Resuscitation practices in hospitals caring for children: Insights from get with the guidelines-resuscitation

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation practices in pediatric hospitals have not been compared, and whether practices differ between freestanding pediatric only hospitals and combined hospitals (which care for adults and children) is unknown. METHODS: We surveyed hospitals that submit data on pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) to Get-With-The Guidelines®-Resuscitation, to elicit information on resuscitation practices. Hospitals were categorized as pediatric only and combined hospitals, and rates of resuscitation practices were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-three hospitals with ≥5 IHCA events between 2017–2019 completed the survey, of which 9 (27.3%) were pediatric only and 24 (72.7%) were combined hospitals. Overall, 18 (54.5%) hospitals used a device to measure chest compression quality, 16 (48.5%) had a staff member monitor chest compression quality, 10 (30.3%) used lanyards or hats to designate code leaders during a resuscitation, 16 (48.5%) routinely conducted code debriefings immediately after a resuscitation, and 7 (21.2%) conducted mock codes at least quarterly with 17 (51.5%) reporting no set schedule. Pediatric only hospitals were more likely to employ a device to measure chest compressions (88.9% vs. 41.7%; P = 0.02), conduct code debriefings always or frequently after resuscitations (77.8% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.04), use lanyards or a hat to designate the code team leader during resuscitations (66.7% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.006), and allow nurses to defibrillate using an AED (77.8% vs. 29.2%, P = 0.01). There were no differences in simulation frequency or other resuscitation practices between the two hospital groups. CONCLUSIONS: Across hospitals caring for children, substantial variation exists in resuscitation practices, with notable differences between pediatric only and combined hospitals.