Cargando…
Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study
BACKGROUND: The 2020 American Heart Association guidelines recommend the use of a feedback device during chest compressions (CCs). However, these devices are only placed visually by medical personnel on the lower half of the sternum and do not provide feedback on the adequacy of the pressure-deliver...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00640-6 |
_version_ | 1784701434942455808 |
---|---|
author | Koyama, Yasuaki Matsuyama, Tasuku Kaino, Takako Hoshino, Tetsuya Nakao, Junzo Shimojo, Nobutake Inoue, Yoshiaki |
author_facet | Koyama, Yasuaki Matsuyama, Tasuku Kaino, Takako Hoshino, Tetsuya Nakao, Junzo Shimojo, Nobutake Inoue, Yoshiaki |
author_sort | Koyama, Yasuaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The 2020 American Heart Association guidelines recommend the use of a feedback device during chest compressions (CCs). However, these devices are only placed visually by medical personnel on the lower half of the sternum and do not provide feedback on the adequacy of the pressure-delivery position. In this study, we investigated whether medical staff could deliver CCs at the adequate compression position using a feedback device and identified where the inadequate position was compressed. METHODS: This simulation-based, prospective single-centre study enrolled 44 medical personnel who were assigned to four different groups based on the standing position and the hand in contact with the feedback device as follows: right–left (R–l), right–right (R–r), left–right (L–r), and left–left (L–l), respectively. The sensor position where the maximal average pressure was applied during CCs using the feedback device were ascertained with a flexible capacitive pressure sensor. We determined if this position is the adequate compression position or not. The intergroup differences in the frequency of the adequate compression position, the maximal average pressure, compression rate, depth and recoil were determined. RESULTS: The frequencies of adequate compression positioning were 55, 50, 58, and 60% in the R–l, R–r, L–r, and L–l groups, respectively, with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.917). Inadequate position occurred in the front, back, hypothenar and thenar sides. The maximal average pressure did not significantly differ among the groups (p = 0.0781). The average compression rate was 100–110 compressions/min in each group, the average depth was 5–6 cm, and the average recoil was 0.1 cm, with no significant intergroup differences (p = 0.0882, 0.9653, and 0.2757, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found that only approximately half of the medical staff could deliver CCs using the feedback device at an adequate compression position and the inadequate position occurred in all sides. Resuscitation courses should be designed to educate trainees about the proper placement during CCs using a feedback device while also evaluating the correct compression position. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9074206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90742062022-05-07 Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study Koyama, Yasuaki Matsuyama, Tasuku Kaino, Takako Hoshino, Tetsuya Nakao, Junzo Shimojo, Nobutake Inoue, Yoshiaki BMC Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: The 2020 American Heart Association guidelines recommend the use of a feedback device during chest compressions (CCs). However, these devices are only placed visually by medical personnel on the lower half of the sternum and do not provide feedback on the adequacy of the pressure-delivery position. In this study, we investigated whether medical staff could deliver CCs at the adequate compression position using a feedback device and identified where the inadequate position was compressed. METHODS: This simulation-based, prospective single-centre study enrolled 44 medical personnel who were assigned to four different groups based on the standing position and the hand in contact with the feedback device as follows: right–left (R–l), right–right (R–r), left–right (L–r), and left–left (L–l), respectively. The sensor position where the maximal average pressure was applied during CCs using the feedback device were ascertained with a flexible capacitive pressure sensor. We determined if this position is the adequate compression position or not. The intergroup differences in the frequency of the adequate compression position, the maximal average pressure, compression rate, depth and recoil were determined. RESULTS: The frequencies of adequate compression positioning were 55, 50, 58, and 60% in the R–l, R–r, L–r, and L–l groups, respectively, with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.917). Inadequate position occurred in the front, back, hypothenar and thenar sides. The maximal average pressure did not significantly differ among the groups (p = 0.0781). The average compression rate was 100–110 compressions/min in each group, the average depth was 5–6 cm, and the average recoil was 0.1 cm, with no significant intergroup differences (p = 0.0882, 0.9653, and 0.2757, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found that only approximately half of the medical staff could deliver CCs using the feedback device at an adequate compression position and the inadequate position occurred in all sides. Resuscitation courses should be designed to educate trainees about the proper placement during CCs using a feedback device while also evaluating the correct compression position. BioMed Central 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9074206/ /pubmed/35524185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00640-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Koyama, Yasuaki Matsuyama, Tasuku Kaino, Takako Hoshino, Tetsuya Nakao, Junzo Shimojo, Nobutake Inoue, Yoshiaki Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study |
title | Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study |
title_full | Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study |
title_fullStr | Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study |
title_short | Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study |
title_sort | adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00640-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koyamayasuaki adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy AT matsuyamatasuku adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy AT kainotakako adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy AT hoshinotetsuya adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy AT nakaojunzo adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy AT shimojonobutake adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy AT inoueyoshiaki adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy |