Cargando…

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques

PURPOSE: Anastomosis creation after resective gastrointestinal surgery is a crucial task. The present review examines the techniques and implants currently available for anastomosis creation and analyses to which extent they already address our clinical needs, with a special focus on their potential...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steger, Jana, Jell, Alissa, Ficht, Stefanie, Ostler, Daniel, Eblenkamp, Markus, Mela, Petra, Wilhelm, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9081039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35548666
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S335102
_version_ 1784702925299253248
author Steger, Jana
Jell, Alissa
Ficht, Stefanie
Ostler, Daniel
Eblenkamp, Markus
Mela, Petra
Wilhelm, Dirk
author_facet Steger, Jana
Jell, Alissa
Ficht, Stefanie
Ostler, Daniel
Eblenkamp, Markus
Mela, Petra
Wilhelm, Dirk
author_sort Steger, Jana
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Anastomosis creation after resective gastrointestinal surgery is a crucial task. The present review examines the techniques and implants currently available for anastomosis creation and analyses to which extent they already address our clinical needs, with a special focus on their potential to enable further trauma minimization in visceral surgery. METHODS: A multi-database research was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Comparative controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials dealing with anastomosis creation techniques in the intestinal tract in both German and English were included and statistically significant differences in postoperative complication incidences were assessed using the RevMan5.4 Review Manager (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). RESULTS: All methods and implant types were analyzed and compared with respect to four dimensions, assessing the techniques’ current performances and further potentials for surgical trauma reduction. Postoperative outcome measures, such as leakage, stenosis, reoperation and mortality rates, as well as the tendency to cause bleeding, wound infections, abscesses, anastomotic hemorrhages, pulmonary embolisms, and fistulas were assessed, revealing the only statistically significant superiority of hand-suture over stapling anastomoses with respect to the occurrence of obstructions. CONCLUSION: Based on the overall complication rates, it is concluded that none of the anastomosis systems addresses the demands of operative trauma minimization sufficiently yet. Major problems are furthermore either low standardization potentials due to dependence on the surgeons’ levels of experience, high force application requirements for the actual anastomosis creation, or large and rigid device designs interfering with flexibility demands and size restrictions of the body’s natural access routes. There is still a need for innovative technologies, especially with regard to enabling incisionless interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9081039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90810392022-05-10 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques Steger, Jana Jell, Alissa Ficht, Stefanie Ostler, Daniel Eblenkamp, Markus Mela, Petra Wilhelm, Dirk Ther Clin Risk Manag Review PURPOSE: Anastomosis creation after resective gastrointestinal surgery is a crucial task. The present review examines the techniques and implants currently available for anastomosis creation and analyses to which extent they already address our clinical needs, with a special focus on their potential to enable further trauma minimization in visceral surgery. METHODS: A multi-database research was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Comparative controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials dealing with anastomosis creation techniques in the intestinal tract in both German and English were included and statistically significant differences in postoperative complication incidences were assessed using the RevMan5.4 Review Manager (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). RESULTS: All methods and implant types were analyzed and compared with respect to four dimensions, assessing the techniques’ current performances and further potentials for surgical trauma reduction. Postoperative outcome measures, such as leakage, stenosis, reoperation and mortality rates, as well as the tendency to cause bleeding, wound infections, abscesses, anastomotic hemorrhages, pulmonary embolisms, and fistulas were assessed, revealing the only statistically significant superiority of hand-suture over stapling anastomoses with respect to the occurrence of obstructions. CONCLUSION: Based on the overall complication rates, it is concluded that none of the anastomosis systems addresses the demands of operative trauma minimization sufficiently yet. Major problems are furthermore either low standardization potentials due to dependence on the surgeons’ levels of experience, high force application requirements for the actual anastomosis creation, or large and rigid device designs interfering with flexibility demands and size restrictions of the body’s natural access routes. There is still a need for innovative technologies, especially with regard to enabling incisionless interventions. Dove 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9081039/ /pubmed/35548666 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S335102 Text en © 2022 Steger et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Steger, Jana
Jell, Alissa
Ficht, Stefanie
Ostler, Daniel
Eblenkamp, Markus
Mela, Petra
Wilhelm, Dirk
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques
title Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques
title_full Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques
title_fullStr Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques
title_short Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis on colorectal anastomotic techniques
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9081039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35548666
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S335102
work_keys_str_mv AT stegerjana systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoncolorectalanastomotictechniques
AT jellalissa systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoncolorectalanastomotictechniques
AT fichtstefanie systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoncolorectalanastomotictechniques
AT ostlerdaniel systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoncolorectalanastomotictechniques
AT eblenkampmarkus systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoncolorectalanastomotictechniques
AT melapetra systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoncolorectalanastomotictechniques
AT wilhelmdirk systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoncolorectalanastomotictechniques