Cargando…

Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been considered the gold standard for left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus detection. Nevertheless, TEE may sometimes induce discomfort and cause complications. Cardiac computed tomography has been studied extensively for LAA thrombus detection....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Shandong, Zhang, Heping, Li, Hongwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022505
_version_ 1784701675204771840
author Yu, Shandong
Zhang, Heping
Li, Hongwei
author_facet Yu, Shandong
Zhang, Heping
Li, Hongwei
author_sort Yu, Shandong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been considered the gold standard for left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus detection. Nevertheless, TEE may sometimes induce discomfort and cause complications. Cardiac computed tomography has been studied extensively for LAA thrombus detection. We performed this systemic review and meta‐analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography for LAA thrombus detection compared with TEE. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systemic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1977 to February 2021. Studies performed for assessment diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography on LAA thrombus compared with TEE were included. Summary sensitivity, specificity, and posterior probability of LAA thrombus was calculated by using bivariate random‐effects model. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool was used for the quality assessment. A total of 27 studies involving 6960 patients were included in our study. The summary sensitivity of early imaging studies was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.79–0.99), and the specificity was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85–0.92). The positive posterior probability was 19.11%, and the negative posterior probability was 0.16%. The summary sensitivity of delayed imaging studies was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.92–1.00), and the specificity was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98–1.00). The positive posterior probability was 95.76%, and the negative posterior probability was 0.12%. The delayed imaging method significantly improved the specificity (1.00 versus 0.89; P<0.05) and positive posterior probability (95.76% versus 19.11%; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac computed tomography with a delayed imaging is a reliable alternative to TEE. It may save the patient and health care from an excess TEE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO; Unique identifier: CRD42021236352.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9075398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90753982022-05-10 Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis Yu, Shandong Zhang, Heping Li, Hongwei J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been considered the gold standard for left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus detection. Nevertheless, TEE may sometimes induce discomfort and cause complications. Cardiac computed tomography has been studied extensively for LAA thrombus detection. We performed this systemic review and meta‐analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography for LAA thrombus detection compared with TEE. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systemic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1977 to February 2021. Studies performed for assessment diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography on LAA thrombus compared with TEE were included. Summary sensitivity, specificity, and posterior probability of LAA thrombus was calculated by using bivariate random‐effects model. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool was used for the quality assessment. A total of 27 studies involving 6960 patients were included in our study. The summary sensitivity of early imaging studies was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.79–0.99), and the specificity was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85–0.92). The positive posterior probability was 19.11%, and the negative posterior probability was 0.16%. The summary sensitivity of delayed imaging studies was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.92–1.00), and the specificity was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98–1.00). The positive posterior probability was 95.76%, and the negative posterior probability was 0.12%. The delayed imaging method significantly improved the specificity (1.00 versus 0.89; P<0.05) and positive posterior probability (95.76% versus 19.11%; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac computed tomography with a delayed imaging is a reliable alternative to TEE. It may save the patient and health care from an excess TEE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO; Unique identifier: CRD42021236352. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9075398/ /pubmed/34796743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022505 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Yu, Shandong
Zhang, Heping
Li, Hongwei
Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort cardiac computed tomography versus transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of left atrial appendage thrombus: a systemic review and meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022505
work_keys_str_mv AT yushandong cardiaccomputedtomographyversustransesophagealechocardiographyforthedetectionofleftatrialappendagethrombusasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangheping cardiaccomputedtomographyversustransesophagealechocardiographyforthedetectionofleftatrialappendagethrombusasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihongwei cardiaccomputedtomographyversustransesophagealechocardiographyforthedetectionofleftatrialappendagethrombusasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis