Cargando…

Ischemic ST‐Segment Depression Maximal in V1–V4 (Versus V5–V6) of Any Amplitude Is Specific for Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (Versus Nonocclusive Ischemia)

BACKGROUND: Occlusion myocardial infarctions (OMIs) of the posterolateral walls are commonly missed by ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria, with >50% of patients with circumflex occlusion not receiving emergent reperfusion and experiencing increased mortality. ST‐segment d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyers, H. Pendell, Bracey, Alexander, Lee, Daniel, Lichtenheld, Andrew, Li, Wei J., Singer, Daniel D., Rollins, Zach, Kane, Jesse A., Dodd, Kenneth W., Meyers, Kristen E., Shroff, Gautam R., Singer, Adam J., Smith, Stephen W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022866
_version_ 1784701664677068800
author Meyers, H. Pendell
Bracey, Alexander
Lee, Daniel
Lichtenheld, Andrew
Li, Wei J.
Singer, Daniel D.
Rollins, Zach
Kane, Jesse A.
Dodd, Kenneth W.
Meyers, Kristen E.
Shroff, Gautam R.
Singer, Adam J.
Smith, Stephen W.
author_facet Meyers, H. Pendell
Bracey, Alexander
Lee, Daniel
Lichtenheld, Andrew
Li, Wei J.
Singer, Daniel D.
Rollins, Zach
Kane, Jesse A.
Dodd, Kenneth W.
Meyers, Kristen E.
Shroff, Gautam R.
Singer, Adam J.
Smith, Stephen W.
author_sort Meyers, H. Pendell
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Occlusion myocardial infarctions (OMIs) of the posterolateral walls are commonly missed by ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria, with >50% of patients with circumflex occlusion not receiving emergent reperfusion and experiencing increased mortality. ST‐segment depression maximal in leads V1–V4 (STDmaxV1–4) has been suggested as an indicator of posterior OMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed a high‐risk population with acute coronary syndrome. OMI was defined from prior studies as a culprit lesion with TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) 0 to 2 flow or TIMI 3 flow plus peak troponin T >1.0 ng/mL or troponin I >10 ng/mL. STEMI was defined by the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. ECGs were interpreted blinded to outcomes. Among 808 patients, there were 265 OMIs, 108 (41%) meeting STEMI criteria. A total of 118 (15%) patients had “suspected ischemic” STDmaxV1–4, of whom 106 (90%) had an acute culprit lesion, 99 (84%) had OMI, and 95 (81%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Suspected ischemic STDmaxV1–4 had 97% specificity and 37% sensitivity for OMI. Of the 99 OMIs detected by STDmaxV1–4, 34% had <1 mm ST‐segment depression, and only 47 (47%) had accompanying STEMI criteria, of which 17 (36%) were identified a median 1.00 hour earlier by STDmaxV1–4 than STEMI criteria. Despite similar infarct size, TIMI flow, and coronary interventions, patients with STEMI(−) OMI and STDmaxV1–4 were less likely than STEMI(+) patients to undergo catheterization within 90 minutes (46% versus 68%; P=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high‐risk acute coronary syndrome, the specificity of ischemic STDmaxV1–4 was 97% for OMI and 96% for OMI requiring emergent percutaneous coronary intervention. STEMI criteria missed half of OMIs detected by STDmaxV1–4. Ischemic STDmaxV1–V4 in acute coronary syndrome should be considered OMI until proven otherwise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9075358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90753582022-05-10 Ischemic ST‐Segment Depression Maximal in V1–V4 (Versus V5–V6) of Any Amplitude Is Specific for Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (Versus Nonocclusive Ischemia) Meyers, H. Pendell Bracey, Alexander Lee, Daniel Lichtenheld, Andrew Li, Wei J. Singer, Daniel D. Rollins, Zach Kane, Jesse A. Dodd, Kenneth W. Meyers, Kristen E. Shroff, Gautam R. Singer, Adam J. Smith, Stephen W. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Occlusion myocardial infarctions (OMIs) of the posterolateral walls are commonly missed by ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria, with >50% of patients with circumflex occlusion not receiving emergent reperfusion and experiencing increased mortality. ST‐segment depression maximal in leads V1–V4 (STDmaxV1–4) has been suggested as an indicator of posterior OMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed a high‐risk population with acute coronary syndrome. OMI was defined from prior studies as a culprit lesion with TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) 0 to 2 flow or TIMI 3 flow plus peak troponin T >1.0 ng/mL or troponin I >10 ng/mL. STEMI was defined by the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. ECGs were interpreted blinded to outcomes. Among 808 patients, there were 265 OMIs, 108 (41%) meeting STEMI criteria. A total of 118 (15%) patients had “suspected ischemic” STDmaxV1–4, of whom 106 (90%) had an acute culprit lesion, 99 (84%) had OMI, and 95 (81%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Suspected ischemic STDmaxV1–4 had 97% specificity and 37% sensitivity for OMI. Of the 99 OMIs detected by STDmaxV1–4, 34% had <1 mm ST‐segment depression, and only 47 (47%) had accompanying STEMI criteria, of which 17 (36%) were identified a median 1.00 hour earlier by STDmaxV1–4 than STEMI criteria. Despite similar infarct size, TIMI flow, and coronary interventions, patients with STEMI(−) OMI and STDmaxV1–4 were less likely than STEMI(+) patients to undergo catheterization within 90 minutes (46% versus 68%; P=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high‐risk acute coronary syndrome, the specificity of ischemic STDmaxV1–4 was 97% for OMI and 96% for OMI requiring emergent percutaneous coronary intervention. STEMI criteria missed half of OMIs detected by STDmaxV1–4. Ischemic STDmaxV1–V4 in acute coronary syndrome should be considered OMI until proven otherwise. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9075358/ /pubmed/34775811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022866 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Meyers, H. Pendell
Bracey, Alexander
Lee, Daniel
Lichtenheld, Andrew
Li, Wei J.
Singer, Daniel D.
Rollins, Zach
Kane, Jesse A.
Dodd, Kenneth W.
Meyers, Kristen E.
Shroff, Gautam R.
Singer, Adam J.
Smith, Stephen W.
Ischemic ST‐Segment Depression Maximal in V1–V4 (Versus V5–V6) of Any Amplitude Is Specific for Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (Versus Nonocclusive Ischemia)
title Ischemic ST‐Segment Depression Maximal in V1–V4 (Versus V5–V6) of Any Amplitude Is Specific for Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (Versus Nonocclusive Ischemia)
title_full Ischemic ST‐Segment Depression Maximal in V1–V4 (Versus V5–V6) of Any Amplitude Is Specific for Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (Versus Nonocclusive Ischemia)
title_fullStr Ischemic ST‐Segment Depression Maximal in V1–V4 (Versus V5–V6) of Any Amplitude Is Specific for Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (Versus Nonocclusive Ischemia)
title_full_unstemmed Ischemic ST‐Segment Depression Maximal in V1–V4 (Versus V5–V6) of Any Amplitude Is Specific for Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (Versus Nonocclusive Ischemia)
title_short Ischemic ST‐Segment Depression Maximal in V1–V4 (Versus V5–V6) of Any Amplitude Is Specific for Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (Versus Nonocclusive Ischemia)
title_sort ischemic st‐segment depression maximal in v1–v4 (versus v5–v6) of any amplitude is specific for occlusion myocardial infarction (versus nonocclusive ischemia)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022866
work_keys_str_mv AT meyershpendell ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia
AT braceyalexander ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia
AT leedaniel ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia
AT lichtenheldandrew ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia
AT liweij ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia
AT singerdanield ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia
AT rollinszach ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia
AT kanejessea ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia
AT doddkennethw ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia
AT meyerskristene ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia
AT shroffgautamr ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia
AT singeradamj ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia
AT smithstephenw ischemicstsegmentdepressionmaximalinv1v4versusv5v6ofanyamplitudeisspecificforocclusionmyocardialinfarctionversusnonocclusiveischemia