Cargando…

Coherency image analysis to quantify collagen architecture: implications in scar assessment

An important histological difference between normal, uninjured dermis and scar tissue such as that found in keloid scars is the pattern (morphological architecture) in which the collagen is deposited and arranged. In the uninjured dermis, collagen bundle architecture appears randomly organized (or i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clemons, T. D., Bradshaw, M., Toshniwal, P., Chaudhari, N., Stevenson, A. W., Lynch, J., Fear, M. W., Wood, F. M., Iyer, K. Swaminathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9078703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35540841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7ra12693j
_version_ 1784702394286735360
author Clemons, T. D.
Bradshaw, M.
Toshniwal, P.
Chaudhari, N.
Stevenson, A. W.
Lynch, J.
Fear, M. W.
Wood, F. M.
Iyer, K. Swaminathan
author_facet Clemons, T. D.
Bradshaw, M.
Toshniwal, P.
Chaudhari, N.
Stevenson, A. W.
Lynch, J.
Fear, M. W.
Wood, F. M.
Iyer, K. Swaminathan
author_sort Clemons, T. D.
collection PubMed
description An important histological difference between normal, uninjured dermis and scar tissue such as that found in keloid scars is the pattern (morphological architecture) in which the collagen is deposited and arranged. In the uninjured dermis, collagen bundle architecture appears randomly organized (or in a basket weave formation), whereas in pathological conditions such as keloid scar tissue, collagen bundles are often found in whorls or in a hypotrophic scar collagen is more densely packed in a parallel configuration. In the case of skin, a scar disables the dermis, leaving it weaker, stiff and with a loss of optimal functionality. The absence of objective and quantifiable assessments of collagen orientation is a major bottleneck in monitoring progression of scar therapeutics. In this article, a novel quantitative approach for analyzing collagen orientation is reported. The methodology is demonstrated using collagen produced by cells in a model scar environment and examines collagen remodeling post-TGFβ stimulation in vitro. The method is shown to be reliable and effective in identifying significant coherency differences in the collagen deposited by human keloid scar cells. The technique is also compared for analysing collagen architecture in rat sections of normal, scarred skin and tendon tissue. Results demonstrate that the proposed computational method provides a fast and robust way of analyzing collagen orientation in a manner surpassing existing methods. This study establishes this methodology as a preliminary means of monitoring in vitro and in tissue treatment modalities which are expected to alter collagen morphology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9078703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90787032022-05-09 Coherency image analysis to quantify collagen architecture: implications in scar assessment Clemons, T. D. Bradshaw, M. Toshniwal, P. Chaudhari, N. Stevenson, A. W. Lynch, J. Fear, M. W. Wood, F. M. Iyer, K. Swaminathan RSC Adv Chemistry An important histological difference between normal, uninjured dermis and scar tissue such as that found in keloid scars is the pattern (morphological architecture) in which the collagen is deposited and arranged. In the uninjured dermis, collagen bundle architecture appears randomly organized (or in a basket weave formation), whereas in pathological conditions such as keloid scar tissue, collagen bundles are often found in whorls or in a hypotrophic scar collagen is more densely packed in a parallel configuration. In the case of skin, a scar disables the dermis, leaving it weaker, stiff and with a loss of optimal functionality. The absence of objective and quantifiable assessments of collagen orientation is a major bottleneck in monitoring progression of scar therapeutics. In this article, a novel quantitative approach for analyzing collagen orientation is reported. The methodology is demonstrated using collagen produced by cells in a model scar environment and examines collagen remodeling post-TGFβ stimulation in vitro. The method is shown to be reliable and effective in identifying significant coherency differences in the collagen deposited by human keloid scar cells. The technique is also compared for analysing collagen architecture in rat sections of normal, scarred skin and tendon tissue. Results demonstrate that the proposed computational method provides a fast and robust way of analyzing collagen orientation in a manner surpassing existing methods. This study establishes this methodology as a preliminary means of monitoring in vitro and in tissue treatment modalities which are expected to alter collagen morphology. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9078703/ /pubmed/35540841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7ra12693j Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Clemons, T. D.
Bradshaw, M.
Toshniwal, P.
Chaudhari, N.
Stevenson, A. W.
Lynch, J.
Fear, M. W.
Wood, F. M.
Iyer, K. Swaminathan
Coherency image analysis to quantify collagen architecture: implications in scar assessment
title Coherency image analysis to quantify collagen architecture: implications in scar assessment
title_full Coherency image analysis to quantify collagen architecture: implications in scar assessment
title_fullStr Coherency image analysis to quantify collagen architecture: implications in scar assessment
title_full_unstemmed Coherency image analysis to quantify collagen architecture: implications in scar assessment
title_short Coherency image analysis to quantify collagen architecture: implications in scar assessment
title_sort coherency image analysis to quantify collagen architecture: implications in scar assessment
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9078703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35540841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7ra12693j
work_keys_str_mv AT clemonstd coherencyimageanalysistoquantifycollagenarchitectureimplicationsinscarassessment
AT bradshawm coherencyimageanalysistoquantifycollagenarchitectureimplicationsinscarassessment
AT toshniwalp coherencyimageanalysistoquantifycollagenarchitectureimplicationsinscarassessment
AT chaudharin coherencyimageanalysistoquantifycollagenarchitectureimplicationsinscarassessment
AT stevensonaw coherencyimageanalysistoquantifycollagenarchitectureimplicationsinscarassessment
AT lynchj coherencyimageanalysistoquantifycollagenarchitectureimplicationsinscarassessment
AT fearmw coherencyimageanalysistoquantifycollagenarchitectureimplicationsinscarassessment
AT woodfm coherencyimageanalysistoquantifycollagenarchitectureimplicationsinscarassessment
AT iyerkswaminathan coherencyimageanalysistoquantifycollagenarchitectureimplicationsinscarassessment