Cargando…
Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model
The use of volatile anesthetics as sedatives in the intensive care unit is relevant to the patient's outcome. We compared anesthetic gas consumption of the conventional semi-closed Aisys CS™ with the MIRUS™ system, which is the first anesthetic gas reflector system that can administer desfluran...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35435423 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.337991 |
_version_ | 1784701579025186816 |
---|---|
author | Bellgardt, Martin Vinnikov, Vladimir Georgevici, Adrian Iustin Procopiuc, Livia Weber, Thomas Peter Meiser, Andreas Herzog-Niescery, Jennifer Drees, Dominik |
author_facet | Bellgardt, Martin Vinnikov, Vladimir Georgevici, Adrian Iustin Procopiuc, Livia Weber, Thomas Peter Meiser, Andreas Herzog-Niescery, Jennifer Drees, Dominik |
author_sort | Bellgardt, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of volatile anesthetics as sedatives in the intensive care unit is relevant to the patient's outcome. We compared anesthetic gas consumption of the conventional semi-closed Aisys CS™ with the MIRUS™ system, which is the first anesthetic gas reflector system that can administer desflurane in addition to isoflurane and sevoflurane. We connected an artificial lung model to either a MIRUS™ system and a Puritan Bennett™ 840 ventilator or an Aisys CS™ anesthesia machine. We found that consumption of 0.5% isoflurane, which corresponds to the target concentration 0.5 MAC, was averaged to 2 mL/h in the MIRUS™ system, which is identical to the Aisys CS™ at a fresh gas flow (FGF) of 1.0 L/min. MIRUS™ consumption of 1% sevoflurane was averaged to 10 mL/h, which corresponds to 8.4 mL/h at FGF 2.5 L/min. The MIRUS™ system consumed 3% or 4% desflurane at an average of 13.0 mL/h or 21.3 mL/h, which is between the consumption at 1.0 L/min and 2.5 L/min FGF. Thus, the MIRUS™ system can effectively deliver volatile anesthetics in clinically relevant concentrations in a similar rate as a conventional circular breathing system at FGFs between 1.0 L/min and 2.5 L/min. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9074978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90749782022-05-07 Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model Bellgardt, Martin Vinnikov, Vladimir Georgevici, Adrian Iustin Procopiuc, Livia Weber, Thomas Peter Meiser, Andreas Herzog-Niescery, Jennifer Drees, Dominik Med Gas Res Research Article The use of volatile anesthetics as sedatives in the intensive care unit is relevant to the patient's outcome. We compared anesthetic gas consumption of the conventional semi-closed Aisys CS™ with the MIRUS™ system, which is the first anesthetic gas reflector system that can administer desflurane in addition to isoflurane and sevoflurane. We connected an artificial lung model to either a MIRUS™ system and a Puritan Bennett™ 840 ventilator or an Aisys CS™ anesthesia machine. We found that consumption of 0.5% isoflurane, which corresponds to the target concentration 0.5 MAC, was averaged to 2 mL/h in the MIRUS™ system, which is identical to the Aisys CS™ at a fresh gas flow (FGF) of 1.0 L/min. MIRUS™ consumption of 1% sevoflurane was averaged to 10 mL/h, which corresponds to 8.4 mL/h at FGF 2.5 L/min. The MIRUS™ system consumed 3% or 4% desflurane at an average of 13.0 mL/h or 21.3 mL/h, which is between the consumption at 1.0 L/min and 2.5 L/min FGF. Thus, the MIRUS™ system can effectively deliver volatile anesthetics in clinically relevant concentrations in a similar rate as a conventional circular breathing system at FGFs between 1.0 L/min and 2.5 L/min. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9074978/ /pubmed/35435423 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.337991 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Medical Gas Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bellgardt, Martin Vinnikov, Vladimir Georgevici, Adrian Iustin Procopiuc, Livia Weber, Thomas Peter Meiser, Andreas Herzog-Niescery, Jennifer Drees, Dominik Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model |
title | Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model |
title_full | Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model |
title_fullStr | Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model |
title_full_unstemmed | Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model |
title_short | Anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model |
title_sort | anesthetic gas consumption with target-controlled administration versus a semi-closed circle system with automatic end-tidal concentration control in an artificial lung model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35435423 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.337991 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bellgardtmartin anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel AT vinnikovvladimir anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel AT georgeviciadrianiustin anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel AT procopiuclivia anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel AT weberthomaspeter anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel AT meiserandreas anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel AT herzogniesceryjennifer anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel AT dreesdominik anestheticgasconsumptionwithtargetcontrolledadministrationversusasemiclosedcirclesystemwithautomaticendtidalconcentrationcontrolinanartificiallungmodel |