Cargando…
Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Recently, an increasing number of cohort studies have suggested using machine learning (ML) to predict type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, its predictive ability remains inconclusive. This meta‐analysis evaluated the current ability of ML algorithms for predicting incident type 2 d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13736 |
_version_ | 1784702172798124032 |
---|---|
author | Kodama, Satoru Fujihara, Kazuya Horikawa, Chika Kitazawa, Masaru Iwanaga, Midori Kato, Kiminori Watanabe, Kenichi Nakagawa, Yoshimi Matsuzaka, Takashi Shimano, Hitoshi Sone, Hirohito |
author_facet | Kodama, Satoru Fujihara, Kazuya Horikawa, Chika Kitazawa, Masaru Iwanaga, Midori Kato, Kiminori Watanabe, Kenichi Nakagawa, Yoshimi Matsuzaka, Takashi Shimano, Hitoshi Sone, Hirohito |
author_sort | Kodama, Satoru |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Recently, an increasing number of cohort studies have suggested using machine learning (ML) to predict type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, its predictive ability remains inconclusive. This meta‐analysis evaluated the current ability of ML algorithms for predicting incident type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched longitudinal studies published from 1 January 1950 to 17 May 2020 using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Included studies had to compare ML’s classification with the actual incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and present data on the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives. The dataset for these four values was pooled with a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic and a bivariate random effects model. RESULTS: There were 12 eligible studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67–0.90), 0.82 [95% CI 0.74–0.88], 4.55 [95% CI 3.07–6.75] and 0.23 [95% CI 0.13–0.42], respectively. The area under the summarized receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Current ML algorithms have sufficient ability to help clinicians determine whether individuals will develop type 2 diabetes mellitus in the future. However, persons should be cautious before changing their attitude toward future diabetes risk after learning the result of the diabetes prediction test using ML algorithms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9077721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90777212022-05-13 Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis Kodama, Satoru Fujihara, Kazuya Horikawa, Chika Kitazawa, Masaru Iwanaga, Midori Kato, Kiminori Watanabe, Kenichi Nakagawa, Yoshimi Matsuzaka, Takashi Shimano, Hitoshi Sone, Hirohito J Diabetes Investig Original Articles AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Recently, an increasing number of cohort studies have suggested using machine learning (ML) to predict type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, its predictive ability remains inconclusive. This meta‐analysis evaluated the current ability of ML algorithms for predicting incident type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched longitudinal studies published from 1 January 1950 to 17 May 2020 using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Included studies had to compare ML’s classification with the actual incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and present data on the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives. The dataset for these four values was pooled with a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic and a bivariate random effects model. RESULTS: There were 12 eligible studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67–0.90), 0.82 [95% CI 0.74–0.88], 4.55 [95% CI 3.07–6.75] and 0.23 [95% CI 0.13–0.42], respectively. The area under the summarized receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Current ML algorithms have sufficient ability to help clinicians determine whether individuals will develop type 2 diabetes mellitus in the future. However, persons should be cautious before changing their attitude toward future diabetes risk after learning the result of the diabetes prediction test using ML algorithms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-28 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9077721/ /pubmed/34942059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13736 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kodama, Satoru Fujihara, Kazuya Horikawa, Chika Kitazawa, Masaru Iwanaga, Midori Kato, Kiminori Watanabe, Kenichi Nakagawa, Yoshimi Matsuzaka, Takashi Shimano, Hitoshi Sone, Hirohito Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis |
title | Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis |
title_full | Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis |
title_short | Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis |
title_sort | predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta‐analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kodamasatoru predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis AT fujiharakazuya predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis AT horikawachika predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis AT kitazawamasaru predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis AT iwanagamidori predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis AT katokiminori predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis AT watanabekenichi predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis AT nakagawayoshimi predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis AT matsuzakatakashi predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis AT shimanohitoshi predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis AT sonehirohito predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis |