Cargando…

Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Recently, an increasing number of cohort studies have suggested using machine learning (ML) to predict type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, its predictive ability remains inconclusive. This meta‐analysis evaluated the current ability of ML algorithms for predicting incident type 2 d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kodama, Satoru, Fujihara, Kazuya, Horikawa, Chika, Kitazawa, Masaru, Iwanaga, Midori, Kato, Kiminori, Watanabe, Kenichi, Nakagawa, Yoshimi, Matsuzaka, Takashi, Shimano, Hitoshi, Sone, Hirohito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13736
_version_ 1784702172798124032
author Kodama, Satoru
Fujihara, Kazuya
Horikawa, Chika
Kitazawa, Masaru
Iwanaga, Midori
Kato, Kiminori
Watanabe, Kenichi
Nakagawa, Yoshimi
Matsuzaka, Takashi
Shimano, Hitoshi
Sone, Hirohito
author_facet Kodama, Satoru
Fujihara, Kazuya
Horikawa, Chika
Kitazawa, Masaru
Iwanaga, Midori
Kato, Kiminori
Watanabe, Kenichi
Nakagawa, Yoshimi
Matsuzaka, Takashi
Shimano, Hitoshi
Sone, Hirohito
author_sort Kodama, Satoru
collection PubMed
description AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Recently, an increasing number of cohort studies have suggested using machine learning (ML) to predict type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, its predictive ability remains inconclusive. This meta‐analysis evaluated the current ability of ML algorithms for predicting incident type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched longitudinal studies published from 1 January 1950 to 17 May 2020 using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Included studies had to compare ML’s classification with the actual incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and present data on the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives. The dataset for these four values was pooled with a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic and a bivariate random effects model. RESULTS: There were 12 eligible studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67–0.90), 0.82 [95% CI 0.74–0.88], 4.55 [95% CI 3.07–6.75] and 0.23 [95% CI 0.13–0.42], respectively. The area under the summarized receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Current ML algorithms have sufficient ability to help clinicians determine whether individuals will develop type 2 diabetes mellitus in the future. However, persons should be cautious before changing their attitude toward future diabetes risk after learning the result of the diabetes prediction test using ML algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9077721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90777212022-05-13 Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis Kodama, Satoru Fujihara, Kazuya Horikawa, Chika Kitazawa, Masaru Iwanaga, Midori Kato, Kiminori Watanabe, Kenichi Nakagawa, Yoshimi Matsuzaka, Takashi Shimano, Hitoshi Sone, Hirohito J Diabetes Investig Original Articles AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Recently, an increasing number of cohort studies have suggested using machine learning (ML) to predict type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, its predictive ability remains inconclusive. This meta‐analysis evaluated the current ability of ML algorithms for predicting incident type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched longitudinal studies published from 1 January 1950 to 17 May 2020 using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Included studies had to compare ML’s classification with the actual incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and present data on the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives. The dataset for these four values was pooled with a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic and a bivariate random effects model. RESULTS: There were 12 eligible studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67–0.90), 0.82 [95% CI 0.74–0.88], 4.55 [95% CI 3.07–6.75] and 0.23 [95% CI 0.13–0.42], respectively. The area under the summarized receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Current ML algorithms have sufficient ability to help clinicians determine whether individuals will develop type 2 diabetes mellitus in the future. However, persons should be cautious before changing their attitude toward future diabetes risk after learning the result of the diabetes prediction test using ML algorithms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-28 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9077721/ /pubmed/34942059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13736 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kodama, Satoru
Fujihara, Kazuya
Horikawa, Chika
Kitazawa, Masaru
Iwanaga, Midori
Kato, Kiminori
Watanabe, Kenichi
Nakagawa, Yoshimi
Matsuzaka, Takashi
Shimano, Hitoshi
Sone, Hirohito
Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis
title Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis
title_full Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis
title_short Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis
title_sort predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta‐analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13736
work_keys_str_mv AT kodamasatoru predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT fujiharakazuya predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT horikawachika predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT kitazawamasaru predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT iwanagamidori predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT katokiminori predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT watanabekenichi predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT nakagawayoshimi predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT matsuzakatakashi predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT shimanohitoshi predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis
AT sonehirohito predictiveabilityofcurrentmachinelearningalgorithmsfortype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysis