Cargando…
Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Harmonic ACE +7 Shears with Advanced Hemostasis is an upgraded ultrasonic device, an ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES). The study aimed to evaluate the economic and clinical effectiveness of the USES compared with the conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrecto...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9078022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35525958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00344-5 |
_version_ | 1784702238776623104 |
---|---|
author | Jing, Changqing Chen, Yuezhi Shang, Liang Wang, Jinshen Lian, Guodong Tian, Feng Shao, Yixue Zhao, Yingnan Xuan, Jianwei Li, Leping |
author_facet | Jing, Changqing Chen, Yuezhi Shang, Liang Wang, Jinshen Lian, Guodong Tian, Feng Shao, Yixue Zhao, Yingnan Xuan, Jianwei Li, Leping |
author_sort | Jing, Changqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Harmonic ACE +7 Shears with Advanced Hemostasis is an upgraded ultrasonic device, an ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES). The study aimed to evaluate the economic and clinical effectiveness of the USES compared with the conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study using the electronic medical records in China. We collected intraoperative and postoperative data from gastric cancer patients who underwent the endoscope-assisted distal gastrectomy from 2018 to June 30, 2019. Procedure-related costs were estimated. We used linear regression by controlling a set of covariates to assess the effect of USES on outcomes. RESULT: Out of 87 eligible patients, the USES group (40 patients) and CUS group (47 patients) were comparable in terms of age, medical history and stages of cancer. Compared with the CUS, the USES saved 4.27 hemoclips per person (95% CI 0.57–7.97, p < 0.05) and 34.18 ml intraoperative blood per person (95% CI 8.74–59.62 ml, p < 0.05), respectively. Postoperative length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the USES group (7.90 ± 1.95 vs. 9.26 ± 2.81 days) but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The USES group was associated with fewer hemoclips use and intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy at comparable costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-022-00344-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9078022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90780222022-05-08 Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study Jing, Changqing Chen, Yuezhi Shang, Liang Wang, Jinshen Lian, Guodong Tian, Feng Shao, Yixue Zhao, Yingnan Xuan, Jianwei Li, Leping Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Harmonic ACE +7 Shears with Advanced Hemostasis is an upgraded ultrasonic device, an ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES). The study aimed to evaluate the economic and clinical effectiveness of the USES compared with the conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study using the electronic medical records in China. We collected intraoperative and postoperative data from gastric cancer patients who underwent the endoscope-assisted distal gastrectomy from 2018 to June 30, 2019. Procedure-related costs were estimated. We used linear regression by controlling a set of covariates to assess the effect of USES on outcomes. RESULT: Out of 87 eligible patients, the USES group (40 patients) and CUS group (47 patients) were comparable in terms of age, medical history and stages of cancer. Compared with the CUS, the USES saved 4.27 hemoclips per person (95% CI 0.57–7.97, p < 0.05) and 34.18 ml intraoperative blood per person (95% CI 8.74–59.62 ml, p < 0.05), respectively. Postoperative length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the USES group (7.90 ± 1.95 vs. 9.26 ± 2.81 days) but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The USES group was associated with fewer hemoclips use and intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy at comparable costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-022-00344-5. BioMed Central 2022-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9078022/ /pubmed/35525958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00344-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Jing, Changqing Chen, Yuezhi Shang, Liang Wang, Jinshen Lian, Guodong Tian, Feng Shao, Yixue Zhao, Yingnan Xuan, Jianwei Li, Leping Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (uses) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (cus) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9078022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35525958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00344-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jingchangqing ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT chenyuezhi ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT shangliang ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT wangjinshen ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT lianguodong ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT tianfeng ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT shaoyixue ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhaoyingnan ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT xuanjianwei ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT lileping ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy |