Cargando…

Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Eick, Stephanie M., Goin, Dana E., Lam, Juleen, Woodruff, Tracey J., Chartres, Nicholas
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2022
Materias:	Correction
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01967-8

Ejemplares similares

Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
por: Eick, Stephanie M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools
por: Eick, Stephanie M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
por: Radke, Elizabeth G., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures
por: Bero, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Rebuttal of Con
por: Fee, Chris
Publicado: (2006)

Rebuttal of Pro
por: Maxim, Preston
Publicado: (2006)

Rebuttal to “Saying No...”
por: Clements, R. Carter
Publicado: (2003)

Rebuttal to Douglas and Elliott
por: Hudson, Robert
Publicado: (2022)

Population susceptibility: A vital consideration in chemical risk evaluation under the Lautenberg Toxic Substances Control Act
por: Koman, Patricia D., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Faulty risk-of-bias assessment in a meta-analysis of hydroxyethyl starch for non-septic ICU patients: a rebuttal
por: James, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Rebuttal to “Pro Filming in the ED”
por: Geidesman, Joel
Publicado: (2003)

Rebuttal to: Confusion on Cell Fusion
por: Sutton, Thomas L., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Development and evaluation of a novel dietary bisphenol A (BPA) exposure risk tool
por: Hartle, Jennifer C., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies
por: Hooijmans, Carlijn R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Rebuttal From Drs Sulmasy and Maldonado
por: Sulmasy, Daniel P., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Rebuttal From Drs Hick and Hanfling
por: Hick, John L., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Rebuttal to: Organoid vs Mouse Model: Which is a Better Research Tool to Understand the Biologic Mechanisms of Intestinal Epithelium?
por: Guiu, Jordi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Rebuttal to Authors' Reply, Re: Cancer Risk in Adult Residents Near Nuclear Power Plants in Korea: A Cohort Study of 1992-2010
por: Kim, Jeong-Min, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Author rebuttal to response regarding “Letter to the Editor regarding ‘Could pulmonary arterial hypertension patients be at lower risk from severe COVID-19?’”
por: Horn, Evelyn, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The association of maternal psychosocial stress with newborn telomere length
por: Izano, Monika A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Neighborhood conditions and birth outcomes: Understanding the role of perceived and extrinsic measures of neighborhood quality
por: Eick, Stephanie M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Application of probabilistic methods to address variability and uncertainty in estimating risks for non-cancer health effects
por: Nielsen, Greylin H., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Hypertension and reduced renal function: a rebuttal
por: Modesti, P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Rebuttal of "Comments to 'The HARP detector at the CERN PS' "
por: Booth, C
Publicado: (2007)

Right inferior frontal cortex: addressing the rebuttals
por: Aron, Adam R., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Rebuttal from David Simpson and Jurgen Claassen
por: Simpson, David, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Rebuttal From Drs Pandian, Murgu, and Lamb
por: Pandian, Vinciya, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Rebuttal to: Digesting the Importance of Cell Fusion in the Intestine
por: Ramadan, Rana, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Rebuttal to: Inflammation: The Straw That Broke the NAFLD Liver!
por: Mooli, Raja Gopal Reddy, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Opposition to Pharmacist Contraception Services: Evidence for Rebuttal
por: Mitchell, Madeline, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Rebuttal From Dr Tritschler et al
por: Tritschler, Tobias, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Rebuttal From Dr White et al
por: White, Douglas B., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Relationships between psychosocial stressors among pregnant women in San Francisco: A path analysis
por: Eick, Stephanie M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Drawing a different conclusion
por: Anwari, Jamil S.
Publicado: (2013)

Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria: Krauth et al. Respond
por: Krauth, David, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

NUQUEST—NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools: development of tools for the evaluation of risk of bias in nutrition studies
por: Kelly, Shannon E, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The heuristics-and-biases inventory: An open-source tool to explore individual differences in rationality
por: Berthet, Vincent, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Determinants of the Perceived Credibility of Rebuttals Concerning Health Misinformation
por: Sui, Yujia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Rebuttal to: Liver Steatosis is a Driving Factor of Inflammation
por: Raeman, Reben
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_kncuf1e1davnvs2o29rmm9cpuk