Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
IMPORTANCE: Patients with pruritus receiving hemodialysis frequently experience oppressive physical and psychiatric symptoms that directly affect their quality of life and increase mortality. However, treatment options are limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinically recommended dose of difelikef...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35511180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10339 |
_version_ | 1784701317734727680 |
---|---|
author | Narita, Ichiei Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu Uchiyama, Takuma Okamura, Shota Oya, Nobuyo Takahashi, Naoki Gejyo, Fumitake |
author_facet | Narita, Ichiei Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu Uchiyama, Takuma Okamura, Shota Oya, Nobuyo Takahashi, Naoki Gejyo, Fumitake |
author_sort | Narita, Ichiei |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Patients with pruritus receiving hemodialysis frequently experience oppressive physical and psychiatric symptoms that directly affect their quality of life and increase mortality. However, treatment options are limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinically recommended dose of difelikefalin, a κ-opioid receptor agonist, based on the efficacy, dose response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-arm phase 2 trial was conducted from February 1, 2019, to October 22, 2019, at 94 sites in Japan. Patients with moderate to severe pruritus receiving hemodialysis were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Difelikefalin (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 μg/kg) and placebo were intravenously administered 3 times a week at the end of each hemodialysis session for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the change from baseline in the weekly mean Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score at week 8. Secondary outcomes measured changes in itch-related quality-of-life score using the Skindex-16 and 5-D itch scale. Safety was assessed according to adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, body weight, and 12-lead electrocardiogram. RESULTS: A total of 247 Japanese patients (186 male [75%]; mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.7] years) were randomized to placebo (n = 63), 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), or 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 62). The changes from baseline in the adjusted mean (SE) of the 24-hour Worst Itching Intensity NRS score at week 8 were −2.86 (0.29) in the placebo group, −2.97 (0.29) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, −3.65 (0.30) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and −3.64 (0.30) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. Significant differences were found in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, −0.80; 95% CI, −1.55 to −0.04; P = .04) and the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, −0.78; 95% CI, −1.54 to −0.03; P = .04) compared with placebo. The Skindex-16 overall score and 5-D itch scale total score indicated an improvement with treatment with 0.5 and 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (adjusted weekly mean [SE] Skindex-16 overall score at week 8, −27.79 [2.05]; 95% CI, −31.83 to −23.74 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and −22.69 [2.04]; 95% CI, −26.71 to −18.68 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin; adjusted weekly mean [SE] 5-D itch scale total score at week 8, −6.5 [0.4]; 95% CI, −7.2 to −5.8 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and −6.8 [0.3]; 95% CI, −7.5 to −6.2 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin). The incidence of adverse events was 67% (42 of 63 patients) in the placebo group, 72% (44 of 61 patients) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, 77% (47 of 61 patients) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and 85% (53 of 62 patients) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. No dependency was reported. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this phase 2 randomized clinical trial of difelikefalin suggest that 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin should be the clinically recommended dose as a new option for treating moderate to severe pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis because of its efficacy, acceptable tolerability, and manageable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03802617 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9073569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90735692022-05-18 Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial Narita, Ichiei Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu Uchiyama, Takuma Okamura, Shota Oya, Nobuyo Takahashi, Naoki Gejyo, Fumitake JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Patients with pruritus receiving hemodialysis frequently experience oppressive physical and psychiatric symptoms that directly affect their quality of life and increase mortality. However, treatment options are limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinically recommended dose of difelikefalin, a κ-opioid receptor agonist, based on the efficacy, dose response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-arm phase 2 trial was conducted from February 1, 2019, to October 22, 2019, at 94 sites in Japan. Patients with moderate to severe pruritus receiving hemodialysis were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Difelikefalin (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 μg/kg) and placebo were intravenously administered 3 times a week at the end of each hemodialysis session for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the change from baseline in the weekly mean Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score at week 8. Secondary outcomes measured changes in itch-related quality-of-life score using the Skindex-16 and 5-D itch scale. Safety was assessed according to adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, body weight, and 12-lead electrocardiogram. RESULTS: A total of 247 Japanese patients (186 male [75%]; mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.7] years) were randomized to placebo (n = 63), 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), or 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 62). The changes from baseline in the adjusted mean (SE) of the 24-hour Worst Itching Intensity NRS score at week 8 were −2.86 (0.29) in the placebo group, −2.97 (0.29) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, −3.65 (0.30) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and −3.64 (0.30) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. Significant differences were found in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, −0.80; 95% CI, −1.55 to −0.04; P = .04) and the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, −0.78; 95% CI, −1.54 to −0.03; P = .04) compared with placebo. The Skindex-16 overall score and 5-D itch scale total score indicated an improvement with treatment with 0.5 and 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (adjusted weekly mean [SE] Skindex-16 overall score at week 8, −27.79 [2.05]; 95% CI, −31.83 to −23.74 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and −22.69 [2.04]; 95% CI, −26.71 to −18.68 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin; adjusted weekly mean [SE] 5-D itch scale total score at week 8, −6.5 [0.4]; 95% CI, −7.2 to −5.8 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and −6.8 [0.3]; 95% CI, −7.5 to −6.2 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin). The incidence of adverse events was 67% (42 of 63 patients) in the placebo group, 72% (44 of 61 patients) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, 77% (47 of 61 patients) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and 85% (53 of 62 patients) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. No dependency was reported. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this phase 2 randomized clinical trial of difelikefalin suggest that 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin should be the clinically recommended dose as a new option for treating moderate to severe pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis because of its efficacy, acceptable tolerability, and manageable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03802617 American Medical Association 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9073569/ /pubmed/35511180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10339 Text en Copyright 2022 Narita I et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Narita, Ichiei Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu Uchiyama, Takuma Okamura, Shota Oya, Nobuyo Takahashi, Naoki Gejyo, Fumitake Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of difelikefalin in japanese patients with moderate to severe pruritus receiving hemodialysis: a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35511180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naritaichiei efficacyandsafetyofdifelikefalininjapanesepatientswithmoderatetoseverepruritusreceivinghemodialysisarandomizedclinicaltrial AT tsubakiharayoshiharu efficacyandsafetyofdifelikefalininjapanesepatientswithmoderatetoseverepruritusreceivinghemodialysisarandomizedclinicaltrial AT uchiyamatakuma efficacyandsafetyofdifelikefalininjapanesepatientswithmoderatetoseverepruritusreceivinghemodialysisarandomizedclinicaltrial AT okamurashota efficacyandsafetyofdifelikefalininjapanesepatientswithmoderatetoseverepruritusreceivinghemodialysisarandomizedclinicaltrial AT oyanobuyo efficacyandsafetyofdifelikefalininjapanesepatientswithmoderatetoseverepruritusreceivinghemodialysisarandomizedclinicaltrial AT takahashinaoki efficacyandsafetyofdifelikefalininjapanesepatientswithmoderatetoseverepruritusreceivinghemodialysisarandomizedclinicaltrial AT gejyofumitake efficacyandsafetyofdifelikefalininjapanesepatientswithmoderatetoseverepruritusreceivinghemodialysisarandomizedclinicaltrial |