Cargando…

Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study

BACKGROUND: The 2020 American Heart Association guidelines recommend the use of a feedback device during chest compressions (CCs). However, these devices are only placed visually by medical personnel on the lower half of the sternum and do not provide feedback on the adequacy of the pressure-deliver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koyama, Yasuaki, Matsuyama, Tasuku, Kaino, Takako, Hoshino, Tetsuya, Nakao, Junzo, Shimojo, Nobutake, Inoue, Yoshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00640-6
_version_ 1784701434942455808
author Koyama, Yasuaki
Matsuyama, Tasuku
Kaino, Takako
Hoshino, Tetsuya
Nakao, Junzo
Shimojo, Nobutake
Inoue, Yoshiaki
author_facet Koyama, Yasuaki
Matsuyama, Tasuku
Kaino, Takako
Hoshino, Tetsuya
Nakao, Junzo
Shimojo, Nobutake
Inoue, Yoshiaki
author_sort Koyama, Yasuaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 2020 American Heart Association guidelines recommend the use of a feedback device during chest compressions (CCs). However, these devices are only placed visually by medical personnel on the lower half of the sternum and do not provide feedback on the adequacy of the pressure-delivery position. In this study, we investigated whether medical staff could deliver CCs at the adequate compression position using a feedback device and identified where the inadequate position was compressed. METHODS: This simulation-based, prospective single-centre study enrolled 44 medical personnel who were assigned to four different groups based on the standing position and the hand in contact with the feedback device as follows: right–left (R–l), right–right (R–r), left–right (L–r), and left–left (L–l), respectively. The sensor position where the maximal average pressure was applied during CCs using the feedback device were ascertained with a flexible capacitive pressure sensor. We determined if this position is the adequate compression position or not. The intergroup differences in the frequency of the adequate compression position, the maximal average pressure, compression rate, depth and recoil were determined. RESULTS: The frequencies of adequate compression positioning were 55, 50, 58, and 60% in the R–l, R–r, L–r, and L–l groups, respectively, with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.917). Inadequate position occurred in the front, back, hypothenar and thenar sides. The maximal average pressure did not significantly differ among the groups (p = 0.0781). The average compression rate was 100–110 compressions/min in each group, the average depth was 5–6 cm, and the average recoil was 0.1 cm, with no significant intergroup differences (p = 0.0882, 0.9653, and 0.2757, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found that only approximately half of the medical staff could deliver CCs using the feedback device at an adequate compression position and the inadequate position occurred in all sides. Resuscitation courses should be designed to educate trainees about the proper placement during CCs using a feedback device while also evaluating the correct compression position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9074206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90742062022-05-07 Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study Koyama, Yasuaki Matsuyama, Tasuku Kaino, Takako Hoshino, Tetsuya Nakao, Junzo Shimojo, Nobutake Inoue, Yoshiaki BMC Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: The 2020 American Heart Association guidelines recommend the use of a feedback device during chest compressions (CCs). However, these devices are only placed visually by medical personnel on the lower half of the sternum and do not provide feedback on the adequacy of the pressure-delivery position. In this study, we investigated whether medical staff could deliver CCs at the adequate compression position using a feedback device and identified where the inadequate position was compressed. METHODS: This simulation-based, prospective single-centre study enrolled 44 medical personnel who were assigned to four different groups based on the standing position and the hand in contact with the feedback device as follows: right–left (R–l), right–right (R–r), left–right (L–r), and left–left (L–l), respectively. The sensor position where the maximal average pressure was applied during CCs using the feedback device were ascertained with a flexible capacitive pressure sensor. We determined if this position is the adequate compression position or not. The intergroup differences in the frequency of the adequate compression position, the maximal average pressure, compression rate, depth and recoil were determined. RESULTS: The frequencies of adequate compression positioning were 55, 50, 58, and 60% in the R–l, R–r, L–r, and L–l groups, respectively, with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.917). Inadequate position occurred in the front, back, hypothenar and thenar sides. The maximal average pressure did not significantly differ among the groups (p = 0.0781). The average compression rate was 100–110 compressions/min in each group, the average depth was 5–6 cm, and the average recoil was 0.1 cm, with no significant intergroup differences (p = 0.0882, 0.9653, and 0.2757, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found that only approximately half of the medical staff could deliver CCs using the feedback device at an adequate compression position and the inadequate position occurred in all sides. Resuscitation courses should be designed to educate trainees about the proper placement during CCs using a feedback device while also evaluating the correct compression position. BioMed Central 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9074206/ /pubmed/35524185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00640-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Koyama, Yasuaki
Matsuyama, Tasuku
Kaino, Takako
Hoshino, Tetsuya
Nakao, Junzo
Shimojo, Nobutake
Inoue, Yoshiaki
Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study
title Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study
title_full Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study
title_fullStr Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study
title_full_unstemmed Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study
title_short Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study
title_sort adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00640-6
work_keys_str_mv AT koyamayasuaki adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy
AT matsuyamatasuku adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy
AT kainotakako adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy
AT hoshinotetsuya adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy
AT nakaojunzo adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy
AT shimojonobutake adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy
AT inoueyoshiaki adequacyofcompressionpositioningusingthefeedbackdeviceduringchestcompressionsbymedicalstaffinasimulationstudy