Cargando…
Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index
INTRODUCTION: Academia uses scholarly metrics, such as the h-index, to make hiring, promotion, and funding decisions. These high-stakes decisions require that those using scholarly metrics be able to recognize, interpret, critically assess and effectively and ethically use them. This study aimed to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35522678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268110 |
_version_ | 1784701737667395584 |
---|---|
author | Maggio, Lauren A. Jeffrey, Alyssa Haustein, Stefanie Samuel, Anita |
author_facet | Maggio, Lauren A. Jeffrey, Alyssa Haustein, Stefanie Samuel, Anita |
author_sort | Maggio, Lauren A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Academia uses scholarly metrics, such as the h-index, to make hiring, promotion, and funding decisions. These high-stakes decisions require that those using scholarly metrics be able to recognize, interpret, critically assess and effectively and ethically use them. This study aimed to characterize educational videos about the h-index to understand available resources and provide recommendations for future educational initiatives. METHODS: The authors analyzed videos on the h-index posted to YouTube. Videos were identified by searching YouTube and were screened by two authors. To code the videos the authors created a coding sheet, which assessed content and presentation style with a focus on the videos’ educational quality based on Cognitive Load Theory. Two authors coded each video independently with discrepancies resolved by group consensus. RESULTS: Thirty-one videos met inclusion criteria. Twenty-one videos (68%) were screencasts and seven used a “talking head” approach. Twenty-six videos defined the h-index (83%) and provided examples of how to calculate and find it. The importance of the h-index in high-stakes decisions was raised in 14 (45%) videos. Sixteen videos (52%) described caveats about using the h-index, with potential disadvantages to early researchers the most prevalent (n = 7; 23%). All videos incorporated various educational approaches with potential impact on viewer cognitive load. A minority of videos (n = 10; 32%) displayed professional production quality. DISCUSSION: The videos featured content with potential to enhance viewers’ metrics literacies such that many defined the h-index and described its calculation, providing viewers with skills to recognize and interpret the metric. However, less than half described the h-index as an author quality indicator, which has been contested, and caveats about h-index use were inconsistently presented, suggesting room for improvement. While most videos integrated practices to facilitate balancing viewers’ cognitive load, few (32%) were of professional production quality. Some videos missed opportunities to adopt particular practices that could benefit learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9075661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90756612022-05-07 Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index Maggio, Lauren A. Jeffrey, Alyssa Haustein, Stefanie Samuel, Anita PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Academia uses scholarly metrics, such as the h-index, to make hiring, promotion, and funding decisions. These high-stakes decisions require that those using scholarly metrics be able to recognize, interpret, critically assess and effectively and ethically use them. This study aimed to characterize educational videos about the h-index to understand available resources and provide recommendations for future educational initiatives. METHODS: The authors analyzed videos on the h-index posted to YouTube. Videos were identified by searching YouTube and were screened by two authors. To code the videos the authors created a coding sheet, which assessed content and presentation style with a focus on the videos’ educational quality based on Cognitive Load Theory. Two authors coded each video independently with discrepancies resolved by group consensus. RESULTS: Thirty-one videos met inclusion criteria. Twenty-one videos (68%) were screencasts and seven used a “talking head” approach. Twenty-six videos defined the h-index (83%) and provided examples of how to calculate and find it. The importance of the h-index in high-stakes decisions was raised in 14 (45%) videos. Sixteen videos (52%) described caveats about using the h-index, with potential disadvantages to early researchers the most prevalent (n = 7; 23%). All videos incorporated various educational approaches with potential impact on viewer cognitive load. A minority of videos (n = 10; 32%) displayed professional production quality. DISCUSSION: The videos featured content with potential to enhance viewers’ metrics literacies such that many defined the h-index and described its calculation, providing viewers with skills to recognize and interpret the metric. However, less than half described the h-index as an author quality indicator, which has been contested, and caveats about h-index use were inconsistently presented, suggesting room for improvement. While most videos integrated practices to facilitate balancing viewers’ cognitive load, few (32%) were of professional production quality. Some videos missed opportunities to adopt particular practices that could benefit learning. Public Library of Science 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9075661/ /pubmed/35522678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268110 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Maggio, Lauren A. Jeffrey, Alyssa Haustein, Stefanie Samuel, Anita Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index |
title | Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index |
title_full | Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index |
title_fullStr | Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index |
title_full_unstemmed | Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index |
title_short | Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index |
title_sort | becoming metrics literate: an analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35522678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maggiolaurena becomingmetricsliterateananalysisofbriefvideosthatteachaboutthehindex AT jeffreyalyssa becomingmetricsliterateananalysisofbriefvideosthatteachaboutthehindex AT hausteinstefanie becomingmetricsliterateananalysisofbriefvideosthatteachaboutthehindex AT samuelanita becomingmetricsliterateananalysisofbriefvideosthatteachaboutthehindex |