Cargando…

Pre-clerkship EPA assessments: a thematic analysis of rater cognition

BACKGROUND: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) assessments measure learners’ competence with an entrustment or supervisory scale. Designed for workplace-based assessment EPA assessments have also been proposed for undergraduate medical education (UME), where assessments frequently occur outs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Eric G., Harvey, Emily, Durning, Steven J., Uijtdehaage, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03402-x
_version_ 1784702211898474496
author Meyer, Eric G.
Harvey, Emily
Durning, Steven J.
Uijtdehaage, Sebastian
author_facet Meyer, Eric G.
Harvey, Emily
Durning, Steven J.
Uijtdehaage, Sebastian
author_sort Meyer, Eric G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) assessments measure learners’ competence with an entrustment or supervisory scale. Designed for workplace-based assessment EPA assessments have also been proposed for undergraduate medical education (UME), where assessments frequently occur outside the workplace and may be less intuitive, raising validity concerns. This study explored how assessors make entrustment determinations in UME, with additional specific comparison based on familiarity with prior performance in the context of longitudinal student-assessor relationships. METHODS: A qualitative approach using think-alouds was employed. Assessors assessed two students (familiar and unfamiliar) completing a history and physical examination using a supervisory scale and then thought-aloud after each assessment. We conducted a thematic analysis of assessors’ response processes and compared them based on their familiarity with a student. RESULTS: Four themes and fifteen subthemes were identified. The most prevalent theme related to “student performance.” The other three themes included “frame of reference,” “assessor uncertainty,” and “the patient.” “Previous student performance” and “affective reactions” were subthemes more likely to inform scoring when faculty were familiar with a student, while unfamiliar faculty were more likely to reference “self” and “lack confidence in their ability to assess.” CONCLUSIONS: Student performance appears to be assessors’ main consideration for all students, providing some validity evidence for the response process in EPA assessments. Several problematic themes could be addressed with faculty development while others appear to be inherent to entrustment and may be more challenging to mitigate. Differences based on assessor familiarity with student merits further research on how trust develops over time. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03402-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9077896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90778962022-05-08 Pre-clerkship EPA assessments: a thematic analysis of rater cognition Meyer, Eric G. Harvey, Emily Durning, Steven J. Uijtdehaage, Sebastian BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) assessments measure learners’ competence with an entrustment or supervisory scale. Designed for workplace-based assessment EPA assessments have also been proposed for undergraduate medical education (UME), where assessments frequently occur outside the workplace and may be less intuitive, raising validity concerns. This study explored how assessors make entrustment determinations in UME, with additional specific comparison based on familiarity with prior performance in the context of longitudinal student-assessor relationships. METHODS: A qualitative approach using think-alouds was employed. Assessors assessed two students (familiar and unfamiliar) completing a history and physical examination using a supervisory scale and then thought-aloud after each assessment. We conducted a thematic analysis of assessors’ response processes and compared them based on their familiarity with a student. RESULTS: Four themes and fifteen subthemes were identified. The most prevalent theme related to “student performance.” The other three themes included “frame of reference,” “assessor uncertainty,” and “the patient.” “Previous student performance” and “affective reactions” were subthemes more likely to inform scoring when faculty were familiar with a student, while unfamiliar faculty were more likely to reference “self” and “lack confidence in their ability to assess.” CONCLUSIONS: Student performance appears to be assessors’ main consideration for all students, providing some validity evidence for the response process in EPA assessments. Several problematic themes could be addressed with faculty development while others appear to be inherent to entrustment and may be more challenging to mitigate. Differences based on assessor familiarity with student merits further research on how trust develops over time. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03402-x. BioMed Central 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9077896/ /pubmed/35524304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03402-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Meyer, Eric G.
Harvey, Emily
Durning, Steven J.
Uijtdehaage, Sebastian
Pre-clerkship EPA assessments: a thematic analysis of rater cognition
title Pre-clerkship EPA assessments: a thematic analysis of rater cognition
title_full Pre-clerkship EPA assessments: a thematic analysis of rater cognition
title_fullStr Pre-clerkship EPA assessments: a thematic analysis of rater cognition
title_full_unstemmed Pre-clerkship EPA assessments: a thematic analysis of rater cognition
title_short Pre-clerkship EPA assessments: a thematic analysis of rater cognition
title_sort pre-clerkship epa assessments: a thematic analysis of rater cognition
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03402-x
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerericg preclerkshipepaassessmentsathematicanalysisofratercognition
AT harveyemily preclerkshipepaassessmentsathematicanalysisofratercognition
AT durningstevenj preclerkshipepaassessmentsathematicanalysisofratercognition
AT uijtdehaagesebastian preclerkshipepaassessmentsathematicanalysisofratercognition