Jonathan Moumjid, Nora French, David P. Giorgi Rossi, Paolo Balleyguier, Corinne Guindy, Michal Gilbert, Fiona J. Burrion, Jean-Benoit Castells, Xavier Ritchie, David Keatley, Debbie Baron, Camille Delaloge, Suzette de Montgolfier, Sandrine BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The MyPeBS study is an ongoing randomised controlled trial testing whether a risk-stratified breast cancer screening strategy is non-inferior, or eventually superior, to standard age-based screening at reducing incidence of stage 2 or more cancers. This large European Commission-funded initiative aims to include 85,000 women aged 40 to 70 years, without prior breast cancer and not previously identified at high risk in six countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Israel, Spain, UK). A specific work package within MyPeBS examines psychological, socio-economic and ethical aspects of this new screening strategy. It compares women’s reported data and outcomes in both trial arms on the following issues: general anxiety, cancer-related worry, understanding of breast cancer screening strategy and information-seeking behaviour, socio-demographic and economic characteristics, quality of life, risk perception, intention to change health-related behaviours, satisfaction with the trial. METHODS: At inclusion, 3-months, 1-year and 4-years, each woman participating in MyPeBS is asked to fill online questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, subgroup comparisons and analysis of variations over time will be performed with appropriate tests to assess differences between arms. Multivariate regression models will allow modelling of different patient reported data and outcomes such as comprehension of the information provided, general anxiety or cancer worry, and information seeking behaviour. In addition, a qualitative study (48 semi-structured interviews conducted in France and in the UK with women randomised in the risk-stratified arm), will help further understand participants’ acceptability and comprehension of the trial, and their experience of risk assessment. DISCUSSION: Beyond the scientific and medical objectives of this clinical study, it is critical to acknowledge the consequences of such a paradigm shift for women. Indeed, introducing a risk-based screening relying on individual biological differences also implies addressing non-biological differences (e.g. social status or health literacy) from an ethical perspective, to ensure equal access to healthcare. The results of the present study will facilitate making recommendations on implementation at the end of the trial to accompany any potential change in screening strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study sponsor: UNICANCER. My personalised breast screening (MyPeBS). Clinicaltrials.gov (2018) available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03672331 Contact: Cécile VISSAC SABATIER, PhD, + 33 (0)1 73 79 77 58 ext + 330,142,114,293, contact@mypebs.eu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6. BioMed Central 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9073478/ /pubmed/35524202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Roux, Alexandra
Cholerton, Rachel
Sicsic, Jonathan
Moumjid, Nora
French, David P.
Giorgi Rossi, Paolo
Balleyguier, Corinne
Guindy, Michal
Gilbert, Fiona J.
Burrion, Jean-Benoit
Castells, Xavier
Ritchie, David
Keatley, Debbie
Baron, Camille
Delaloge, Suzette
de Montgolfier, Sandrine
Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial
title Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial
title_full Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial
title_short Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial
title_sort study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “my personal breast screening” (mypebs) randomised clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6
work_keys_str_mv AT rouxalexandra studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT cholertonrachel studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT sicsicjonathan studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT moumjidnora studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT frenchdavidp studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT giorgirossipaolo studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT balleyguiercorinne studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT guindymichal studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT gilbertfionaj studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT burrionjeanbenoit studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT castellsxavier studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT ritchiedavid studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT keatleydebbie studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT baroncamille studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT delalogesuzette studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT demontgolfiersandrine studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial