Cargando…
A Systematic Review Comparing Animal and Human Scarring Models
INTRODUCTION: A reproducible, standardised model for cutaneous scar tissue to assess therapeutics is crucial to the progress of the field. A systematic review was performed to critically evaluate scarring models in both animal and human research. METHOD: All studies in which cutaneous scars are mode...
Autores principales: | Mistry, Riyam, Veres, Mark, Issa, Fadi |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9073696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35529910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.711094 |
Ejemplares similares
-
No statistically significant difference in long term scarring outcomes of pediatric burns patients treated surgically vs. those treated conservatively
por: Mistry, Riyam, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Scar Assessment Tools: How Do They Compare?
por: Choo, Amanda Min Hui, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A review of animal models for post-operative pericardial adhesions
por: Hill, Morgan A., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Constructing intervertebral disc degeneration animal model: A review of current models
por: Liang, Tongzhou, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Psychosocial and quality of life impact of scars in the surgical, traumatic and burn populations: a scoping review protocol
por: Ziolkowski, Natalia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)