Cargando…
Differences Between Anticoagulated Patients With Ischemic Stroke Versus Intracerebral Hemorrhage
BACKGROUND: Data on the relative contribution of clinical and neuroimaging risk factors to acute ischemic stroke (AIS) versus intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) occurring on oral anticoagulant treatment are scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cross‐sectional study was done on consecutive oral anticoagulant–tre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34935409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023345 |
_version_ | 1784701625495977984 |
---|---|
author | Schaub, Fabian Polymeris, Alexandros A. Schaedelin, Sabine Hert, Lisa Meya, Louisa Thilemann, Sebastian Traenka, Christopher Wagner, Benjamin Seiffge, David Gensicke, Henrik De Marchis, Gian Marco Bonati, Leo Engelter, Stefan T. Peters, Nils Lyrer, Philippe |
author_facet | Schaub, Fabian Polymeris, Alexandros A. Schaedelin, Sabine Hert, Lisa Meya, Louisa Thilemann, Sebastian Traenka, Christopher Wagner, Benjamin Seiffge, David Gensicke, Henrik De Marchis, Gian Marco Bonati, Leo Engelter, Stefan T. Peters, Nils Lyrer, Philippe |
author_sort | Schaub, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Data on the relative contribution of clinical and neuroimaging risk factors to acute ischemic stroke (AIS) versus intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) occurring on oral anticoagulant treatment are scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cross‐sectional study was done on consecutive oral anticoagulant–treated patients presenting with AIS, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or ICH from the prospective observational NOACISP (Novel‐Oral‐Anticoagulants‐In‐Stroke‐Patients)‐Acute registry. We compared clinical and neuroimaging characteristics (small vessel disease markers and atherosclerosis) in ICH versus AIS/TIA (reference) using logistic regression. Among 734 patients presenting with stroke on oral anticoagulant treatment (404 [55%] direct oral anticoagulants, 330 [45%] vitamin K antagonists), 605 patients (82%) had AIS/TIA and 129 (18%) had ICH. Prior AIS/TIA, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, and worse renal function were associated with AIS/TIA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI] 0.51 [0.32–0.82], 0.48 [0.26–0.86], 0.55 [0.34–0.89], and 0.82 [0.75–0.90] per 10 mL/min). Prior ICH, older age, higher admission blood pressure, and statin treatment were associated with ICH (aOR [95% CI] 6.33 [2.87–14.04], 1.37 [1.04–1.81] per 10 years, 1.19 [1.10–1.29] per 10 mm Hg, and 1.81 [1.09–3.03]). Cerebral microbleeds and moderate‐to‐severe white matter hyperintensities contributed more to ICH (aOR [95% CI] 2.77 [1.34–6.18], and 2.62 [1.28–5.63]). Aortic arch, common and internal carotid artery atherosclerosis, and internal carotid artery stenosis ≥50% contributed more to AIS/TIA (aOR [95% CI] 0.54 [0.31–0.90], 0.29 [0.05–0.97], 0.48 [0.30–0.76], and 0.32 [0.13–0.67]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with stroke on oral anticoagulant, AIS/TIA was 5 times more common than ICH. A high atherosclerotic burden (indicated by cardiovascular comorbidities and extracranial atherosclerosis) and prior AIS/TIA contributed more to AIS/TIA, while small vessel disease markers and prior ICH were stronger determinants for ICH. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02353585. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9075191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90751912022-05-10 Differences Between Anticoagulated Patients With Ischemic Stroke Versus Intracerebral Hemorrhage Schaub, Fabian Polymeris, Alexandros A. Schaedelin, Sabine Hert, Lisa Meya, Louisa Thilemann, Sebastian Traenka, Christopher Wagner, Benjamin Seiffge, David Gensicke, Henrik De Marchis, Gian Marco Bonati, Leo Engelter, Stefan T. Peters, Nils Lyrer, Philippe J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Data on the relative contribution of clinical and neuroimaging risk factors to acute ischemic stroke (AIS) versus intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) occurring on oral anticoagulant treatment are scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cross‐sectional study was done on consecutive oral anticoagulant–treated patients presenting with AIS, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or ICH from the prospective observational NOACISP (Novel‐Oral‐Anticoagulants‐In‐Stroke‐Patients)‐Acute registry. We compared clinical and neuroimaging characteristics (small vessel disease markers and atherosclerosis) in ICH versus AIS/TIA (reference) using logistic regression. Among 734 patients presenting with stroke on oral anticoagulant treatment (404 [55%] direct oral anticoagulants, 330 [45%] vitamin K antagonists), 605 patients (82%) had AIS/TIA and 129 (18%) had ICH. Prior AIS/TIA, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, and worse renal function were associated with AIS/TIA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI] 0.51 [0.32–0.82], 0.48 [0.26–0.86], 0.55 [0.34–0.89], and 0.82 [0.75–0.90] per 10 mL/min). Prior ICH, older age, higher admission blood pressure, and statin treatment were associated with ICH (aOR [95% CI] 6.33 [2.87–14.04], 1.37 [1.04–1.81] per 10 years, 1.19 [1.10–1.29] per 10 mm Hg, and 1.81 [1.09–3.03]). Cerebral microbleeds and moderate‐to‐severe white matter hyperintensities contributed more to ICH (aOR [95% CI] 2.77 [1.34–6.18], and 2.62 [1.28–5.63]). Aortic arch, common and internal carotid artery atherosclerosis, and internal carotid artery stenosis ≥50% contributed more to AIS/TIA (aOR [95% CI] 0.54 [0.31–0.90], 0.29 [0.05–0.97], 0.48 [0.30–0.76], and 0.32 [0.13–0.67]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with stroke on oral anticoagulant, AIS/TIA was 5 times more common than ICH. A high atherosclerotic burden (indicated by cardiovascular comorbidities and extracranial atherosclerosis) and prior AIS/TIA contributed more to AIS/TIA, while small vessel disease markers and prior ICH were stronger determinants for ICH. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02353585. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9075191/ /pubmed/34935409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023345 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Schaub, Fabian Polymeris, Alexandros A. Schaedelin, Sabine Hert, Lisa Meya, Louisa Thilemann, Sebastian Traenka, Christopher Wagner, Benjamin Seiffge, David Gensicke, Henrik De Marchis, Gian Marco Bonati, Leo Engelter, Stefan T. Peters, Nils Lyrer, Philippe Differences Between Anticoagulated Patients With Ischemic Stroke Versus Intracerebral Hemorrhage |
title | Differences Between Anticoagulated Patients With Ischemic Stroke Versus Intracerebral Hemorrhage |
title_full | Differences Between Anticoagulated Patients With Ischemic Stroke Versus Intracerebral Hemorrhage |
title_fullStr | Differences Between Anticoagulated Patients With Ischemic Stroke Versus Intracerebral Hemorrhage |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences Between Anticoagulated Patients With Ischemic Stroke Versus Intracerebral Hemorrhage |
title_short | Differences Between Anticoagulated Patients With Ischemic Stroke Versus Intracerebral Hemorrhage |
title_sort | differences between anticoagulated patients with ischemic stroke versus intracerebral hemorrhage |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34935409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schaubfabian differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT polymerisalexandrosa differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT schaedelinsabine differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT hertlisa differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT meyalouisa differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT thilemannsebastian differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT traenkachristopher differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT wagnerbenjamin differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT seiffgedavid differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT gensickehenrik differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT demarchisgianmarco differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT bonatileo differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT engelterstefant differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT petersnils differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage AT lyrerphilippe differencesbetweenanticoagulatedpatientswithischemicstrokeversusintracerebralhemorrhage |