Cargando…
The potential of new prediction models for emergency medical dispatch prioritisation of patients with chest pain: a cohort study
OBJECTIVES: To develop emergency medical dispatch (EMD) centre prediction models with high sensitivity and satisfying specificity to identify high-priority patients and patients suitable for non-emergency care respectively, when assessing patients with chest pain. METHODS: Observational cohort study...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9080130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35527302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01021-5 |
_version_ | 1784702715400552448 |
---|---|
author | Wibring, Kristoffer Lingman, Markus Herlitz, Johan Bång, Angela |
author_facet | Wibring, Kristoffer Lingman, Markus Herlitz, Johan Bång, Angela |
author_sort | Wibring, Kristoffer |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To develop emergency medical dispatch (EMD) centre prediction models with high sensitivity and satisfying specificity to identify high-priority patients and patients suitable for non-emergency care respectively, when assessing patients with chest pain. METHODS: Observational cohort study of 2917 unselected patients with chest pain who contacted an EMD centre in Sweden due to chest pain during 2018. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to develop models predicting low-risk or high-risk condition, that is, occurrence of time-sensitive diagnosis on hospital discharge. RESULTS: Prediction models were developed for the identification of patients suitable for high- and low-priority dispatch, using 11 and 10 variables respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the high-risk prediction model was 0.79 and for the low-risk model it was 0.74. When applying the high-risk prediction model, 56% of the EMS missions were given highest priority, compared with 65% with the current standard. When applying the low-risk model, 7% were given the lowest priority compared to 1% for the current standard. The new prediction models outperformed today’s dispatch priority accuracy in terms of sensitivity as well as positive and negative predictive value in both high- and low-risk prediction. The low-risk model predicted almost six times as many patients as having low-risk conditions compared with today’s standard. This was done without increasing the number of high-risk patients wrongly assessed as low-risk. CONCLUSIONS: By introducing prediction models, based on logistic regression analyses, using variables obtained by standard EMD-questions on age, sex, medical history and symptomology, EMD prioritisation can be improved compared with using current criteria index-based ones. This will allow a more efficient emergency medical services resource allocation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9080130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90801302022-05-09 The potential of new prediction models for emergency medical dispatch prioritisation of patients with chest pain: a cohort study Wibring, Kristoffer Lingman, Markus Herlitz, Johan Bång, Angela Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: To develop emergency medical dispatch (EMD) centre prediction models with high sensitivity and satisfying specificity to identify high-priority patients and patients suitable for non-emergency care respectively, when assessing patients with chest pain. METHODS: Observational cohort study of 2917 unselected patients with chest pain who contacted an EMD centre in Sweden due to chest pain during 2018. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to develop models predicting low-risk or high-risk condition, that is, occurrence of time-sensitive diagnosis on hospital discharge. RESULTS: Prediction models were developed for the identification of patients suitable for high- and low-priority dispatch, using 11 and 10 variables respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the high-risk prediction model was 0.79 and for the low-risk model it was 0.74. When applying the high-risk prediction model, 56% of the EMS missions were given highest priority, compared with 65% with the current standard. When applying the low-risk model, 7% were given the lowest priority compared to 1% for the current standard. The new prediction models outperformed today’s dispatch priority accuracy in terms of sensitivity as well as positive and negative predictive value in both high- and low-risk prediction. The low-risk model predicted almost six times as many patients as having low-risk conditions compared with today’s standard. This was done without increasing the number of high-risk patients wrongly assessed as low-risk. CONCLUSIONS: By introducing prediction models, based on logistic regression analyses, using variables obtained by standard EMD-questions on age, sex, medical history and symptomology, EMD prioritisation can be improved compared with using current criteria index-based ones. This will allow a more efficient emergency medical services resource allocation. BioMed Central 2022-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9080130/ /pubmed/35527302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01021-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Wibring, Kristoffer Lingman, Markus Herlitz, Johan Bång, Angela The potential of new prediction models for emergency medical dispatch prioritisation of patients with chest pain: a cohort study |
title | The potential of new prediction models for emergency medical dispatch prioritisation of patients with chest pain: a cohort study |
title_full | The potential of new prediction models for emergency medical dispatch prioritisation of patients with chest pain: a cohort study |
title_fullStr | The potential of new prediction models for emergency medical dispatch prioritisation of patients with chest pain: a cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The potential of new prediction models for emergency medical dispatch prioritisation of patients with chest pain: a cohort study |
title_short | The potential of new prediction models for emergency medical dispatch prioritisation of patients with chest pain: a cohort study |
title_sort | potential of new prediction models for emergency medical dispatch prioritisation of patients with chest pain: a cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9080130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35527302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01021-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wibringkristoffer thepotentialofnewpredictionmodelsforemergencymedicaldispatchprioritisationofpatientswithchestpainacohortstudy AT lingmanmarkus thepotentialofnewpredictionmodelsforemergencymedicaldispatchprioritisationofpatientswithchestpainacohortstudy AT herlitzjohan thepotentialofnewpredictionmodelsforemergencymedicaldispatchprioritisationofpatientswithchestpainacohortstudy AT bangangela thepotentialofnewpredictionmodelsforemergencymedicaldispatchprioritisationofpatientswithchestpainacohortstudy AT wibringkristoffer potentialofnewpredictionmodelsforemergencymedicaldispatchprioritisationofpatientswithchestpainacohortstudy AT lingmanmarkus potentialofnewpredictionmodelsforemergencymedicaldispatchprioritisationofpatientswithchestpainacohortstudy AT herlitzjohan potentialofnewpredictionmodelsforemergencymedicaldispatchprioritisationofpatientswithchestpainacohortstudy AT bangangela potentialofnewpredictionmodelsforemergencymedicaldispatchprioritisationofpatientswithchestpainacohortstudy |