Cargando…

β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: There is conflicting evidence regarding the type of β-blockers to use in dialysis patients. This systematic review seeks to determine whether highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis patients than...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tella, Abhinav, Vang, William, Ikeri, Eustacia, Taylor, Olivia, Zhang, Alicia, Mazanec, Megan, Raju, Srihari, Ishani, Areef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9079357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35539430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100460
_version_ 1784702546659508224
author Tella, Abhinav
Vang, William
Ikeri, Eustacia
Taylor, Olivia
Zhang, Alicia
Mazanec, Megan
Raju, Srihari
Ishani, Areef
author_facet Tella, Abhinav
Vang, William
Ikeri, Eustacia
Taylor, Olivia
Zhang, Alicia
Mazanec, Megan
Raju, Srihari
Ishani, Areef
author_sort Tella, Abhinav
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: There is conflicting evidence regarding the type of β-blockers to use in dialysis patients. This systematic review seeks to determine whether highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis patients than poorly dialyzable β-blockers. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of the existing literature was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed using data from the selected studies. SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS: Participants were from the United States, Canada, and Taiwan. The mean ages of participants ranged from 55.9-75.7 years. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: We searched the Ovid MEDLINE database from 1990 to September 2020. Studies without adult hemodialysis participants and without comparisons of at least 2 β-blockers of different dialyzability were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Baseline and adjusted outcome data were extracted from each study. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios using fully adjusted models from individual studies. RESULTS: Four cohort studies were included. Pooling fully adjusted models, highly dialyzable β-blockers did not influence mortality (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.08; I(2) = 0.84) compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers but were associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I(2) = 0.35). Only 1 study reported on adverse events. Intradialytic hypotension was more common in those on carvedilol (a poorly dialyzable β-blocker) compared with those on metoprolol (a highly dialyzable β-blocker; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11). LIMITATIONS: No randomized controlled trials were identified. Each study used different analytic methods and different definitions for outcomes. Classifications of β-blockers varied. Only 1 study reported on adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled data suggest highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with similar mortality events and fewer cardiovascular events compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9079357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90793572022-05-09 β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review Tella, Abhinav Vang, William Ikeri, Eustacia Taylor, Olivia Zhang, Alicia Mazanec, Megan Raju, Srihari Ishani, Areef Kidney Med Original Research RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: There is conflicting evidence regarding the type of β-blockers to use in dialysis patients. This systematic review seeks to determine whether highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis patients than poorly dialyzable β-blockers. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of the existing literature was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed using data from the selected studies. SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS: Participants were from the United States, Canada, and Taiwan. The mean ages of participants ranged from 55.9-75.7 years. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: We searched the Ovid MEDLINE database from 1990 to September 2020. Studies without adult hemodialysis participants and without comparisons of at least 2 β-blockers of different dialyzability were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Baseline and adjusted outcome data were extracted from each study. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios using fully adjusted models from individual studies. RESULTS: Four cohort studies were included. Pooling fully adjusted models, highly dialyzable β-blockers did not influence mortality (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.08; I(2) = 0.84) compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers but were associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I(2) = 0.35). Only 1 study reported on adverse events. Intradialytic hypotension was more common in those on carvedilol (a poorly dialyzable β-blocker) compared with those on metoprolol (a highly dialyzable β-blocker; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11). LIMITATIONS: No randomized controlled trials were identified. Each study used different analytic methods and different definitions for outcomes. Classifications of β-blockers varied. Only 1 study reported on adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled data suggest highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with similar mortality events and fewer cardiovascular events compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers. Elsevier 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9079357/ /pubmed/35539430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100460 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Tella, Abhinav
Vang, William
Ikeri, Eustacia
Taylor, Olivia
Zhang, Alicia
Mazanec, Megan
Raju, Srihari
Ishani, Areef
β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review
title β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review
title_full β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review
title_short β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review
title_sort β-blocker use and cardiovascular outcomes in hemodialysis: a systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9079357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35539430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100460
work_keys_str_mv AT tellaabhinav bblockeruseandcardiovascularoutcomesinhemodialysisasystematicreview
AT vangwilliam bblockeruseandcardiovascularoutcomesinhemodialysisasystematicreview
AT ikerieustacia bblockeruseandcardiovascularoutcomesinhemodialysisasystematicreview
AT taylorolivia bblockeruseandcardiovascularoutcomesinhemodialysisasystematicreview
AT zhangalicia bblockeruseandcardiovascularoutcomesinhemodialysisasystematicreview
AT mazanecmegan bblockeruseandcardiovascularoutcomesinhemodialysisasystematicreview
AT rajusrihari bblockeruseandcardiovascularoutcomesinhemodialysisasystematicreview
AT ishaniareef bblockeruseandcardiovascularoutcomesinhemodialysisasystematicreview