Cargando…
Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy?
INTRODUCTION: Fluoroscopy is routinely used during ureterorenoscopy. According to the ‘As Low As Reasonably Achievable’ (ALARA) principle, radiation exposure should be kept as low as reasonably achievable to decrease the risk of negative long-term effects of radiation for patients and medical staff....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591959 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2022.0210 |
_version_ | 1784701407199232000 |
---|---|
author | Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L. Brits, Tim Zabegalina, Natalia S. Baard, Joyce Ballout, Mansour Beerlage, Harrie P. De Wachter, Stefan Kamphuis, Guido M. |
author_facet | Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L. Brits, Tim Zabegalina, Natalia S. Baard, Joyce Ballout, Mansour Beerlage, Harrie P. De Wachter, Stefan Kamphuis, Guido M. |
author_sort | Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Fluoroscopy is routinely used during ureterorenoscopy. According to the ‘As Low As Reasonably Achievable’ (ALARA) principle, radiation exposure should be kept as low as reasonably achievable to decrease the risk of negative long-term effects of radiation for patients and medical staff. This study aims to assess if operator-controlled imaging during flexible ureterorenoscopy for nephrolithiasis could reduce fluoroscopy time when compared to radiographer-controlled imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was a bicentric, retrospective comparison between patients treated for nephrolithiasis with flexible ureterorenoscopy with either operator-controlled imaging or radiographer-controlled imaging. A total of 100 patients were included, 50 were treated with operator-controlled imaging and 50 with radiographer-controlled imaging. Patients undergoing flexible ureterorenoscopy with a total stone burden <20 mm and data on radiation exposure were included. Patient characteristics, stone characteristics, surgical details and fluoroscopy time were recorded for each patient and both groups were compared. Patient data were expressed as median. A 2-sided p-value <0.005 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: This study found no significant differences between both groups regarding the patient and stone characteristics. However, it found a significant shorter fluoroscopy time in the operator-controlled imaging group of 33.5 seconds (IQR 16.0–70.0) compared to 57.0 seconds (IQR 36.8–95.3) in the radiographer-controlled imaging group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that operator-controlled imaging in flexible ureterorenoscopy could reduce fluoroscopy time when compared to radiographer-controlled imaging. Operator-controlled imaging might therefore allow urologists to perform ureterorenoscopy with greater independence while additionally reducing fluoroscopy time and its consequent negative effects for medical staff and patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9074056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90740562022-05-18 Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy? Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L. Brits, Tim Zabegalina, Natalia S. Baard, Joyce Ballout, Mansour Beerlage, Harrie P. De Wachter, Stefan Kamphuis, Guido M. Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Fluoroscopy is routinely used during ureterorenoscopy. According to the ‘As Low As Reasonably Achievable’ (ALARA) principle, radiation exposure should be kept as low as reasonably achievable to decrease the risk of negative long-term effects of radiation for patients and medical staff. This study aims to assess if operator-controlled imaging during flexible ureterorenoscopy for nephrolithiasis could reduce fluoroscopy time when compared to radiographer-controlled imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was a bicentric, retrospective comparison between patients treated for nephrolithiasis with flexible ureterorenoscopy with either operator-controlled imaging or radiographer-controlled imaging. A total of 100 patients were included, 50 were treated with operator-controlled imaging and 50 with radiographer-controlled imaging. Patients undergoing flexible ureterorenoscopy with a total stone burden <20 mm and data on radiation exposure were included. Patient characteristics, stone characteristics, surgical details and fluoroscopy time were recorded for each patient and both groups were compared. Patient data were expressed as median. A 2-sided p-value <0.005 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: This study found no significant differences between both groups regarding the patient and stone characteristics. However, it found a significant shorter fluoroscopy time in the operator-controlled imaging group of 33.5 seconds (IQR 16.0–70.0) compared to 57.0 seconds (IQR 36.8–95.3) in the radiographer-controlled imaging group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that operator-controlled imaging in flexible ureterorenoscopy could reduce fluoroscopy time when compared to radiographer-controlled imaging. Operator-controlled imaging might therefore allow urologists to perform ureterorenoscopy with greater independence while additionally reducing fluoroscopy time and its consequent negative effects for medical staff and patients. Polish Urological Association 2022-01-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9074056/ /pubmed/35591959 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2022.0210 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L. Brits, Tim Zabegalina, Natalia S. Baard, Joyce Ballout, Mansour Beerlage, Harrie P. De Wachter, Stefan Kamphuis, Guido M. Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy? |
title | Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy? |
title_full | Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy? |
title_fullStr | Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy? |
title_short | Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy? |
title_sort | can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy? |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591959 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2022.0210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henderickxmichaelmel canoperatorcontrolledimagingreducefluoroscopytimeduringflexibleureterorenoscopy AT britstim canoperatorcontrolledimagingreducefluoroscopytimeduringflexibleureterorenoscopy AT zabegalinanatalias canoperatorcontrolledimagingreducefluoroscopytimeduringflexibleureterorenoscopy AT baardjoyce canoperatorcontrolledimagingreducefluoroscopytimeduringflexibleureterorenoscopy AT balloutmansour canoperatorcontrolledimagingreducefluoroscopytimeduringflexibleureterorenoscopy AT beerlageharriep canoperatorcontrolledimagingreducefluoroscopytimeduringflexibleureterorenoscopy AT dewachterstefan canoperatorcontrolledimagingreducefluoroscopytimeduringflexibleureterorenoscopy AT kamphuisguidom canoperatorcontrolledimagingreducefluoroscopytimeduringflexibleureterorenoscopy |