Cargando…

Scanning methodology for contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeter (CLOD) dosimetry applying a silicone material

PURPOSE: Contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeters (CLODs) were recently developed as the first in vivo dosimeter that can be worn directly on the eye to measure the dose delivered to the lens during radiotherapy. However, it has an inherent uncertainty because of its curved shape. Newton’s ring e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Son, Jaeman, Cho, Jin Dong, Jung, Seongmoon, Choi, Chang Heon, Park, Jong Min, Kim, Jung-in
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35526041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02056-9
_version_ 1784702204790177792
author Son, Jaeman
Cho, Jin Dong
Jung, Seongmoon
Choi, Chang Heon
Park, Jong Min
Kim, Jung-in
author_facet Son, Jaeman
Cho, Jin Dong
Jung, Seongmoon
Choi, Chang Heon
Park, Jong Min
Kim, Jung-in
author_sort Son, Jaeman
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeters (CLODs) were recently developed as the first in vivo dosimeter that can be worn directly on the eye to measure the dose delivered to the lens during radiotherapy. However, it has an inherent uncertainty because of its curved shape. Newton’s ring effect inevitably occurs because the spacing between the glass window and the active layer is not constant. Furthermore, it involves a large uncertainty because the objective of the CLOD with such morphological characteristics is to measure the dose delivered to an out-of-field lens. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of various compensating materials on the sensitivity, accuracy, and uniformity of analysis using a curved CLOD. We developed a new scanning methodology that involves applying a compensating material to reduce the uncertainty caused by the air gap. METHODS: Four compensating materials—Dragon Skin™ 10 (DS), a transparent silicon material, SORTA-Clear™ 40 (SC), optical grease (OG), and air (no compensating material)—were used in this study. The CLOD was scanned in the reflective mode and transmission mode using each compensating material. We then examined the sensitivity, accuracy, and scan uniformity to evaluate the scanning methodology using compensating materials. RESULTS: The increase in sensitivity was the highest for OG compared to that for air in the reflective mode. On average, the sensitivity in the reflective mode was higher than that in the transmission mode by a factor of 2.5 for each dose. Among the four compensating materials, OG had the smallest uncertainty. Therefore, the best scan uniformity was achieved when OG was used. CONCLUSIONS: Scanning methodology was proposed in which a compensating material is applied for a curved lens-type dosimeter. Our results show that OG is the most suitable compensating material to obtain the best accuracy of dose analysis. Following this methodology, the scan uncertainty of curved dosimeters significantly decreased.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9077864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90778642022-05-08 Scanning methodology for contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeter (CLOD) dosimetry applying a silicone material Son, Jaeman Cho, Jin Dong Jung, Seongmoon Choi, Chang Heon Park, Jong Min Kim, Jung-in Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: Contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeters (CLODs) were recently developed as the first in vivo dosimeter that can be worn directly on the eye to measure the dose delivered to the lens during radiotherapy. However, it has an inherent uncertainty because of its curved shape. Newton’s ring effect inevitably occurs because the spacing between the glass window and the active layer is not constant. Furthermore, it involves a large uncertainty because the objective of the CLOD with such morphological characteristics is to measure the dose delivered to an out-of-field lens. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of various compensating materials on the sensitivity, accuracy, and uniformity of analysis using a curved CLOD. We developed a new scanning methodology that involves applying a compensating material to reduce the uncertainty caused by the air gap. METHODS: Four compensating materials—Dragon Skin™ 10 (DS), a transparent silicon material, SORTA-Clear™ 40 (SC), optical grease (OG), and air (no compensating material)—were used in this study. The CLOD was scanned in the reflective mode and transmission mode using each compensating material. We then examined the sensitivity, accuracy, and scan uniformity to evaluate the scanning methodology using compensating materials. RESULTS: The increase in sensitivity was the highest for OG compared to that for air in the reflective mode. On average, the sensitivity in the reflective mode was higher than that in the transmission mode by a factor of 2.5 for each dose. Among the four compensating materials, OG had the smallest uncertainty. Therefore, the best scan uniformity was achieved when OG was used. CONCLUSIONS: Scanning methodology was proposed in which a compensating material is applied for a curved lens-type dosimeter. Our results show that OG is the most suitable compensating material to obtain the best accuracy of dose analysis. Following this methodology, the scan uncertainty of curved dosimeters significantly decreased. BioMed Central 2022-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9077864/ /pubmed/35526041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02056-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Son, Jaeman
Cho, Jin Dong
Jung, Seongmoon
Choi, Chang Heon
Park, Jong Min
Kim, Jung-in
Scanning methodology for contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeter (CLOD) dosimetry applying a silicone material
title Scanning methodology for contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeter (CLOD) dosimetry applying a silicone material
title_full Scanning methodology for contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeter (CLOD) dosimetry applying a silicone material
title_fullStr Scanning methodology for contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeter (CLOD) dosimetry applying a silicone material
title_full_unstemmed Scanning methodology for contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeter (CLOD) dosimetry applying a silicone material
title_short Scanning methodology for contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeter (CLOD) dosimetry applying a silicone material
title_sort scanning methodology for contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeter (clod) dosimetry applying a silicone material
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35526041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02056-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sonjaeman scanningmethodologyforcontactlenstypeocularinvivodosimetercloddosimetryapplyingasiliconematerial
AT chojindong scanningmethodologyforcontactlenstypeocularinvivodosimetercloddosimetryapplyingasiliconematerial
AT jungseongmoon scanningmethodologyforcontactlenstypeocularinvivodosimetercloddosimetryapplyingasiliconematerial
AT choichangheon scanningmethodologyforcontactlenstypeocularinvivodosimetercloddosimetryapplyingasiliconematerial
AT parkjongmin scanningmethodologyforcontactlenstypeocularinvivodosimetercloddosimetryapplyingasiliconematerial
AT kimjungin scanningmethodologyforcontactlenstypeocularinvivodosimetercloddosimetryapplyingasiliconematerial