Cargando…

Trust Versus Content in Multi-functional Land Management: Assessing Soil Function Messaging in Agricultural Networks

Growing sustainability demands on land have a high knowledge requirement across multiple scientific domains. Exploring networks can expose opportunities for targeting. Using mixed-methods combining social network analysis (SNA) and surveys, networks for key soil functions in case studies in Germany,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Sullivan, Lilian, Leeuwis, Cees, de Vries, Linde, Wall, David P., Heidkroß, Talke, Madena, Kirsten, Schulte, Rogier P. O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9079025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01647-2
_version_ 1784702469910036480
author O’Sullivan, Lilian
Leeuwis, Cees
de Vries, Linde
Wall, David P.
Heidkroß, Talke
Madena, Kirsten
Schulte, Rogier P. O.
author_facet O’Sullivan, Lilian
Leeuwis, Cees
de Vries, Linde
Wall, David P.
Heidkroß, Talke
Madena, Kirsten
Schulte, Rogier P. O.
author_sort O’Sullivan, Lilian
collection PubMed
description Growing sustainability demands on land have a high knowledge requirement across multiple scientific domains. Exploring networks can expose opportunities for targeting. Using mixed-methods combining social network analysis (SNA) and surveys, networks for key soil functions in case studies in Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands are explored. We find a diversity of contrasting networks that reflect local conditions, sustainability challenges and governance structure. Farmers were found to occupy a central role in the agri-environmental governance network. A comparison of the SNA and survey results indicate low acceptance of messages from many central actors indicating scope to better harness the network for sustainable land management. The source of the messages was important when it came to the implementation of farm management actions. Two pathways for enhanced farmer uptake of multi-functionality are proposed that have wider application are; to increase trust between farmers and actors that are agents of multi-functional messages and/or to increase the bundling or multi-functionality of messages (mandate) of actors trusted by farmers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9079025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90790252022-05-09 Trust Versus Content in Multi-functional Land Management: Assessing Soil Function Messaging in Agricultural Networks O’Sullivan, Lilian Leeuwis, Cees de Vries, Linde Wall, David P. Heidkroß, Talke Madena, Kirsten Schulte, Rogier P. O. Environ Manage Article Growing sustainability demands on land have a high knowledge requirement across multiple scientific domains. Exploring networks can expose opportunities for targeting. Using mixed-methods combining social network analysis (SNA) and surveys, networks for key soil functions in case studies in Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands are explored. We find a diversity of contrasting networks that reflect local conditions, sustainability challenges and governance structure. Farmers were found to occupy a central role in the agri-environmental governance network. A comparison of the SNA and survey results indicate low acceptance of messages from many central actors indicating scope to better harness the network for sustainable land management. The source of the messages was important when it came to the implementation of farm management actions. Two pathways for enhanced farmer uptake of multi-functionality are proposed that have wider application are; to increase trust between farmers and actors that are agents of multi-functional messages and/or to increase the bundling or multi-functionality of messages (mandate) of actors trusted by farmers. Springer US 2022-04-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9079025/ /pubmed/35451645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01647-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
O’Sullivan, Lilian
Leeuwis, Cees
de Vries, Linde
Wall, David P.
Heidkroß, Talke
Madena, Kirsten
Schulte, Rogier P. O.
Trust Versus Content in Multi-functional Land Management: Assessing Soil Function Messaging in Agricultural Networks
title Trust Versus Content in Multi-functional Land Management: Assessing Soil Function Messaging in Agricultural Networks
title_full Trust Versus Content in Multi-functional Land Management: Assessing Soil Function Messaging in Agricultural Networks
title_fullStr Trust Versus Content in Multi-functional Land Management: Assessing Soil Function Messaging in Agricultural Networks
title_full_unstemmed Trust Versus Content in Multi-functional Land Management: Assessing Soil Function Messaging in Agricultural Networks
title_short Trust Versus Content in Multi-functional Land Management: Assessing Soil Function Messaging in Agricultural Networks
title_sort trust versus content in multi-functional land management: assessing soil function messaging in agricultural networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9079025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01647-2
work_keys_str_mv AT osullivanlilian trustversuscontentinmultifunctionallandmanagementassessingsoilfunctionmessaginginagriculturalnetworks
AT leeuwiscees trustversuscontentinmultifunctionallandmanagementassessingsoilfunctionmessaginginagriculturalnetworks
AT devrieslinde trustversuscontentinmultifunctionallandmanagementassessingsoilfunctionmessaginginagriculturalnetworks
AT walldavidp trustversuscontentinmultifunctionallandmanagementassessingsoilfunctionmessaginginagriculturalnetworks
AT heidkroßtalke trustversuscontentinmultifunctionallandmanagementassessingsoilfunctionmessaginginagriculturalnetworks
AT madenakirsten trustversuscontentinmultifunctionallandmanagementassessingsoilfunctionmessaginginagriculturalnetworks
AT schulterogierpo trustversuscontentinmultifunctionallandmanagementassessingsoilfunctionmessaginginagriculturalnetworks