Cargando…

Relationship Between the Ratio of Acceleration Time/Ejection Time and Mortality in Patients With High‐Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND: The ratio of acceleration time/ejection time (AT/ET) is a simple and reproducible echocardiographic parameter that integrates aortic stenosis severity and its consequences on the left ventricle. No study has specifically assessed the prognostic impact of AT/ET on outcome in patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altes, Alexandre, Thellier, Nicolas, Bohbot, Yohann, Ringle Griguer, Anne, Verdun, Stéphane, Levy, Franck, Castel, Anne Laure, Delelis, François, Mailliet, Amandine, Tribouilloy, Christophe, Maréchaux, Sylvestre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34845911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021873
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The ratio of acceleration time/ejection time (AT/ET) is a simple and reproducible echocardiographic parameter that integrates aortic stenosis severity and its consequences on the left ventricle. No study has specifically assessed the prognostic impact of AT/ET on outcome in patients with high‐gradient severe aortic stenosis (SAS) and no or mild symptoms. We sought to evaluate the relationship between AT/ET and mortality and determine the best predictive AT/ET cutoff value in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 353 patients (median age, 79 years; 46% women) with high‐gradient (mean pressure gradient ≥40 mm Hg and/or aortic peak jet velocity ≥4 m/s) SAS, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, and no or mild symptoms were studied. The impact of AT/ET ≤0.35 or >0.35 on all‐cause mortality was retrospectively studied. During a median follow‐up of 39 (25th–75th percentile, 23–62) months, 70 patients died. AT/ET >0.35 was associated with a considerable increased mortality risk after adjustment for established prognostic factors in SAS under medical and/or surgical management (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.54; 95% CI, 1.47–4.37; P<0.001) or conservative management (adjusted HR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.70–6.39; P<0.001). Moreover, AT/ET >0.35 improved the predictive performance of models including established risk factors in SAS with better global model fit, reclassification, and discrimination. After propensity matching, increased mortality risk persisted when AT/ET >0.35 (adjusted HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.12–3.90; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AT/ET >0.35 is a strong predictor of outcome in patients with SAS and no or only mild symptoms and identifies a subgroup of patients at higher risk of death who may derive benefit from earlier aortic valve replacement.