Cargando…

Primary care patients’ perspectives on the use of non-pharmacological home remedies in Geneva: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Home remedies are anchored in patients’ everyday life, but their use in Western cultures remains scarcely explored. Our objectives were to investigate primary care patients’ perspectives and use of non-pharmacological home remedies in Geneva (Switzerland). METHODS: In spring 2020, we con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winkler, Neria E., Sebo, Paul, Haller, Dagmar M., Maisonneuve, Hubert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-022-03564-7
_version_ 1784701452515540992
author Winkler, Neria E.
Sebo, Paul
Haller, Dagmar M.
Maisonneuve, Hubert
author_facet Winkler, Neria E.
Sebo, Paul
Haller, Dagmar M.
Maisonneuve, Hubert
author_sort Winkler, Neria E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Home remedies are anchored in patients’ everyday life, but their use in Western cultures remains scarcely explored. Our objectives were to investigate primary care patients’ perspectives and use of non-pharmacological home remedies in Geneva (Switzerland). METHODS: In spring 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among adult primary care patients in randomly selected general practices (N = 15). Patients were recruited in the waiting rooms and asked to complete a questionnaire about their sociodemographic characteristics, their home remedy use, and their expectations and reasons for using (or not using) home remedies. We employed descriptive statistics to summarise the data and logistic regression adjusted for clustering within practices to explore associations between home remedy use and participants’ sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Three hundred fourteen of three hundred ninety patients agreed to participate in the study (participation rate 80.5%). Home remedies were used by 64.4% of patients. The main reasons given were for preventive purposes (55.3%), self-care (41.0%), as an alternative to conventional medicine (40.5%) and to avoid or delay a medical consultation (38.5%). One-third of patients considered that it was the GP’s role to spontaneously inform them about home remedies (36.4%), another third considered that it was the GP’s role to inform them, but only upon specific request (32.3%), and the last third of patients declared that it was not the GP’s role to provide information about home remedies (30.3%). Patients living in an urban zone (adjusted OR 2.1; 95%CI 1.0–4.4; p 0.05) and those with a tertiary education background (adjusted OR 1.9; 95%CI 1.0–3.6; p 0.05) believed that it was their GP’s role to inform them about home remedies. CONCLUSIONS: Home remedies are used by a majority of primary care patients in Geneva. For a comprehensive and safe healthcare management in the context of patient-oriented medicine, more evidence-based research on efficacy and safety of home remedies as well as their place in primary care consultation is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9074289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90742892022-05-07 Primary care patients’ perspectives on the use of non-pharmacological home remedies in Geneva: a cross-sectional study Winkler, Neria E. Sebo, Paul Haller, Dagmar M. Maisonneuve, Hubert BMC Complement Med Ther Research BACKGROUND: Home remedies are anchored in patients’ everyday life, but their use in Western cultures remains scarcely explored. Our objectives were to investigate primary care patients’ perspectives and use of non-pharmacological home remedies in Geneva (Switzerland). METHODS: In spring 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among adult primary care patients in randomly selected general practices (N = 15). Patients were recruited in the waiting rooms and asked to complete a questionnaire about their sociodemographic characteristics, their home remedy use, and their expectations and reasons for using (or not using) home remedies. We employed descriptive statistics to summarise the data and logistic regression adjusted for clustering within practices to explore associations between home remedy use and participants’ sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Three hundred fourteen of three hundred ninety patients agreed to participate in the study (participation rate 80.5%). Home remedies were used by 64.4% of patients. The main reasons given were for preventive purposes (55.3%), self-care (41.0%), as an alternative to conventional medicine (40.5%) and to avoid or delay a medical consultation (38.5%). One-third of patients considered that it was the GP’s role to spontaneously inform them about home remedies (36.4%), another third considered that it was the GP’s role to inform them, but only upon specific request (32.3%), and the last third of patients declared that it was not the GP’s role to provide information about home remedies (30.3%). Patients living in an urban zone (adjusted OR 2.1; 95%CI 1.0–4.4; p 0.05) and those with a tertiary education background (adjusted OR 1.9; 95%CI 1.0–3.6; p 0.05) believed that it was their GP’s role to inform them about home remedies. CONCLUSIONS: Home remedies are used by a majority of primary care patients in Geneva. For a comprehensive and safe healthcare management in the context of patient-oriented medicine, more evidence-based research on efficacy and safety of home remedies as well as their place in primary care consultation is required. BioMed Central 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9074289/ /pubmed/35513859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-022-03564-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Winkler, Neria E.
Sebo, Paul
Haller, Dagmar M.
Maisonneuve, Hubert
Primary care patients’ perspectives on the use of non-pharmacological home remedies in Geneva: a cross-sectional study
title Primary care patients’ perspectives on the use of non-pharmacological home remedies in Geneva: a cross-sectional study
title_full Primary care patients’ perspectives on the use of non-pharmacological home remedies in Geneva: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Primary care patients’ perspectives on the use of non-pharmacological home remedies in Geneva: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Primary care patients’ perspectives on the use of non-pharmacological home remedies in Geneva: a cross-sectional study
title_short Primary care patients’ perspectives on the use of non-pharmacological home remedies in Geneva: a cross-sectional study
title_sort primary care patients’ perspectives on the use of non-pharmacological home remedies in geneva: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-022-03564-7
work_keys_str_mv AT winklerneriae primarycarepatientsperspectivesontheuseofnonpharmacologicalhomeremediesingenevaacrosssectionalstudy
AT sebopaul primarycarepatientsperspectivesontheuseofnonpharmacologicalhomeremediesingenevaacrosssectionalstudy
AT hallerdagmarm primarycarepatientsperspectivesontheuseofnonpharmacologicalhomeremediesingenevaacrosssectionalstudy
AT maisonneuvehubert primarycarepatientsperspectivesontheuseofnonpharmacologicalhomeremediesingenevaacrosssectionalstudy