Cargando…

Understanding differences in Er(3+)–Yb(3+) codoped glass and glass ceramic based on upconversion luminescence for optical thermometry

Optical thermometry has attracted growing consideration due to its outstanding performance. In this research, precursor glass with compositions of 50SiO(2)–20Al(2)O(3)–30CaF(2)–0.5ErF(3)–1YbF(3) and the corresponding CaF(2) glass ceramic were prepared for optical temperature sensing comparison. A la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Yingxin, Lv, Shichao, Ma, Zhijun, Qiu, Jianrong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9079277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35539388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra01245h
_version_ 1784702527872172032
author Hao, Yingxin
Lv, Shichao
Ma, Zhijun
Qiu, Jianrong
author_facet Hao, Yingxin
Lv, Shichao
Ma, Zhijun
Qiu, Jianrong
author_sort Hao, Yingxin
collection PubMed
description Optical thermometry has attracted growing consideration due to its outstanding performance. In this research, precursor glass with compositions of 50SiO(2)–20Al(2)O(3)–30CaF(2)–0.5ErF(3)–1YbF(3) and the corresponding CaF(2) glass ceramic were prepared for optical temperature sensing comparison. A large enhancement in upconversion luminescence originated from thermally coupled energy levels ((2)H(11/2) and (4)S(3/2)) and (4)F(9/2) was confirmed in the transparent glass ceramic (GC). Importantly, the temperature-dependent upconversion fluorescence intensity ratios of glass and GC were investigated from 303 K to 573 K under a 980 nm laser with constant pumping power. It was found that GC shows weaker optical thermometry ability than the precursor glass in terms of temperature sensitivity, the maximum relative sensitivity of GC reached to 10.6 × 10(−3) K(−1) at 303 K while that of the glass is 11.15 × 10(−3) K(−1) at 303 K, the thermally coupled energy gap reduced about 34.2 cm(−1) after crystallization, we attribute this change to the crystal field effect. Furthermore, the FIR value variation of glass shows weaker pumping power dependence than GC in terms of thermal effect induced by laser. The temperature-cycle measurements suggest that both glass and GC exhibit favorable thermal stability. Consequently, our results may contribute to enriching our understanding of the optical temperature sensing properties of glass and glass ceramic in other systems and provide a comprehensive perspective to design practical optical thermometry materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9079277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90792772022-05-09 Understanding differences in Er(3+)–Yb(3+) codoped glass and glass ceramic based on upconversion luminescence for optical thermometry Hao, Yingxin Lv, Shichao Ma, Zhijun Qiu, Jianrong RSC Adv Chemistry Optical thermometry has attracted growing consideration due to its outstanding performance. In this research, precursor glass with compositions of 50SiO(2)–20Al(2)O(3)–30CaF(2)–0.5ErF(3)–1YbF(3) and the corresponding CaF(2) glass ceramic were prepared for optical temperature sensing comparison. A large enhancement in upconversion luminescence originated from thermally coupled energy levels ((2)H(11/2) and (4)S(3/2)) and (4)F(9/2) was confirmed in the transparent glass ceramic (GC). Importantly, the temperature-dependent upconversion fluorescence intensity ratios of glass and GC were investigated from 303 K to 573 K under a 980 nm laser with constant pumping power. It was found that GC shows weaker optical thermometry ability than the precursor glass in terms of temperature sensitivity, the maximum relative sensitivity of GC reached to 10.6 × 10(−3) K(−1) at 303 K while that of the glass is 11.15 × 10(−3) K(−1) at 303 K, the thermally coupled energy gap reduced about 34.2 cm(−1) after crystallization, we attribute this change to the crystal field effect. Furthermore, the FIR value variation of glass shows weaker pumping power dependence than GC in terms of thermal effect induced by laser. The temperature-cycle measurements suggest that both glass and GC exhibit favorable thermal stability. Consequently, our results may contribute to enriching our understanding of the optical temperature sensing properties of glass and glass ceramic in other systems and provide a comprehensive perspective to design practical optical thermometry materials. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9079277/ /pubmed/35539388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra01245h Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Hao, Yingxin
Lv, Shichao
Ma, Zhijun
Qiu, Jianrong
Understanding differences in Er(3+)–Yb(3+) codoped glass and glass ceramic based on upconversion luminescence for optical thermometry
title Understanding differences in Er(3+)–Yb(3+) codoped glass and glass ceramic based on upconversion luminescence for optical thermometry
title_full Understanding differences in Er(3+)–Yb(3+) codoped glass and glass ceramic based on upconversion luminescence for optical thermometry
title_fullStr Understanding differences in Er(3+)–Yb(3+) codoped glass and glass ceramic based on upconversion luminescence for optical thermometry
title_full_unstemmed Understanding differences in Er(3+)–Yb(3+) codoped glass and glass ceramic based on upconversion luminescence for optical thermometry
title_short Understanding differences in Er(3+)–Yb(3+) codoped glass and glass ceramic based on upconversion luminescence for optical thermometry
title_sort understanding differences in er(3+)–yb(3+) codoped glass and glass ceramic based on upconversion luminescence for optical thermometry
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9079277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35539388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra01245h
work_keys_str_mv AT haoyingxin understandingdifferencesiner3yb3codopedglassandglassceramicbasedonupconversionluminescenceforopticalthermometry
AT lvshichao understandingdifferencesiner3yb3codopedglassandglassceramicbasedonupconversionluminescenceforopticalthermometry
AT mazhijun understandingdifferencesiner3yb3codopedglassandglassceramicbasedonupconversionluminescenceforopticalthermometry
AT qiujianrong understandingdifferencesiner3yb3codopedglassandglassceramicbasedonupconversionluminescenceforopticalthermometry