Cargando…

Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Harmonic ACE +7 Shears with Advanced Hemostasis is an upgraded ultrasonic device, an ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES). The study aimed to evaluate the economic and clinical effectiveness of the USES compared with the conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrecto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jing, Changqing, Chen, Yuezhi, Shang, Liang, Wang, Jinshen, Lian, Guodong, Tian, Feng, Shao, Yixue, Zhao, Yingnan, Xuan, Jianwei, Li, Leping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9078022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35525958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00344-5
_version_ 1784702238776623104
author Jing, Changqing
Chen, Yuezhi
Shang, Liang
Wang, Jinshen
Lian, Guodong
Tian, Feng
Shao, Yixue
Zhao, Yingnan
Xuan, Jianwei
Li, Leping
author_facet Jing, Changqing
Chen, Yuezhi
Shang, Liang
Wang, Jinshen
Lian, Guodong
Tian, Feng
Shao, Yixue
Zhao, Yingnan
Xuan, Jianwei
Li, Leping
author_sort Jing, Changqing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Harmonic ACE +7 Shears with Advanced Hemostasis is an upgraded ultrasonic device, an ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES). The study aimed to evaluate the economic and clinical effectiveness of the USES compared with the conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study using the electronic medical records in China. We collected intraoperative and postoperative data from gastric cancer patients who underwent the endoscope-assisted distal gastrectomy from 2018 to June 30, 2019. Procedure-related costs were estimated. We used linear regression by controlling a set of covariates to assess the effect of USES on outcomes. RESULT: Out of 87 eligible patients, the USES group (40 patients) and CUS group (47 patients) were comparable in terms of age, medical history and stages of cancer. Compared with the CUS, the USES saved 4.27 hemoclips per person (95% CI 0.57–7.97, p < 0.05) and 34.18 ml intraoperative blood per person (95% CI 8.74–59.62 ml, p < 0.05), respectively. Postoperative length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the USES group (7.90 ± 1.95 vs. 9.26 ± 2.81 days) but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The USES group was associated with fewer hemoclips use and intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy at comparable costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-022-00344-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9078022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90780222022-05-08 Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study Jing, Changqing Chen, Yuezhi Shang, Liang Wang, Jinshen Lian, Guodong Tian, Feng Shao, Yixue Zhao, Yingnan Xuan, Jianwei Li, Leping Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Harmonic ACE +7 Shears with Advanced Hemostasis is an upgraded ultrasonic device, an ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES). The study aimed to evaluate the economic and clinical effectiveness of the USES compared with the conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study using the electronic medical records in China. We collected intraoperative and postoperative data from gastric cancer patients who underwent the endoscope-assisted distal gastrectomy from 2018 to June 30, 2019. Procedure-related costs were estimated. We used linear regression by controlling a set of covariates to assess the effect of USES on outcomes. RESULT: Out of 87 eligible patients, the USES group (40 patients) and CUS group (47 patients) were comparable in terms of age, medical history and stages of cancer. Compared with the CUS, the USES saved 4.27 hemoclips per person (95% CI 0.57–7.97, p < 0.05) and 34.18 ml intraoperative blood per person (95% CI 8.74–59.62 ml, p < 0.05), respectively. Postoperative length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the USES group (7.90 ± 1.95 vs. 9.26 ± 2.81 days) but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The USES group was associated with fewer hemoclips use and intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy at comparable costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-022-00344-5. BioMed Central 2022-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9078022/ /pubmed/35525958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00344-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jing, Changqing
Chen, Yuezhi
Shang, Liang
Wang, Jinshen
Lian, Guodong
Tian, Feng
Shao, Yixue
Zhao, Yingnan
Xuan, Jianwei
Li, Leping
Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study
title Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (USES) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (CUS) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort ultrasonic surgical and electrosurgical system (uses) with conventional ultrasonic scalpel (cus) in gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9078022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35525958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00344-5
work_keys_str_mv AT jingchangqing ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chenyuezhi ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shangliang ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wangjinshen ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lianguodong ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT tianfeng ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shaoyixue ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhaoyingnan ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT xuanjianwei ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lileping ultrasonicsurgicalandelectrosurgicalsystemuseswithconventionalultrasonicscalpelcusingastrectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy