Cargando…

Gender Differences in International Cardiology Guideline Authorship: A Comparison of the US, Canadian, and European Cardiology Guidelines From 2006 to 2020

BACKGROUND: Women continue to be underrepresented in cardiology and even more so in leadership positions. We evaluated the trends and gender differences in the guideline writing groups of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rai, Devesh, Kumar, Ashish, Waheed, Syed Hamza, Pandey, Ritambhara, Guerriero, Miranda, Kapoor, Ankita, Tahir, Muhammad Waqas, Zahid, Salman, Hajra, Adrija, Balmer‐Swain, Mallory, Castelletti, Silvia, Maas, Angela H. E. M., Grapsa, Julia, Mulvagh, Sharon, Zieroth, Shelley, Kalra, Ankur, Michos, Erin D., Gulati, Martha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35189693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024249
_version_ 1784701603148726272
author Rai, Devesh
Kumar, Ashish
Waheed, Syed Hamza
Pandey, Ritambhara
Guerriero, Miranda
Kapoor, Ankita
Tahir, Muhammad Waqas
Zahid, Salman
Hajra, Adrija
Balmer‐Swain, Mallory
Castelletti, Silvia
Maas, Angela H. E. M.
Grapsa, Julia
Mulvagh, Sharon
Zieroth, Shelley
Kalra, Ankur
Michos, Erin D.
Gulati, Martha
author_facet Rai, Devesh
Kumar, Ashish
Waheed, Syed Hamza
Pandey, Ritambhara
Guerriero, Miranda
Kapoor, Ankita
Tahir, Muhammad Waqas
Zahid, Salman
Hajra, Adrija
Balmer‐Swain, Mallory
Castelletti, Silvia
Maas, Angela H. E. M.
Grapsa, Julia
Mulvagh, Sharon
Zieroth, Shelley
Kalra, Ankur
Michos, Erin D.
Gulati, Martha
author_sort Rai, Devesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women continue to be underrepresented in cardiology and even more so in leadership positions. We evaluated the trends and gender differences in the guideline writing groups of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS), and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines from 2006 to 2020. METHODS AND RESULTS: We extracted all guidelines authors from 2006 to 2020, assessed their gender from publicly available profiles, and compared differences based on subspecialties and specific societies. Stratified and trend analyses were performed using χ(2) and average annual percentage change/average 5 year percentage change. A total of 80 ACC/AHA (1288 authors [28% women]), 64 CCS (988 authors [26% women]), and 59 ESC (1157 authors [16% women]) guidelines were analyzed. A significant increase in inclusion of women was seen in ACC/AHA (12.6% [2006] to 42.6% [2020]; average annual percentage change, 6.6% [2.3% to 11.1%]; P=0.005) and ESC (7.1% [2006] to 25.8% [2020]; average annual percentage change, 6.6% [0.2% to 13.5%]; P=0.04), but the trend remained similar in CCS (20.6% [2006] to 36.3% [2020]; average annual percentage change, −0.1% (−3.7% to 3.5%); P=0.94), guideline authors. More women were coauthors in the ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines when women were chairs of guidelines. There was a persistent disparity of women among guideline authors for general cardiology and all subspecialties, except for pediatric cardiology and heart failure guidelines. The appointment of women authors as a chair was significantly low in all societies (22.4% [ACC/AHA], 16.9% [CCS], and 7.2% [ESC]; P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant disparity in the inclusion of women on all national guideline committees, in addition to serving as a chair of cardiology guidelines. Further advocacy is required to promote equity, diversity, and inclusion in our cardiology guidelines globally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9075085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90750852022-05-10 Gender Differences in International Cardiology Guideline Authorship: A Comparison of the US, Canadian, and European Cardiology Guidelines From 2006 to 2020 Rai, Devesh Kumar, Ashish Waheed, Syed Hamza Pandey, Ritambhara Guerriero, Miranda Kapoor, Ankita Tahir, Muhammad Waqas Zahid, Salman Hajra, Adrija Balmer‐Swain, Mallory Castelletti, Silvia Maas, Angela H. E. M. Grapsa, Julia Mulvagh, Sharon Zieroth, Shelley Kalra, Ankur Michos, Erin D. Gulati, Martha J Am Heart Assoc JAHA Spotlight: Go Red for Women BACKGROUND: Women continue to be underrepresented in cardiology and even more so in leadership positions. We evaluated the trends and gender differences in the guideline writing groups of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS), and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines from 2006 to 2020. METHODS AND RESULTS: We extracted all guidelines authors from 2006 to 2020, assessed their gender from publicly available profiles, and compared differences based on subspecialties and specific societies. Stratified and trend analyses were performed using χ(2) and average annual percentage change/average 5 year percentage change. A total of 80 ACC/AHA (1288 authors [28% women]), 64 CCS (988 authors [26% women]), and 59 ESC (1157 authors [16% women]) guidelines were analyzed. A significant increase in inclusion of women was seen in ACC/AHA (12.6% [2006] to 42.6% [2020]; average annual percentage change, 6.6% [2.3% to 11.1%]; P=0.005) and ESC (7.1% [2006] to 25.8% [2020]; average annual percentage change, 6.6% [0.2% to 13.5%]; P=0.04), but the trend remained similar in CCS (20.6% [2006] to 36.3% [2020]; average annual percentage change, −0.1% (−3.7% to 3.5%); P=0.94), guideline authors. More women were coauthors in the ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines when women were chairs of guidelines. There was a persistent disparity of women among guideline authors for general cardiology and all subspecialties, except for pediatric cardiology and heart failure guidelines. The appointment of women authors as a chair was significantly low in all societies (22.4% [ACC/AHA], 16.9% [CCS], and 7.2% [ESC]; P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant disparity in the inclusion of women on all national guideline committees, in addition to serving as a chair of cardiology guidelines. Further advocacy is required to promote equity, diversity, and inclusion in our cardiology guidelines globally. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9075085/ /pubmed/35189693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024249 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle JAHA Spotlight: Go Red for Women
Rai, Devesh
Kumar, Ashish
Waheed, Syed Hamza
Pandey, Ritambhara
Guerriero, Miranda
Kapoor, Ankita
Tahir, Muhammad Waqas
Zahid, Salman
Hajra, Adrija
Balmer‐Swain, Mallory
Castelletti, Silvia
Maas, Angela H. E. M.
Grapsa, Julia
Mulvagh, Sharon
Zieroth, Shelley
Kalra, Ankur
Michos, Erin D.
Gulati, Martha
Gender Differences in International Cardiology Guideline Authorship: A Comparison of the US, Canadian, and European Cardiology Guidelines From 2006 to 2020
title Gender Differences in International Cardiology Guideline Authorship: A Comparison of the US, Canadian, and European Cardiology Guidelines From 2006 to 2020
title_full Gender Differences in International Cardiology Guideline Authorship: A Comparison of the US, Canadian, and European Cardiology Guidelines From 2006 to 2020
title_fullStr Gender Differences in International Cardiology Guideline Authorship: A Comparison of the US, Canadian, and European Cardiology Guidelines From 2006 to 2020
title_full_unstemmed Gender Differences in International Cardiology Guideline Authorship: A Comparison of the US, Canadian, and European Cardiology Guidelines From 2006 to 2020
title_short Gender Differences in International Cardiology Guideline Authorship: A Comparison of the US, Canadian, and European Cardiology Guidelines From 2006 to 2020
title_sort gender differences in international cardiology guideline authorship: a comparison of the us, canadian, and european cardiology guidelines from 2006 to 2020
topic JAHA Spotlight: Go Red for Women
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35189693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024249
work_keys_str_mv AT raidevesh genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT kumarashish genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT waheedsyedhamza genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT pandeyritambhara genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT guerrieromiranda genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT kapoorankita genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT tahirmuhammadwaqas genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT zahidsalman genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT hajraadrija genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT balmerswainmallory genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT castellettisilvia genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT maasangelahem genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT grapsajulia genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT mulvaghsharon genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT zierothshelley genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT kalraankur genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT michoserind genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020
AT gulatimartha genderdifferencesininternationalcardiologyguidelineauthorshipacomparisonoftheuscanadianandeuropeancardiologyguidelinesfrom2006to2020