Cargando…
Standardizing the measurement and classification of quality of life using the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ): the ABCDEF keratoconus classification
BACKGROUND: Measuring quality of life is of importance in keratoconus. So far, the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ) is the only keratoconus-specific scale to measure emotional well-being along with functional compromise in this population. Nevertheless, there is still a lack o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9080176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35526027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00288-0 |
_version_ | 1784702724801036288 |
---|---|
author | Balparda, Kepa Herrera-Chalarca, Tatiana Cano-Bustamante, Melissa |
author_facet | Balparda, Kepa Herrera-Chalarca, Tatiana Cano-Bustamante, Melissa |
author_sort | Balparda, Kepa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Measuring quality of life is of importance in keratoconus. So far, the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ) is the only keratoconus-specific scale to measure emotional well-being along with functional compromise in this population. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of clarity and standardization as to how KEPAQ scores should be computed and reported. There are also no guidelines for interpretation of classification of quality of life when using this instrument. The purpose of this study is to provide a specific framework on how to grade and classify keratoconus by using the KEPAQ and propose an extension of current classification to encompass subjective compromise. METHODS: A group of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of keratoconus underwent application of the KEPAQ. First, a Rasch modeling was performed to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of both sub-scales of the instrument. Then, a linear transformation was performed to turn data into a more relatable scale ranging from 0 to 100. Finally, by using Tukey’s Hinges, scores of the KEPAQ were divided in a 1-to-4 scale, allowing for an easy E&F classification system. RESULTS: A total of 386 applications of the KEPAQ were included. Analysis provided evidence of the KEPAQ being unidimensional, well-fitted to the Rasch Model, and provided adequate interval-level scores. Linear transformation resulted in a user-friendly final score ranging from 0 to 100, where a higher score translates to having a better quality of life. Two methods of easily computing final score, one by hand and the other one by an Excel file, were constructed. An E&F 1-to-4 classification was proposed, which may work well with the current ABCD classification of keratoconus. CONCLUSIONS: The KEPAQ is a psychometrically robust scale, which confidently measures both emotional-related and functional-related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. It can be easily computed, and the results are interpretable and classified in a manner similar to that used in the ABCD keratoconus classification, by adding letters ‘E’ for emotional and ‘F’ for functional compromise. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9080176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90801762022-05-09 Standardizing the measurement and classification of quality of life using the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ): the ABCDEF keratoconus classification Balparda, Kepa Herrera-Chalarca, Tatiana Cano-Bustamante, Melissa Eye Vis (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Measuring quality of life is of importance in keratoconus. So far, the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ) is the only keratoconus-specific scale to measure emotional well-being along with functional compromise in this population. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of clarity and standardization as to how KEPAQ scores should be computed and reported. There are also no guidelines for interpretation of classification of quality of life when using this instrument. The purpose of this study is to provide a specific framework on how to grade and classify keratoconus by using the KEPAQ and propose an extension of current classification to encompass subjective compromise. METHODS: A group of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of keratoconus underwent application of the KEPAQ. First, a Rasch modeling was performed to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of both sub-scales of the instrument. Then, a linear transformation was performed to turn data into a more relatable scale ranging from 0 to 100. Finally, by using Tukey’s Hinges, scores of the KEPAQ were divided in a 1-to-4 scale, allowing for an easy E&F classification system. RESULTS: A total of 386 applications of the KEPAQ were included. Analysis provided evidence of the KEPAQ being unidimensional, well-fitted to the Rasch Model, and provided adequate interval-level scores. Linear transformation resulted in a user-friendly final score ranging from 0 to 100, where a higher score translates to having a better quality of life. Two methods of easily computing final score, one by hand and the other one by an Excel file, were constructed. An E&F 1-to-4 classification was proposed, which may work well with the current ABCD classification of keratoconus. CONCLUSIONS: The KEPAQ is a psychometrically robust scale, which confidently measures both emotional-related and functional-related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. It can be easily computed, and the results are interpretable and classified in a manner similar to that used in the ABCD keratoconus classification, by adding letters ‘E’ for emotional and ‘F’ for functional compromise. BioMed Central 2022-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9080176/ /pubmed/35526027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00288-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Balparda, Kepa Herrera-Chalarca, Tatiana Cano-Bustamante, Melissa Standardizing the measurement and classification of quality of life using the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ): the ABCDEF keratoconus classification |
title | Standardizing the measurement and classification of quality of life using the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ): the ABCDEF keratoconus classification |
title_full | Standardizing the measurement and classification of quality of life using the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ): the ABCDEF keratoconus classification |
title_fullStr | Standardizing the measurement and classification of quality of life using the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ): the ABCDEF keratoconus classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Standardizing the measurement and classification of quality of life using the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ): the ABCDEF keratoconus classification |
title_short | Standardizing the measurement and classification of quality of life using the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ): the ABCDEF keratoconus classification |
title_sort | standardizing the measurement and classification of quality of life using the keratoconus end-points assessment questionnaire (kepaq): the abcdef keratoconus classification |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9080176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35526027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00288-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balpardakepa standardizingthemeasurementandclassificationofqualityoflifeusingthekeratoconusendpointsassessmentquestionnairekepaqtheabcdefkeratoconusclassification AT herrerachalarcatatiana standardizingthemeasurementandclassificationofqualityoflifeusingthekeratoconusendpointsassessmentquestionnairekepaqtheabcdefkeratoconusclassification AT canobustamantemelissa standardizingthemeasurementandclassificationofqualityoflifeusingthekeratoconusendpointsassessmentquestionnairekepaqtheabcdefkeratoconusclassification |