Cargando…

Machine Learning Models for Classifying High- and Low-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Quality of Reporting Analysis

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review, assess the reporting quality of, and discuss improvement opportunities for studies describing machine learning (ML) models for glioma grade prediction. METHODS: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahar, Ryan C., Merkaj, Sara, Cassinelli Petersen, Gabriel I., Tillmanns, Niklas, Subramanian, Harry, Brim, Waverly Rose, Zeevi, Tal, Staib, Lawrence, Kazarian, Eve, Lin, MingDe, Bousabarah, Khaled, Huttner, Anita J., Pala, Andrej, Payabvash, Seyedmehdi, Ivanidze, Jana, Cui, Jin, Malhotra, Ajay, Aboian, Mariam S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9076130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35530302
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.856231
_version_ 1784701844826619904
author Bahar, Ryan C.
Merkaj, Sara
Cassinelli Petersen, Gabriel I.
Tillmanns, Niklas
Subramanian, Harry
Brim, Waverly Rose
Zeevi, Tal
Staib, Lawrence
Kazarian, Eve
Lin, MingDe
Bousabarah, Khaled
Huttner, Anita J.
Pala, Andrej
Payabvash, Seyedmehdi
Ivanidze, Jana
Cui, Jin
Malhotra, Ajay
Aboian, Mariam S.
author_facet Bahar, Ryan C.
Merkaj, Sara
Cassinelli Petersen, Gabriel I.
Tillmanns, Niklas
Subramanian, Harry
Brim, Waverly Rose
Zeevi, Tal
Staib, Lawrence
Kazarian, Eve
Lin, MingDe
Bousabarah, Khaled
Huttner, Anita J.
Pala, Andrej
Payabvash, Seyedmehdi
Ivanidze, Jana
Cui, Jin
Malhotra, Ajay
Aboian, Mariam S.
author_sort Bahar, Ryan C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically review, assess the reporting quality of, and discuss improvement opportunities for studies describing machine learning (ML) models for glioma grade prediction. METHODS: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) statement. A systematic search was performed in September 2020, and repeated in January 2021, on four databases: Embase, Medline, CENTRAL, and Web of Science Core Collection. Publications were screened in Covidence, and reporting quality was measured against the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) Statement. Descriptive statistics were calculated using GraphPad Prism 9. RESULTS: The search identified 11,727 candidate articles with 1,135 articles undergoing full text review and 85 included in analysis. 67 (79%) articles were published between 2018-2021. The mean prediction accuracy of the best performing model in each study was 0.89 ± 0.09. The most common algorithm for conventional machine learning studies was Support Vector Machine (mean accuracy: 0.90 ± 0.07) and for deep learning studies was Convolutional Neural Network (mean accuracy: 0.91 ± 0.10). Only one study used both a large training dataset (n>200) and external validation (accuracy: 0.72) for their model. The mean adherence rate to TRIPOD was 44.5% ± 11.1%, with poor reporting adherence for model performance (0%), abstracts (0%), and titles (0%). CONCLUSIONS: The application of ML to glioma grade prediction has grown substantially, with ML model studies reporting high predictive accuracies but lacking essential metrics and characteristics for assessing model performance. Several domains, including generalizability and reproducibility, warrant further attention to enable translation into clinical practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020209938.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9076130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90761302022-05-07 Machine Learning Models for Classifying High- and Low-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Quality of Reporting Analysis Bahar, Ryan C. Merkaj, Sara Cassinelli Petersen, Gabriel I. Tillmanns, Niklas Subramanian, Harry Brim, Waverly Rose Zeevi, Tal Staib, Lawrence Kazarian, Eve Lin, MingDe Bousabarah, Khaled Huttner, Anita J. Pala, Andrej Payabvash, Seyedmehdi Ivanidze, Jana Cui, Jin Malhotra, Ajay Aboian, Mariam S. Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: To systematically review, assess the reporting quality of, and discuss improvement opportunities for studies describing machine learning (ML) models for glioma grade prediction. METHODS: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) statement. A systematic search was performed in September 2020, and repeated in January 2021, on four databases: Embase, Medline, CENTRAL, and Web of Science Core Collection. Publications were screened in Covidence, and reporting quality was measured against the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) Statement. Descriptive statistics were calculated using GraphPad Prism 9. RESULTS: The search identified 11,727 candidate articles with 1,135 articles undergoing full text review and 85 included in analysis. 67 (79%) articles were published between 2018-2021. The mean prediction accuracy of the best performing model in each study was 0.89 ± 0.09. The most common algorithm for conventional machine learning studies was Support Vector Machine (mean accuracy: 0.90 ± 0.07) and for deep learning studies was Convolutional Neural Network (mean accuracy: 0.91 ± 0.10). Only one study used both a large training dataset (n>200) and external validation (accuracy: 0.72) for their model. The mean adherence rate to TRIPOD was 44.5% ± 11.1%, with poor reporting adherence for model performance (0%), abstracts (0%), and titles (0%). CONCLUSIONS: The application of ML to glioma grade prediction has grown substantially, with ML model studies reporting high predictive accuracies but lacking essential metrics and characteristics for assessing model performance. Several domains, including generalizability and reproducibility, warrant further attention to enable translation into clinical practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020209938. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9076130/ /pubmed/35530302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.856231 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bahar, Merkaj, Cassinelli Petersen, Tillmanns, Subramanian, Brim, Zeevi, Staib, Kazarian, Lin, Bousabarah, Huttner, Pala, Payabvash, Ivanidze, Cui, Malhotra and Aboian https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Bahar, Ryan C.
Merkaj, Sara
Cassinelli Petersen, Gabriel I.
Tillmanns, Niklas
Subramanian, Harry
Brim, Waverly Rose
Zeevi, Tal
Staib, Lawrence
Kazarian, Eve
Lin, MingDe
Bousabarah, Khaled
Huttner, Anita J.
Pala, Andrej
Payabvash, Seyedmehdi
Ivanidze, Jana
Cui, Jin
Malhotra, Ajay
Aboian, Mariam S.
Machine Learning Models for Classifying High- and Low-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Quality of Reporting Analysis
title Machine Learning Models for Classifying High- and Low-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Quality of Reporting Analysis
title_full Machine Learning Models for Classifying High- and Low-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Quality of Reporting Analysis
title_fullStr Machine Learning Models for Classifying High- and Low-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Quality of Reporting Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Models for Classifying High- and Low-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Quality of Reporting Analysis
title_short Machine Learning Models for Classifying High- and Low-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Quality of Reporting Analysis
title_sort machine learning models for classifying high- and low-grade gliomas: a systematic review and quality of reporting analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9076130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35530302
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.856231
work_keys_str_mv AT baharryanc machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT merkajsara machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT cassinellipetersengabrieli machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT tillmannsniklas machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT subramanianharry machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT brimwaverlyrose machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT zeevital machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT staiblawrence machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT kazarianeve machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT linmingde machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT bousabarahkhaled machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT huttneranitaj machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT palaandrej machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT payabvashseyedmehdi machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT ivanidzejana machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT cuijin machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT malhotraajay machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis
AT aboianmariams machinelearningmodelsforclassifyinghighandlowgradegliomasasystematicreviewandqualityofreportinganalysis