Normative Values for Adolescent Quality of Life in Plastic Surgery: A Longitudinal, Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a challenging time, and an increasing number of young people are seeking plastic surgery. With the rise of health-related quality of life studies in plastic surgery, it is critical to understand the natural variation and changes in health-related quality of life for this population. METHODS: In this longitudinal, cohort study validated surveys were administered to cisgender participants aged 12–21 years: Short-Form 36v2, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Breast-Related Symptoms Questionnaire, and Eating-Attitudes Test-26. Surveys were administered at baseline and up to 9 years follow-up. At the time of enrollment, participants were in a current state of good health with no considerable past or current medical, surgical, or psychological history. RESULTS: A total of 149 female and 75 male participants were included, with a median (interquartile range) baseline age of 16.0 (4.4) years and follow-up time of 3.3 (4.1) years. Over the study period, girls who were not overweight or obese experienced significant declines in five SF-36 domains (general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health) and on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Breast-Related Symptoms Questionnaire, and Eating-Attitudes Test-26 (P < 0.05). In contrast, boys’ and overweight/obese girls’ health-related quality of life largely remained stable (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adolescence is a challenging time, on which plastic surgery-related concerns are superimposed. Our findings suggest that girls may be more at risk for developing psychosocial deficits that worsen over adolescence and young adulthood. This observation is critical for the interpretation and contextualization of health-related quality of life in adolescent plastic surgery patients.