Cargando…

Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice

BACKGROUND: The use of intrathecal drug delivery for chronic and cancer pain medicine has been established for decades. However, optimization and utilization of this technique still lag behind other modalities for pain control. Some of this may be due to variability of surgical technique, medication...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abd-Sayed, Alaa, Fiala, Kenneth, Weisbein, Jacqueline, Chopra, Pooja, Lam, Christopher, Kalia, Hemant, Jassal, Navdeep, Gulati, Amitabh, Sayed, Dawood, Deer, Timothy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9078357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35535265
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S344409
_version_ 1784702313007415296
author Abd-Sayed, Alaa
Fiala, Kenneth
Weisbein, Jacqueline
Chopra, Pooja
Lam, Christopher
Kalia, Hemant
Jassal, Navdeep
Gulati, Amitabh
Sayed, Dawood
Deer, Timothy
author_facet Abd-Sayed, Alaa
Fiala, Kenneth
Weisbein, Jacqueline
Chopra, Pooja
Lam, Christopher
Kalia, Hemant
Jassal, Navdeep
Gulati, Amitabh
Sayed, Dawood
Deer, Timothy
author_sort Abd-Sayed, Alaa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of intrathecal drug delivery for chronic and cancer pain medicine has been established for decades. However, optimization and utilization of this technique still lag behind other modalities for pain control. Some of this may be due to variability of surgical technique, medication usage and education. It is currently unclear on whether or not practitioners follow available algorithms for the use of intrathecal drug delivery systems. METHODS: A survey developed by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) was sent to its members via email using the cloud-based SurveyMonkey. After 30 days of being available, 159 different providers responded to the survey that consisted of 31 various multiple choice and free response questions. Each question was not required and the number of responses to each varied from 128 to 159. RESULTS: Approximately 9% of those who successfully received and opened the email containing the survey responded, likely due to a small number of providers working with intrathecal drug delivery systems. Eighty-six of respondents practice medicine in the United States, and 87% of the respondents were attending physicians. A majority of respondents, approximately 74%, were board certified in pain medicine with 69% of respondents being train in anesthesiology. The first and second most used medications for intrathecal pump trial were morphine and fentanyl, respectively. Most respondents, approximately 96%, provide pre-operative/intra-operative antibiotics. The most common first-choice medication for implanted intrathecal pumps was also morphine with the most common implanted location being the abdomen. CONCLUSION: Interestingly, there is currently fairly substantial variation in the way providers utilize intrathecal pump delivery for both chronic and cancer pain. There is variation from the training background of the providers providing care, to the pre-implantation trial medications, to where the pump is implanted for each patient, to if the patient has the option to give themselves boluses once implanted. Further research is needed to elucidate current and best practices for intrathecal drug delivery system trials, implantations, and utilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9078357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90783572022-05-08 Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice Abd-Sayed, Alaa Fiala, Kenneth Weisbein, Jacqueline Chopra, Pooja Lam, Christopher Kalia, Hemant Jassal, Navdeep Gulati, Amitabh Sayed, Dawood Deer, Timothy J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The use of intrathecal drug delivery for chronic and cancer pain medicine has been established for decades. However, optimization and utilization of this technique still lag behind other modalities for pain control. Some of this may be due to variability of surgical technique, medication usage and education. It is currently unclear on whether or not practitioners follow available algorithms for the use of intrathecal drug delivery systems. METHODS: A survey developed by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) was sent to its members via email using the cloud-based SurveyMonkey. After 30 days of being available, 159 different providers responded to the survey that consisted of 31 various multiple choice and free response questions. Each question was not required and the number of responses to each varied from 128 to 159. RESULTS: Approximately 9% of those who successfully received and opened the email containing the survey responded, likely due to a small number of providers working with intrathecal drug delivery systems. Eighty-six of respondents practice medicine in the United States, and 87% of the respondents were attending physicians. A majority of respondents, approximately 74%, were board certified in pain medicine with 69% of respondents being train in anesthesiology. The first and second most used medications for intrathecal pump trial were morphine and fentanyl, respectively. Most respondents, approximately 96%, provide pre-operative/intra-operative antibiotics. The most common first-choice medication for implanted intrathecal pumps was also morphine with the most common implanted location being the abdomen. CONCLUSION: Interestingly, there is currently fairly substantial variation in the way providers utilize intrathecal pump delivery for both chronic and cancer pain. There is variation from the training background of the providers providing care, to the pre-implantation trial medications, to where the pump is implanted for each patient, to if the patient has the option to give themselves boluses once implanted. Further research is needed to elucidate current and best practices for intrathecal drug delivery system trials, implantations, and utilization. Dove 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9078357/ /pubmed/35535265 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S344409 Text en © 2022 Abd-Sayed et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Abd-Sayed, Alaa
Fiala, Kenneth
Weisbein, Jacqueline
Chopra, Pooja
Lam, Christopher
Kalia, Hemant
Jassal, Navdeep
Gulati, Amitabh
Sayed, Dawood
Deer, Timothy
Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice
title Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice
title_full Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice
title_fullStr Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice
title_full_unstemmed Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice
title_short Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice
title_sort intrathecal drug delivery systems survey: trends in utilization in pain practice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9078357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35535265
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S344409
work_keys_str_mv AT abdsayedalaa intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice
AT fialakenneth intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice
AT weisbeinjacqueline intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice
AT choprapooja intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice
AT lamchristopher intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice
AT kaliahemant intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice
AT jassalnavdeep intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice
AT gulatiamitabh intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice
AT sayeddawood intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice
AT deertimothy intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice