Cargando…

Survival analysis of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers: a retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND: Retention is an important aspect of orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to analyze the survival of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the records of 118 orthodontic patients (90 females, 28 males, m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rezaei, Navid, Bagheri, Zahra, Golshah, Amin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02202-5
_version_ 1784701456274685952
author Rezaei, Navid
Bagheri, Zahra
Golshah, Amin
author_facet Rezaei, Navid
Bagheri, Zahra
Golshah, Amin
author_sort Rezaei, Navid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Retention is an important aspect of orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to analyze the survival of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the records of 118 orthodontic patients (90 females, 28 males, mean age of 22.34 ± 6.44 years) retrieved from a private orthodontic office. Data regarding the retainer failure, dental caries, unwanted tooth movements, maximum pocket depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP) recorded at the follow-up sessions were extracted from patient records. Three types of retainer wires namely Bond-A-Braid, Orthoflex, and Retainium were compared regarding the abovementioned parameters. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, Chi-square, Monte-Carlo Chi-square, and Kruskal Wallis tests, the log rank test, and the Cox regression model. RESULTS: The frequency of retainer failure was not significantly different between males and females, different age groups, or different treatment durations (P > 0.05). Wire fracture was the most common failure type in both the maxilla and mandible. Also, the frequency of failure was not significantly different between the maxillary and mandibular retainers (P > 0.05). The frequency of failure, and survival of the three types of retainer wires were not significantly different during a 5-year period (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The three types of orthodontic retainers had comparable survival rates. Their failure rate was not correlated with the age or gender of patients or the treatment duration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02202-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9074306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90743062022-05-07 Survival analysis of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers: a retrospective cohort Rezaei, Navid Bagheri, Zahra Golshah, Amin BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Retention is an important aspect of orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to analyze the survival of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the records of 118 orthodontic patients (90 females, 28 males, mean age of 22.34 ± 6.44 years) retrieved from a private orthodontic office. Data regarding the retainer failure, dental caries, unwanted tooth movements, maximum pocket depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP) recorded at the follow-up sessions were extracted from patient records. Three types of retainer wires namely Bond-A-Braid, Orthoflex, and Retainium were compared regarding the abovementioned parameters. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, Chi-square, Monte-Carlo Chi-square, and Kruskal Wallis tests, the log rank test, and the Cox regression model. RESULTS: The frequency of retainer failure was not significantly different between males and females, different age groups, or different treatment durations (P > 0.05). Wire fracture was the most common failure type in both the maxilla and mandible. Also, the frequency of failure was not significantly different between the maxillary and mandibular retainers (P > 0.05). The frequency of failure, and survival of the three types of retainer wires were not significantly different during a 5-year period (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The three types of orthodontic retainers had comparable survival rates. Their failure rate was not correlated with the age or gender of patients or the treatment duration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02202-5. BioMed Central 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9074306/ /pubmed/35524248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02202-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rezaei, Navid
Bagheri, Zahra
Golshah, Amin
Survival analysis of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers: a retrospective cohort
title Survival analysis of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers: a retrospective cohort
title_full Survival analysis of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers: a retrospective cohort
title_fullStr Survival analysis of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers: a retrospective cohort
title_full_unstemmed Survival analysis of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers: a retrospective cohort
title_short Survival analysis of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers: a retrospective cohort
title_sort survival analysis of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers: a retrospective cohort
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02202-5
work_keys_str_mv AT rezaeinavid survivalanalysisofthreetypesofmaxillaryandmandibularbondedorthodonticretainersaretrospectivecohort
AT bagherizahra survivalanalysisofthreetypesofmaxillaryandmandibularbondedorthodonticretainersaretrospectivecohort
AT golshahamin survivalanalysisofthreetypesofmaxillaryandmandibularbondedorthodonticretainersaretrospectivecohort