Cargando…
Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial
BACKGROUND: The MyPeBS study is an ongoing randomised controlled trial testing whether a risk-stratified breast cancer screening strategy is non-inferior, or eventually superior, to standard age-based screening at reducing incidence of stage 2 or more cancers. This large European Commission-funded i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6 |
_version_ | 1784701295540568064 |
---|---|
author | Roux, Alexandra Cholerton, Rachel Sicsic, Jonathan Moumjid, Nora French, David P. Giorgi Rossi, Paolo Balleyguier, Corinne Guindy, Michal Gilbert, Fiona J. Burrion, Jean-Benoit Castells, Xavier Ritchie, David Keatley, Debbie Baron, Camille Delaloge, Suzette de Montgolfier, Sandrine |
author_facet | Roux, Alexandra Cholerton, Rachel Sicsic, Jonathan Moumjid, Nora French, David P. Giorgi Rossi, Paolo Balleyguier, Corinne Guindy, Michal Gilbert, Fiona J. Burrion, Jean-Benoit Castells, Xavier Ritchie, David Keatley, Debbie Baron, Camille Delaloge, Suzette de Montgolfier, Sandrine |
author_sort | Roux, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The MyPeBS study is an ongoing randomised controlled trial testing whether a risk-stratified breast cancer screening strategy is non-inferior, or eventually superior, to standard age-based screening at reducing incidence of stage 2 or more cancers. This large European Commission-funded initiative aims to include 85,000 women aged 40 to 70 years, without prior breast cancer and not previously identified at high risk in six countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Israel, Spain, UK). A specific work package within MyPeBS examines psychological, socio-economic and ethical aspects of this new screening strategy. It compares women’s reported data and outcomes in both trial arms on the following issues: general anxiety, cancer-related worry, understanding of breast cancer screening strategy and information-seeking behaviour, socio-demographic and economic characteristics, quality of life, risk perception, intention to change health-related behaviours, satisfaction with the trial. METHODS: At inclusion, 3-months, 1-year and 4-years, each woman participating in MyPeBS is asked to fill online questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, subgroup comparisons and analysis of variations over time will be performed with appropriate tests to assess differences between arms. Multivariate regression models will allow modelling of different patient reported data and outcomes such as comprehension of the information provided, general anxiety or cancer worry, and information seeking behaviour. In addition, a qualitative study (48 semi-structured interviews conducted in France and in the UK with women randomised in the risk-stratified arm), will help further understand participants’ acceptability and comprehension of the trial, and their experience of risk assessment. DISCUSSION: Beyond the scientific and medical objectives of this clinical study, it is critical to acknowledge the consequences of such a paradigm shift for women. Indeed, introducing a risk-based screening relying on individual biological differences also implies addressing non-biological differences (e.g. social status or health literacy) from an ethical perspective, to ensure equal access to healthcare. The results of the present study will facilitate making recommendations on implementation at the end of the trial to accompany any potential change in screening strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study sponsor: UNICANCER. My personalised breast screening (MyPeBS). Clinicaltrials.gov (2018) available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03672331 Contact: Cécile VISSAC SABATIER, PhD, + 33 (0)1 73 79 77 58 ext + 330,142,114,293, contact@mypebs.eu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9073478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90734782022-05-06 Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial Roux, Alexandra Cholerton, Rachel Sicsic, Jonathan Moumjid, Nora French, David P. Giorgi Rossi, Paolo Balleyguier, Corinne Guindy, Michal Gilbert, Fiona J. Burrion, Jean-Benoit Castells, Xavier Ritchie, David Keatley, Debbie Baron, Camille Delaloge, Suzette de Montgolfier, Sandrine BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The MyPeBS study is an ongoing randomised controlled trial testing whether a risk-stratified breast cancer screening strategy is non-inferior, or eventually superior, to standard age-based screening at reducing incidence of stage 2 or more cancers. This large European Commission-funded initiative aims to include 85,000 women aged 40 to 70 years, without prior breast cancer and not previously identified at high risk in six countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Israel, Spain, UK). A specific work package within MyPeBS examines psychological, socio-economic and ethical aspects of this new screening strategy. It compares women’s reported data and outcomes in both trial arms on the following issues: general anxiety, cancer-related worry, understanding of breast cancer screening strategy and information-seeking behaviour, socio-demographic and economic characteristics, quality of life, risk perception, intention to change health-related behaviours, satisfaction with the trial. METHODS: At inclusion, 3-months, 1-year and 4-years, each woman participating in MyPeBS is asked to fill online questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, subgroup comparisons and analysis of variations over time will be performed with appropriate tests to assess differences between arms. Multivariate regression models will allow modelling of different patient reported data and outcomes such as comprehension of the information provided, general anxiety or cancer worry, and information seeking behaviour. In addition, a qualitative study (48 semi-structured interviews conducted in France and in the UK with women randomised in the risk-stratified arm), will help further understand participants’ acceptability and comprehension of the trial, and their experience of risk assessment. DISCUSSION: Beyond the scientific and medical objectives of this clinical study, it is critical to acknowledge the consequences of such a paradigm shift for women. Indeed, introducing a risk-based screening relying on individual biological differences also implies addressing non-biological differences (e.g. social status or health literacy) from an ethical perspective, to ensure equal access to healthcare. The results of the present study will facilitate making recommendations on implementation at the end of the trial to accompany any potential change in screening strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study sponsor: UNICANCER. My personalised breast screening (MyPeBS). Clinicaltrials.gov (2018) available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03672331 Contact: Cécile VISSAC SABATIER, PhD, + 33 (0)1 73 79 77 58 ext + 330,142,114,293, contact@mypebs.eu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6. BioMed Central 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9073478/ /pubmed/35524202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Roux, Alexandra Cholerton, Rachel Sicsic, Jonathan Moumjid, Nora French, David P. Giorgi Rossi, Paolo Balleyguier, Corinne Guindy, Michal Gilbert, Fiona J. Burrion, Jean-Benoit Castells, Xavier Ritchie, David Keatley, Debbie Baron, Camille Delaloge, Suzette de Montgolfier, Sandrine Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial |
title | Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial |
title_full | Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial |
title_short | Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “my personal breast screening” (mypebs) randomised clinical trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rouxalexandra studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT cholertonrachel studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT sicsicjonathan studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT moumjidnora studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT frenchdavidp studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT giorgirossipaolo studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT balleyguiercorinne studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT guindymichal studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT gilbertfionaj studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT burrionjeanbenoit studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT castellsxavier studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT ritchiedavid studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT keatleydebbie studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT baroncamille studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT delalogesuzette studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial AT demontgolfiersandrine studyprotocolcomparingtheethicalpsychologicalandsocioeconomicimpactofpersonalisedbreastcancerscreeningtothatofstandardscreeninginthemypersonalbreastscreeningmypebsrandomisedclinicaltrial |