Cargando…

Difference in the deactivation of Au catalysts during ethanol transformation when supported on ZnO and on TiO(2)

Au nanoparticles of different sizes were supported by the deposition–precipitation method on two metal oxides: ZnO and TiO(2). The resulting catalysts were tested in the ethanol catalytic transformation reaction. Both metal oxide support materials exerted a different influence on the achieved Au par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales, M. V., Asedegbega-Nieto, E., Castillejos-López, E., Bachiller-Baeza, B., Guerrero-Ruiz, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9078420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35539147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra00314a
_version_ 1784702327478812672
author Morales, M. V.
Asedegbega-Nieto, E.
Castillejos-López, E.
Bachiller-Baeza, B.
Guerrero-Ruiz, A.
author_facet Morales, M. V.
Asedegbega-Nieto, E.
Castillejos-López, E.
Bachiller-Baeza, B.
Guerrero-Ruiz, A.
author_sort Morales, M. V.
collection PubMed
description Au nanoparticles of different sizes were supported by the deposition–precipitation method on two metal oxides: ZnO and TiO(2). The resulting catalysts were tested in the ethanol catalytic transformation reaction. Both metal oxide support materials exerted a different influence on the achieved Au particle size as well as on the behavior of the subsequent catalyst, with regard to their initial conversion values, product distribution and stability. While TiO(2) favors the formation of smaller nanoparticles, ZnO offers larger Au particle sizes when prepared under similar conditions. At the same time, TiO(2) produced catalysts which displayed higher initial conversions in comparison with AuZnO catalysts, even when observing catalysts of each series with similar particle sizes. At the same time, catalysts supported on ZnO exhibited higher resistance to deactivation caused by coke formation. These results were evidenced employing different characterization techniques on both used and fresh catalyst samples. The decline in deactivation was generally accompanied by an increase in the carbon content on the catalyst's surface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9078420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90784202022-05-09 Difference in the deactivation of Au catalysts during ethanol transformation when supported on ZnO and on TiO(2) Morales, M. V. Asedegbega-Nieto, E. Castillejos-López, E. Bachiller-Baeza, B. Guerrero-Ruiz, A. RSC Adv Chemistry Au nanoparticles of different sizes were supported by the deposition–precipitation method on two metal oxides: ZnO and TiO(2). The resulting catalysts were tested in the ethanol catalytic transformation reaction. Both metal oxide support materials exerted a different influence on the achieved Au particle size as well as on the behavior of the subsequent catalyst, with regard to their initial conversion values, product distribution and stability. While TiO(2) favors the formation of smaller nanoparticles, ZnO offers larger Au particle sizes when prepared under similar conditions. At the same time, TiO(2) produced catalysts which displayed higher initial conversions in comparison with AuZnO catalysts, even when observing catalysts of each series with similar particle sizes. At the same time, catalysts supported on ZnO exhibited higher resistance to deactivation caused by coke formation. These results were evidenced employing different characterization techniques on both used and fresh catalyst samples. The decline in deactivation was generally accompanied by an increase in the carbon content on the catalyst's surface. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9078420/ /pubmed/35539147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra00314a Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Morales, M. V.
Asedegbega-Nieto, E.
Castillejos-López, E.
Bachiller-Baeza, B.
Guerrero-Ruiz, A.
Difference in the deactivation of Au catalysts during ethanol transformation when supported on ZnO and on TiO(2)
title Difference in the deactivation of Au catalysts during ethanol transformation when supported on ZnO and on TiO(2)
title_full Difference in the deactivation of Au catalysts during ethanol transformation when supported on ZnO and on TiO(2)
title_fullStr Difference in the deactivation of Au catalysts during ethanol transformation when supported on ZnO and on TiO(2)
title_full_unstemmed Difference in the deactivation of Au catalysts during ethanol transformation when supported on ZnO and on TiO(2)
title_short Difference in the deactivation of Au catalysts during ethanol transformation when supported on ZnO and on TiO(2)
title_sort difference in the deactivation of au catalysts during ethanol transformation when supported on zno and on tio(2)
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9078420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35539147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra00314a
work_keys_str_mv AT moralesmv differenceinthedeactivationofaucatalystsduringethanoltransformationwhensupportedonznoandontio2
AT asedegbeganietoe differenceinthedeactivationofaucatalystsduringethanoltransformationwhensupportedonznoandontio2
AT castillejoslopeze differenceinthedeactivationofaucatalystsduringethanoltransformationwhensupportedonznoandontio2
AT bachillerbaezab differenceinthedeactivationofaucatalystsduringethanoltransformationwhensupportedonznoandontio2
AT guerreroruiza differenceinthedeactivationofaucatalystsduringethanoltransformationwhensupportedonznoandontio2