Cargando…

An Evaluation of the NICCI Monitor in Providing Continuous, Noninvasive Blood Pressure Readings in Children During Intraoperative Anesthetic Care

BACKGROUND: In specific clinical scenarios or with patient comorbid conditions, continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring may be required as it can be expected to provide superior physiologic monitoring to intermittent techniques. However, continuous BP monitoring requires an arterial cannula (AC) p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bekiroglu, Ismail, Owusu-Bediako, Kwaku, Rice-Weimer, Julie, Tobias, Joseph D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9076136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573930
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4723
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: In specific clinical scenarios or with patient comorbid conditions, continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring may be required as it can be expected to provide superior physiologic monitoring to intermittent techniques. However, continuous BP monitoring requires an arterial cannula (AC) placement, which may be time-consuming, technically challenging, or associated with adverse events. Various noninvasive BP devices have been developed which provide a continuous BP reading. The current study evaluates the accuracy of a novel continuous BP device, the NICCI monitor (NM), in pediatric patients weighing 10 - 40 kg. METHODS: The study cohort included pediatric patients weighing between 10 and 40 kg, scheduled for surgery for which placement of an AC was planned. Systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial (MAP) blood pressure readings were captured from the AC and the NM every second during anesthetic care. RESULTS: The study cohort included 24 pediatric patients undergoing major orthopedic, cardiac, and neurosurgical procedures. A total of 146,562 pairs of SBP, DBP, and MAP values from the AC and NC were analyzed. The absolute difference for the NM and the AC’s SBP, DBP, and MAP values were 11 ± 9, 10 ± 7, and 10 ± 7 mm Hg, respectively. The difference between the BP values from the NM and the AC was ≤ 10 mm Hg for 57% of the SBP readings, 60% of the DBP readings, and 56% of the MAP readings. The bias was 4, 4, and 6 mm Hg for the SBP, DBP, and MAP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were some technical limitations given patient size, potentially resulting in variation in accuracy, the NM provided a continuous noninvasive BP measurement within clinically useful limits during a significant portion of anesthetic care compared to values obtained from an AC. Ongoing modification of the technology to improve its application in pediatric patients will likely increase its accuracy.