Cargando…
Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis
BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been considered the gold standard for left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus detection. Nevertheless, TEE may sometimes induce discomfort and cause complications. Cardiac computed tomography has been studied extensively for LAA thrombus detection....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022505 |
_version_ | 1784701675204771840 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Shandong Zhang, Heping Li, Hongwei |
author_facet | Yu, Shandong Zhang, Heping Li, Hongwei |
author_sort | Yu, Shandong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been considered the gold standard for left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus detection. Nevertheless, TEE may sometimes induce discomfort and cause complications. Cardiac computed tomography has been studied extensively for LAA thrombus detection. We performed this systemic review and meta‐analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography for LAA thrombus detection compared with TEE. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systemic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1977 to February 2021. Studies performed for assessment diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography on LAA thrombus compared with TEE were included. Summary sensitivity, specificity, and posterior probability of LAA thrombus was calculated by using bivariate random‐effects model. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool was used for the quality assessment. A total of 27 studies involving 6960 patients were included in our study. The summary sensitivity of early imaging studies was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.79–0.99), and the specificity was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85–0.92). The positive posterior probability was 19.11%, and the negative posterior probability was 0.16%. The summary sensitivity of delayed imaging studies was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.92–1.00), and the specificity was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98–1.00). The positive posterior probability was 95.76%, and the negative posterior probability was 0.12%. The delayed imaging method significantly improved the specificity (1.00 versus 0.89; P<0.05) and positive posterior probability (95.76% versus 19.11%; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac computed tomography with a delayed imaging is a reliable alternative to TEE. It may save the patient and health care from an excess TEE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO; Unique identifier: CRD42021236352. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9075398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90753982022-05-10 Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis Yu, Shandong Zhang, Heping Li, Hongwei J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been considered the gold standard for left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus detection. Nevertheless, TEE may sometimes induce discomfort and cause complications. Cardiac computed tomography has been studied extensively for LAA thrombus detection. We performed this systemic review and meta‐analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography for LAA thrombus detection compared with TEE. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systemic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1977 to February 2021. Studies performed for assessment diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography on LAA thrombus compared with TEE were included. Summary sensitivity, specificity, and posterior probability of LAA thrombus was calculated by using bivariate random‐effects model. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool was used for the quality assessment. A total of 27 studies involving 6960 patients were included in our study. The summary sensitivity of early imaging studies was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.79–0.99), and the specificity was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85–0.92). The positive posterior probability was 19.11%, and the negative posterior probability was 0.16%. The summary sensitivity of delayed imaging studies was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.92–1.00), and the specificity was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98–1.00). The positive posterior probability was 95.76%, and the negative posterior probability was 0.12%. The delayed imaging method significantly improved the specificity (1.00 versus 0.89; P<0.05) and positive posterior probability (95.76% versus 19.11%; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac computed tomography with a delayed imaging is a reliable alternative to TEE. It may save the patient and health care from an excess TEE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO; Unique identifier: CRD42021236352. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9075398/ /pubmed/34796743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022505 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis Yu, Shandong Zhang, Heping Li, Hongwei Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title | Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_full | Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_fullStr | Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_short | Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_sort | cardiac computed tomography versus transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of left atrial appendage thrombus: a systemic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022505 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yushandong cardiaccomputedtomographyversustransesophagealechocardiographyforthedetectionofleftatrialappendagethrombusasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangheping cardiaccomputedtomographyversustransesophagealechocardiographyforthedetectionofleftatrialappendagethrombusasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lihongwei cardiaccomputedtomographyversustransesophagealechocardiographyforthedetectionofleftatrialappendagethrombusasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis |