Cargando…

Evaluation of Federal Policy Changes to the Hospice Benefit and Use of Hospice for Persons With ADRD

IMPORTANCE: Hospice is an important end-of-life service for patients with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospice use among patients with ADRD changed in association with recent policies aimed at reducing hospice misuse and long hospice stays, an outco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gianattasio, Kan Z., Moghtaderi, Ali, Lupu, Dale, Prather, Christina, Power, Melinda C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0900
_version_ 1784702127039315968
author Gianattasio, Kan Z.
Moghtaderi, Ali
Lupu, Dale
Prather, Christina
Power, Melinda C.
author_facet Gianattasio, Kan Z.
Moghtaderi, Ali
Lupu, Dale
Prather, Christina
Power, Melinda C.
author_sort Gianattasio, Kan Z.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Hospice is an important end-of-life service for patients with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospice use among patients with ADRD changed in association with recent policies aimed at reducing hospice misuse and long hospice stays, an outcome that may have disproportionately affected patients with ADRD because of their lengthy end-of-life trajectories. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational cross-sectional study used Medicare hospice claims data from Medicare hospice episodes of care beginning between July 2008 and December 2019 among Medicare hospice beneficiaries 65 years or older at time of enrollment. Data analysis was conducted between September 2019 and June 2021. EXPOSURES: The 2014 Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation (IMPACT) Act, which systematized audits of hospices with a high proportion of long stays, and the 2016 2-tier payment system, which reduced daily reimbursement rates after 60 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Monthly percentage of (1) new patient enrollees, (2) patient census, and (3) care days provided to patients with an ADRD code. RESULTS: The sample included 11 124 992 unique hospice episodes between 2008 and 2019; mean (SD) patient enrollment age ranged from 82.0 (8.2) years to 82.8 (8.7) years; the percentage of male patients ranged from 40.5% to 42.7%, and the percentage of Black, Hispanic, and White patients ranged from 7.7% to 8.2%, 1.5% to 2.0%, and 86.2% to 88.8%, respectively, across years. The percentage of new enrollees with an ADRD code dropped significantly during the months of IMPACT passage (−1.42 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.13 to −0.71) and implementation (−1.98 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.70 to −1.26) but rose again during the following months. While no significant changes were observed at the time of 2-tier payment implementation (0.15 percentage points; 95% CI, −0.21 to 0.51), the average rate of increase during the subsequent period was slower (0.01 percentage points per month; 95% CI, 0-0.02) than in earlier periods (0.05; 95% CI, 0.04-0.06 during the baseline period). Similar patterns were observed for the percentage of patient census and care days provided to patients with an ADRD code. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this cross-sectional study of Medicare hospice claims data suggested that recent Medicare policies were associated with immediate and lasting reductions in the share of patients receiving hospice care with an ADRD code compared with expectations from preimplementation trends. Future research should examine mechanisms through which hospices enacted change and consequences for quality of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9077487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90774872022-05-24 Evaluation of Federal Policy Changes to the Hospice Benefit and Use of Hospice for Persons With ADRD Gianattasio, Kan Z. Moghtaderi, Ali Lupu, Dale Prather, Christina Power, Melinda C. JAMA Health Forum Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Hospice is an important end-of-life service for patients with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospice use among patients with ADRD changed in association with recent policies aimed at reducing hospice misuse and long hospice stays, an outcome that may have disproportionately affected patients with ADRD because of their lengthy end-of-life trajectories. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational cross-sectional study used Medicare hospice claims data from Medicare hospice episodes of care beginning between July 2008 and December 2019 among Medicare hospice beneficiaries 65 years or older at time of enrollment. Data analysis was conducted between September 2019 and June 2021. EXPOSURES: The 2014 Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation (IMPACT) Act, which systematized audits of hospices with a high proportion of long stays, and the 2016 2-tier payment system, which reduced daily reimbursement rates after 60 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Monthly percentage of (1) new patient enrollees, (2) patient census, and (3) care days provided to patients with an ADRD code. RESULTS: The sample included 11 124 992 unique hospice episodes between 2008 and 2019; mean (SD) patient enrollment age ranged from 82.0 (8.2) years to 82.8 (8.7) years; the percentage of male patients ranged from 40.5% to 42.7%, and the percentage of Black, Hispanic, and White patients ranged from 7.7% to 8.2%, 1.5% to 2.0%, and 86.2% to 88.8%, respectively, across years. The percentage of new enrollees with an ADRD code dropped significantly during the months of IMPACT passage (−1.42 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.13 to −0.71) and implementation (−1.98 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.70 to −1.26) but rose again during the following months. While no significant changes were observed at the time of 2-tier payment implementation (0.15 percentage points; 95% CI, −0.21 to 0.51), the average rate of increase during the subsequent period was slower (0.01 percentage points per month; 95% CI, 0-0.02) than in earlier periods (0.05; 95% CI, 0.04-0.06 during the baseline period). Similar patterns were observed for the percentage of patient census and care days provided to patients with an ADRD code. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this cross-sectional study of Medicare hospice claims data suggested that recent Medicare policies were associated with immediate and lasting reductions in the share of patients receiving hospice care with an ADRD code compared with expectations from preimplementation trends. Future research should examine mechanisms through which hospices enacted change and consequences for quality of care. American Medical Association 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9077487/ /pubmed/35977261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0900 Text en Copyright 2022 Gianattasio KZ et al. JAMA Health Forum. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Gianattasio, Kan Z.
Moghtaderi, Ali
Lupu, Dale
Prather, Christina
Power, Melinda C.
Evaluation of Federal Policy Changes to the Hospice Benefit and Use of Hospice for Persons With ADRD
title Evaluation of Federal Policy Changes to the Hospice Benefit and Use of Hospice for Persons With ADRD
title_full Evaluation of Federal Policy Changes to the Hospice Benefit and Use of Hospice for Persons With ADRD
title_fullStr Evaluation of Federal Policy Changes to the Hospice Benefit and Use of Hospice for Persons With ADRD
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Federal Policy Changes to the Hospice Benefit and Use of Hospice for Persons With ADRD
title_short Evaluation of Federal Policy Changes to the Hospice Benefit and Use of Hospice for Persons With ADRD
title_sort evaluation of federal policy changes to the hospice benefit and use of hospice for persons with adrd
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0900
work_keys_str_mv AT gianattasiokanz evaluationoffederalpolicychangestothehospicebenefitanduseofhospiceforpersonswithadrd
AT moghtaderiali evaluationoffederalpolicychangestothehospicebenefitanduseofhospiceforpersonswithadrd
AT lupudale evaluationoffederalpolicychangestothehospicebenefitanduseofhospiceforpersonswithadrd
AT pratherchristina evaluationoffederalpolicychangestothehospicebenefitanduseofhospiceforpersonswithadrd
AT powermelindac evaluationoffederalpolicychangestothehospicebenefitanduseofhospiceforpersonswithadrd