Cargando…
Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice
BACKGROUND: The use of intrathecal drug delivery for chronic and cancer pain medicine has been established for decades. However, optimization and utilization of this technique still lag behind other modalities for pain control. Some of this may be due to variability of surgical technique, medication...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9078357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35535265 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S344409 |
_version_ | 1784702313007415296 |
---|---|
author | Abd-Sayed, Alaa Fiala, Kenneth Weisbein, Jacqueline Chopra, Pooja Lam, Christopher Kalia, Hemant Jassal, Navdeep Gulati, Amitabh Sayed, Dawood Deer, Timothy |
author_facet | Abd-Sayed, Alaa Fiala, Kenneth Weisbein, Jacqueline Chopra, Pooja Lam, Christopher Kalia, Hemant Jassal, Navdeep Gulati, Amitabh Sayed, Dawood Deer, Timothy |
author_sort | Abd-Sayed, Alaa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of intrathecal drug delivery for chronic and cancer pain medicine has been established for decades. However, optimization and utilization of this technique still lag behind other modalities for pain control. Some of this may be due to variability of surgical technique, medication usage and education. It is currently unclear on whether or not practitioners follow available algorithms for the use of intrathecal drug delivery systems. METHODS: A survey developed by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) was sent to its members via email using the cloud-based SurveyMonkey. After 30 days of being available, 159 different providers responded to the survey that consisted of 31 various multiple choice and free response questions. Each question was not required and the number of responses to each varied from 128 to 159. RESULTS: Approximately 9% of those who successfully received and opened the email containing the survey responded, likely due to a small number of providers working with intrathecal drug delivery systems. Eighty-six of respondents practice medicine in the United States, and 87% of the respondents were attending physicians. A majority of respondents, approximately 74%, were board certified in pain medicine with 69% of respondents being train in anesthesiology. The first and second most used medications for intrathecal pump trial were morphine and fentanyl, respectively. Most respondents, approximately 96%, provide pre-operative/intra-operative antibiotics. The most common first-choice medication for implanted intrathecal pumps was also morphine with the most common implanted location being the abdomen. CONCLUSION: Interestingly, there is currently fairly substantial variation in the way providers utilize intrathecal pump delivery for both chronic and cancer pain. There is variation from the training background of the providers providing care, to the pre-implantation trial medications, to where the pump is implanted for each patient, to if the patient has the option to give themselves boluses once implanted. Further research is needed to elucidate current and best practices for intrathecal drug delivery system trials, implantations, and utilization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9078357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90783572022-05-08 Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice Abd-Sayed, Alaa Fiala, Kenneth Weisbein, Jacqueline Chopra, Pooja Lam, Christopher Kalia, Hemant Jassal, Navdeep Gulati, Amitabh Sayed, Dawood Deer, Timothy J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The use of intrathecal drug delivery for chronic and cancer pain medicine has been established for decades. However, optimization and utilization of this technique still lag behind other modalities for pain control. Some of this may be due to variability of surgical technique, medication usage and education. It is currently unclear on whether or not practitioners follow available algorithms for the use of intrathecal drug delivery systems. METHODS: A survey developed by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) was sent to its members via email using the cloud-based SurveyMonkey. After 30 days of being available, 159 different providers responded to the survey that consisted of 31 various multiple choice and free response questions. Each question was not required and the number of responses to each varied from 128 to 159. RESULTS: Approximately 9% of those who successfully received and opened the email containing the survey responded, likely due to a small number of providers working with intrathecal drug delivery systems. Eighty-six of respondents practice medicine in the United States, and 87% of the respondents were attending physicians. A majority of respondents, approximately 74%, were board certified in pain medicine with 69% of respondents being train in anesthesiology. The first and second most used medications for intrathecal pump trial were morphine and fentanyl, respectively. Most respondents, approximately 96%, provide pre-operative/intra-operative antibiotics. The most common first-choice medication for implanted intrathecal pumps was also morphine with the most common implanted location being the abdomen. CONCLUSION: Interestingly, there is currently fairly substantial variation in the way providers utilize intrathecal pump delivery for both chronic and cancer pain. There is variation from the training background of the providers providing care, to the pre-implantation trial medications, to where the pump is implanted for each patient, to if the patient has the option to give themselves boluses once implanted. Further research is needed to elucidate current and best practices for intrathecal drug delivery system trials, implantations, and utilization. Dove 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9078357/ /pubmed/35535265 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S344409 Text en © 2022 Abd-Sayed et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Abd-Sayed, Alaa Fiala, Kenneth Weisbein, Jacqueline Chopra, Pooja Lam, Christopher Kalia, Hemant Jassal, Navdeep Gulati, Amitabh Sayed, Dawood Deer, Timothy Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice |
title | Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice |
title_full | Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice |
title_fullStr | Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice |
title_short | Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice |
title_sort | intrathecal drug delivery systems survey: trends in utilization in pain practice |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9078357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35535265 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S344409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdsayedalaa intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice AT fialakenneth intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice AT weisbeinjacqueline intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice AT choprapooja intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice AT lamchristopher intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice AT kaliahemant intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice AT jassalnavdeep intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice AT gulatiamitabh intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice AT sayeddawood intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice AT deertimothy intrathecaldrugdeliverysystemssurveytrendsinutilizationinpainpractice |