Cargando…

Predictors of upgrading from low-grade cancer at prostatectomy in men with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging

INTRODUCTION: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density has previously been identified as a predictor of histological upgrading at radical prostatectomy, but how information from pre-treatment biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) contributes needs further clarification. The objective of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christiansen, Ola, Bratt, Ola, Kirkevold, Øyvind, Benth, Jūratė Šaltytė, Manoharan, Pathmakulendran, Selnes, Anders, Haug, Erik Skaaheim, Slaaen, Marit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591966
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2021.0217
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density has previously been identified as a predictor of histological upgrading at radical prostatectomy, but how information from pre-treatment biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) contributes needs further clarification. The objective of this register-based study was to identify predictors of upgrading at prostatectomy in men with Grade group (GG) 1 and pre-treatment bpMRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This single-center study included men with GG 1 cancer on prediagnostic biopsy, who underwent bpMRI and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) between March 2014 and September 2019. We estimated logistic regression models to explore predictors for upgrading. The explored potential predictors were age, PSA density, tumor stage and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score (dichotomised 1–3 versus 4–5). RESULTS: Upgrading was observed in 56% (73/130) of the men. PSA density was the only significant predictor for upgrading (unadjusted OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.2; 2.4 adjusted OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.2; 2.5). The probability of upgrading was lower for men with a PIRADS 1–3 than for PIRADS 4–5, but the difference was not statistically significant (adjusted OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2; 1.1, p = 0.082). Among men with PI-RADS 1–3, the probability increased with increasing PSA density (p = 0.036). With PI-RADS 4–5 the probability of upgrading was high over the entire PSA density range. CONCLUSIONS: PSA density is a clinically important factor to predict upgrading from GG1 when bpMRI shows PI-RADS 1–3. In men with PI-RADS 4–5 on bpMRI, the probability of an undetected GG 2–5 cancer is high regardless of the PSA density.