Cargando…

Worksite tobacco control – a qualitative study on perspectives from employers and employees at small worksites

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for tobacco control can be implemented in worksite settings to reduce tobacco use. Small worksites are less likely to adopt tobacco control EBIs than large worksites. The purpose of this qualitative study was to 1) explore factors that impact small emp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kava, Christine M., Ruiz, Raymond A., Harris, Jeffrey R., Hannon, Peggy A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13346-y
_version_ 1784701297522376704
author Kava, Christine M.
Ruiz, Raymond A.
Harris, Jeffrey R.
Hannon, Peggy A.
author_facet Kava, Christine M.
Ruiz, Raymond A.
Harris, Jeffrey R.
Hannon, Peggy A.
author_sort Kava, Christine M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for tobacco control can be implemented in worksite settings to reduce tobacco use. Small worksites are less likely to adopt tobacco control EBIs than large worksites. The purpose of this qualitative study was to 1) explore factors that impact small employers’ decisions to offer tobacco control EBIs, and 2) understand employees’ perceptions of tobacco control at small worksites. METHODS: Working with staff from small worksites (20–250 employees), we analyzed data from 12 semi-structured interviews with employers (via key informants) and four focus groups with employees. We recruited employers and employees through a purchased business list and market research company, respectively. Interview and focus group topics included perceptions of worksite tobacco control; internal and external forces shaping worksite tobacco control implementation; and perceived worksite support for cessation. We conducted thematic data analysis. RESULTS: Key themes from the employer interviews included: the local environment played an important role in implementation of tobacco control EBIs; tobacco control was perceived as important but not a priority; and tobacco control decisions were driven by worksite culture. Key themes from the employee focus groups included: perceived employer support for tobacco cessation was limited although there was interest from employees; employees who currently used tobacco were stigmatized for their behavior; and incentives and coaching were considered ideal tobacco control EBIs. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco control has not been prioritized at small worksites, despite employees welcoming additional cessation support. This study contributes important information on contextual factors and employee preferences that could be targeted to improve tobacco control EBI implementation. Worksites should implement comprehensive tobacco-free policies, minimize stigma when promoting cessation, establish equitable break policies, and involve employees in decision-making related to tobacco control. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13346-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9073486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90734862022-05-06 Worksite tobacco control – a qualitative study on perspectives from employers and employees at small worksites Kava, Christine M. Ruiz, Raymond A. Harris, Jeffrey R. Hannon, Peggy A. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for tobacco control can be implemented in worksite settings to reduce tobacco use. Small worksites are less likely to adopt tobacco control EBIs than large worksites. The purpose of this qualitative study was to 1) explore factors that impact small employers’ decisions to offer tobacco control EBIs, and 2) understand employees’ perceptions of tobacco control at small worksites. METHODS: Working with staff from small worksites (20–250 employees), we analyzed data from 12 semi-structured interviews with employers (via key informants) and four focus groups with employees. We recruited employers and employees through a purchased business list and market research company, respectively. Interview and focus group topics included perceptions of worksite tobacco control; internal and external forces shaping worksite tobacco control implementation; and perceived worksite support for cessation. We conducted thematic data analysis. RESULTS: Key themes from the employer interviews included: the local environment played an important role in implementation of tobacco control EBIs; tobacco control was perceived as important but not a priority; and tobacco control decisions were driven by worksite culture. Key themes from the employee focus groups included: perceived employer support for tobacco cessation was limited although there was interest from employees; employees who currently used tobacco were stigmatized for their behavior; and incentives and coaching were considered ideal tobacco control EBIs. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco control has not been prioritized at small worksites, despite employees welcoming additional cessation support. This study contributes important information on contextual factors and employee preferences that could be targeted to improve tobacco control EBI implementation. Worksites should implement comprehensive tobacco-free policies, minimize stigma when promoting cessation, establish equitable break policies, and involve employees in decision-making related to tobacco control. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13346-y. BioMed Central 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9073486/ /pubmed/35524298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13346-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kava, Christine M.
Ruiz, Raymond A.
Harris, Jeffrey R.
Hannon, Peggy A.
Worksite tobacco control – a qualitative study on perspectives from employers and employees at small worksites
title Worksite tobacco control – a qualitative study on perspectives from employers and employees at small worksites
title_full Worksite tobacco control – a qualitative study on perspectives from employers and employees at small worksites
title_fullStr Worksite tobacco control – a qualitative study on perspectives from employers and employees at small worksites
title_full_unstemmed Worksite tobacco control – a qualitative study on perspectives from employers and employees at small worksites
title_short Worksite tobacco control – a qualitative study on perspectives from employers and employees at small worksites
title_sort worksite tobacco control – a qualitative study on perspectives from employers and employees at small worksites
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13346-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kavachristinem worksitetobaccocontrolaqualitativestudyonperspectivesfromemployersandemployeesatsmallworksites
AT ruizraymonda worksitetobaccocontrolaqualitativestudyonperspectivesfromemployersandemployeesatsmallworksites
AT harrisjeffreyr worksitetobaccocontrolaqualitativestudyonperspectivesfromemployersandemployeesatsmallworksites
AT hannonpeggya worksitetobaccocontrolaqualitativestudyonperspectivesfromemployersandemployeesatsmallworksites