Cargando…

Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model

The use of volatile anesthetics as sedatives in the intensive care unit is relevant to the patient's outcome. We compared anesthetic gas consumption of the conventional semi-closed Aisys CS™ with the MIRUS™ system, which is the first anesthetic gas reflector system that can administer desfluran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bellgardt, Martin, Vinnikov, Vladimir, Georgevici, Adrian Iustin, Procopiuc, Livia, Weber, Thomas Peter, Meiser, Andreas, Herzog-Niescery, Jennifer, Drees, Dominik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35435423
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.337991
_version_ 1784701579025186816
author Bellgardt, Martin
Vinnikov, Vladimir
Georgevici, Adrian Iustin
Procopiuc, Livia
Weber, Thomas Peter
Meiser, Andreas
Herzog-Niescery, Jennifer
Drees, Dominik
author_facet Bellgardt, Martin
Vinnikov, Vladimir
Georgevici, Adrian Iustin
Procopiuc, Livia
Weber, Thomas Peter
Meiser, Andreas
Herzog-Niescery, Jennifer
Drees, Dominik
author_sort Bellgardt, Martin
collection PubMed
description The use of volatile anesthetics as sedatives in the intensive care unit is relevant to the patient's outcome. We compared anesthetic gas consumption of the conventional semi-closed Aisys CS™ with the MIRUS™ system, which is the first anesthetic gas reflector system that can administer desflurane in addition to isoflurane and sevoflurane. We connected an artificial lung model to either a MIRUS™ system and a Puritan Bennett™ 840 ventilator or an Aisys CS™ anesthesia machine. We found that consumption of 0.5% isoflurane, which corresponds to the target concentration 0.5 MAC, was averaged to 2 mL/h in the MIRUS™ system, which is identical to the Aisys CS™ at a fresh gas flow (FGF) of 1.0 L/min. MIRUS™ consumption of 1% sevoflurane was averaged to 10 mL/h, which corresponds to 8.4 mL/h at FGF 2.5 L/min. The MIRUS™ system consumed 3% or 4% desflurane at an average of 13.0 mL/h or 21.3 mL/h, which is between the consumption at 1.0 L/min and 2.5 L/min FGF. Thus, the MIRUS™ system can effectively deliver volatile anesthetics in clinically relevant concentrations in a similar rate as a conventional circular breathing system at FGFs between 1.0 L/min and 2.5 L/min.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9074978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90749782022-05-07 Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model Bellgardt, Martin Vinnikov, Vladimir Georgevici, Adrian Iustin Procopiuc, Livia Weber, Thomas Peter Meiser, Andreas Herzog-Niescery, Jennifer Drees, Dominik Med Gas Res Research Article The use of volatile anesthetics as sedatives in the intensive care unit is relevant to the patient's outcome. We compared anesthetic gas consumption of the conventional semi-closed Aisys CS™ with the MIRUS™ system, which is the first anesthetic gas reflector system that can administer desflurane in addition to isoflurane and sevoflurane. We connected an artificial lung model to either a MIRUS™ system and a Puritan Bennett™ 840 ventilator or an Aisys CS™ anesthesia machine. We found that consumption of 0.5% isoflurane, which corresponds to the target concentration 0.5 MAC, was averaged to 2 mL/h in the MIRUS™ system, which is identical to the Aisys CS™ at a fresh gas flow (FGF) of 1.0 L/min. MIRUS™ consumption of 1% sevoflurane was averaged to 10 mL/h, which corresponds to 8.4 mL/h at FGF 2.5 L/min. The MIRUS™ system consumed 3% or 4% desflurane at an average of 13.0 mL/h or 21.3 mL/h, which is between the consumption at 1.0 L/min and 2.5 L/min FGF. Thus, the MIRUS™ system can effectively deliver volatile anesthetics in clinically relevant concentrations in a similar rate as a conventional circular breathing system at FGFs between 1.0 L/min and 2.5 L/min. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9074978/ /pubmed/35435423 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.337991 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Medical Gas Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bellgardt, Martin
Vinnikov, Vladimir
Georgevici, Adrian Iustin
Procopiuc, Livia
Weber, Thomas Peter
Meiser, Andreas
Herzog-Niescery, Jennifer
Drees, Dominik
Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model
title Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model
title_full Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model
title_fullStr Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model
title_full_unstemmed Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model
title_short Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model
title_sort anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35435423
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.337991
work_keys_str_mv AT bellgardtmartin anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel
AT vinnikovvladimir anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel
AT georgeviciadrianiustin anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel
AT procopiuclivia anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel
AT weberthomaspeter anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel
AT meiserandreas anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel
AT herzogniesceryjennifer anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel
AT dreesdominik anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel