Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eick, Stephanie M., Goin, Dana E., Lam, Juleen, Woodruff, Tracey J., Chartres, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Correction
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01967-8
_version_ 1784701429956476928
author Eick, Stephanie M.
Goin, Dana E.
Lam, Juleen
Woodruff, Tracey J.
Chartres, Nicholas
author_facet Eick, Stephanie M.
Goin, Dana E.
Lam, Juleen
Woodruff, Tracey J.
Chartres, Nicholas
author_sort Eick, Stephanie M.
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9074178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90741782022-05-07 Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools” Eick, Stephanie M. Goin, Dana E. Lam, Juleen Woodruff, Tracey J. Chartres, Nicholas Syst Rev Correction BioMed Central 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9074178/ /pubmed/35513846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01967-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Correction
Eick, Stephanie M.
Goin, Dana E.
Lam, Juleen
Woodruff, Tracey J.
Chartres, Nicholas
Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
title Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
title_full Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
title_fullStr Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
title_full_unstemmed Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
title_short Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
title_sort correction: authors’ rebuttal to integrated risk information system (iris) response to “assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
topic Correction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01967-8
work_keys_str_mv AT eickstephaniem correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools
AT goindanae correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools
AT lamjuleen correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools
AT woodrufftraceyj correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools
AT chartresnicholas correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools

Ejemplares similares