Cargando…

A Cancer Exercise Toolkit Developed Using Co-Design: Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND: Access to exercise therapy for cancer survivors is poor. Professional development to support exercise professionals in delivering these interventions is needed. Few online resources exist for exercise professionals to address this issue. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a freely availa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dennett, Amy M, Tang, Clarice Y, Chiu, April, Osadnik, Christian, Granger, Catherine L, Taylor, Nicholas F, Campbell, Kristin L, Barton, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451966
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34903
_version_ 1784701328248799232
author Dennett, Amy M
Tang, Clarice Y
Chiu, April
Osadnik, Christian
Granger, Catherine L
Taylor, Nicholas F
Campbell, Kristin L
Barton, Christian
author_facet Dennett, Amy M
Tang, Clarice Y
Chiu, April
Osadnik, Christian
Granger, Catherine L
Taylor, Nicholas F
Campbell, Kristin L
Barton, Christian
author_sort Dennett, Amy M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Access to exercise therapy for cancer survivors is poor. Professional development to support exercise professionals in delivering these interventions is needed. Few online resources exist for exercise professionals to address this issue. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a freely available online toolkit to support exercise professionals working with cancer survivors. METHODS: A 2-phase, experience-based co-design approach was used to develop and evaluate the online toolkit. The two phases were as follows: 1) needs identification and co-design of resources and platform and 2) pilot evaluation. Four co-design workshops were conducted, transcribed, and thematically analyzed to identify key elements for the toolkit. For the pilot evaluation, a customized survey (the Determinants of Implementation Behavior Questionnaire) was distributed to exercise professionals at baseline and 3 months after launch of the online toolkit to determine its usability, utility, and effectiveness in improving their knowledge, confidence, and behavior. Results were reported as the median and interquartile range and changes were calculated using non-parametric tests. Website analytics described site usage after the initial evaluation. RESULTS: Twenty-five exercise professionals participated in co-designing 8 key elements of the online Cancer Exercise Toolkit: the homepage and pages for getting started, screening and safety, assessment, exercise prescription, education, locations, and resources. For the pilot evaluation, 277/320 respondents (87% of whom were physiotherapists) from 26 countries completed the survey at baseline, with 58 exercise professionals completing follow-up surveys at 3 months. Exercise professionals’ knowledge, skills, and confidence in delivering exercise therapy to cancer survivors increased 3 months after baseline (items 1, 6, and 8: median score 5, IQR 3 to 6) to follow-up (items 1 and 6: median score 6, IQR 5 to 6; item 8: median score 5, IQR 5 to 7; P<.001) on a 1 to 7 Likert scale. Most participants (35/44, 80%) agreed or strongly agreed they would recommend the toolkit to colleagues. In the 6 months following the pilot evaluation, the toolkit received an average of 866 views per month. CONCLUSIONS: The co-designed online Cancer Exercise Toolkit was a useful resource for exercise professionals that may increase their knowledge, skills, and confidence in providing exercise therapy to cancer survivors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9073617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90736172022-05-07 A Cancer Exercise Toolkit Developed Using Co-Design: Mixed Methods Study Dennett, Amy M Tang, Clarice Y Chiu, April Osadnik, Christian Granger, Catherine L Taylor, Nicholas F Campbell, Kristin L Barton, Christian JMIR Cancer Original Paper BACKGROUND: Access to exercise therapy for cancer survivors is poor. Professional development to support exercise professionals in delivering these interventions is needed. Few online resources exist for exercise professionals to address this issue. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a freely available online toolkit to support exercise professionals working with cancer survivors. METHODS: A 2-phase, experience-based co-design approach was used to develop and evaluate the online toolkit. The two phases were as follows: 1) needs identification and co-design of resources and platform and 2) pilot evaluation. Four co-design workshops were conducted, transcribed, and thematically analyzed to identify key elements for the toolkit. For the pilot evaluation, a customized survey (the Determinants of Implementation Behavior Questionnaire) was distributed to exercise professionals at baseline and 3 months after launch of the online toolkit to determine its usability, utility, and effectiveness in improving their knowledge, confidence, and behavior. Results were reported as the median and interquartile range and changes were calculated using non-parametric tests. Website analytics described site usage after the initial evaluation. RESULTS: Twenty-five exercise professionals participated in co-designing 8 key elements of the online Cancer Exercise Toolkit: the homepage and pages for getting started, screening and safety, assessment, exercise prescription, education, locations, and resources. For the pilot evaluation, 277/320 respondents (87% of whom were physiotherapists) from 26 countries completed the survey at baseline, with 58 exercise professionals completing follow-up surveys at 3 months. Exercise professionals’ knowledge, skills, and confidence in delivering exercise therapy to cancer survivors increased 3 months after baseline (items 1, 6, and 8: median score 5, IQR 3 to 6) to follow-up (items 1 and 6: median score 6, IQR 5 to 6; item 8: median score 5, IQR 5 to 7; P<.001) on a 1 to 7 Likert scale. Most participants (35/44, 80%) agreed or strongly agreed they would recommend the toolkit to colleagues. In the 6 months following the pilot evaluation, the toolkit received an average of 866 views per month. CONCLUSIONS: The co-designed online Cancer Exercise Toolkit was a useful resource for exercise professionals that may increase their knowledge, skills, and confidence in providing exercise therapy to cancer survivors. JMIR Publications 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9073617/ /pubmed/35451966 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34903 Text en ©Amy M Dennett, Clarice Y Tang, April Chiu, Christian Osadnik, Catherine L Granger, Nicholas F Taylor, Kristin L Campbell, Christian Barton. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org), 21.04.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Cancer, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://cancer.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Dennett, Amy M
Tang, Clarice Y
Chiu, April
Osadnik, Christian
Granger, Catherine L
Taylor, Nicholas F
Campbell, Kristin L
Barton, Christian
A Cancer Exercise Toolkit Developed Using Co-Design: Mixed Methods Study
title A Cancer Exercise Toolkit Developed Using Co-Design: Mixed Methods Study
title_full A Cancer Exercise Toolkit Developed Using Co-Design: Mixed Methods Study
title_fullStr A Cancer Exercise Toolkit Developed Using Co-Design: Mixed Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed A Cancer Exercise Toolkit Developed Using Co-Design: Mixed Methods Study
title_short A Cancer Exercise Toolkit Developed Using Co-Design: Mixed Methods Study
title_sort cancer exercise toolkit developed using co-design: mixed methods study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451966
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34903
work_keys_str_mv AT dennettamym acancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT tangclaricey acancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT chiuapril acancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT osadnikchristian acancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT grangercatherinel acancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT taylornicholasf acancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT campbellkristinl acancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT bartonchristian acancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT dennettamym cancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT tangclaricey cancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT chiuapril cancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT osadnikchristian cancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT grangercatherinel cancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT taylornicholasf cancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT campbellkristinl cancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy
AT bartonchristian cancerexercisetoolkitdevelopedusingcodesignmixedmethodsstudy