Cargando…

The mutual effects between macrophages and cartilage templates in the process of subcutaneous endochondral bone formation

The interplay between implants and the recipient immune environment is key to the long-term effectiveness of bone tissue engineering. In this study, we aimed to investigate the mutual effects between macrophages and cartilage templates in the process of subcutaneous osteogenesis. Primary mice bone m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Jing, Zhou, Yi, Wang, Yan, Cai, Xinjie, Wang, Yining
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9081772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35540265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra04463e
_version_ 1784703064846893056
author Huang, Jing
Zhou, Yi
Wang, Yan
Cai, Xinjie
Wang, Yining
author_facet Huang, Jing
Zhou, Yi
Wang, Yan
Cai, Xinjie
Wang, Yining
author_sort Huang, Jing
collection PubMed
description The interplay between implants and the recipient immune environment is key to the long-term effectiveness of bone tissue engineering. In this study, we aimed to investigate the mutual effects between macrophages and cartilage templates in the process of subcutaneous osteogenesis. Primary mice bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were seeded into gelatin sponge and chondrogenically cultured for 4 weeks in vitro to form cartilage templates. The constructs were then implanted subcutaneously in monocyte-depleted mice or normal C57BL/6 mice. Implants harvested at two months showed inferior osteogenic quality in monocyte-depleted mice compared with that of normal mice. In normal mice, the cartilage templates recruited a high ratio of alternatively activated macrophages (CAM or M2) to classically activated macrophages (AAM or M1), compared with empty sponge. In vitro co-culture assay of macrophages with cartilage templates also showed that the cartilage templates polarized macrophages to the M2 phenotype and that these effects were even stronger than those of primary BMSCs. In turn, the co-culture of polarized macrophages with cartilage templates showed that compared to M0 or M2, M1 significantly increased the expressions of osteogenic and angiogenic markers of cartilage templates. These data suggested that macrophages seem to be indispensable in the osteogenesis of cartilage templates and that cartilage templates have a favorable immunomodulatory ability to polarize macrophages to the M2 phenotype. M1 was the contributing phenotype of macrophages that promoted the osteogenesis and angiogenesis of cartilage templates. Macrophages and cartilage templates cooperate to achieve endochondral bone formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9081772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90817722022-05-09 The mutual effects between macrophages and cartilage templates in the process of subcutaneous endochondral bone formation Huang, Jing Zhou, Yi Wang, Yan Cai, Xinjie Wang, Yining RSC Adv Chemistry The interplay between implants and the recipient immune environment is key to the long-term effectiveness of bone tissue engineering. In this study, we aimed to investigate the mutual effects between macrophages and cartilage templates in the process of subcutaneous osteogenesis. Primary mice bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were seeded into gelatin sponge and chondrogenically cultured for 4 weeks in vitro to form cartilage templates. The constructs were then implanted subcutaneously in monocyte-depleted mice or normal C57BL/6 mice. Implants harvested at two months showed inferior osteogenic quality in monocyte-depleted mice compared with that of normal mice. In normal mice, the cartilage templates recruited a high ratio of alternatively activated macrophages (CAM or M2) to classically activated macrophages (AAM or M1), compared with empty sponge. In vitro co-culture assay of macrophages with cartilage templates also showed that the cartilage templates polarized macrophages to the M2 phenotype and that these effects were even stronger than those of primary BMSCs. In turn, the co-culture of polarized macrophages with cartilage templates showed that compared to M0 or M2, M1 significantly increased the expressions of osteogenic and angiogenic markers of cartilage templates. These data suggested that macrophages seem to be indispensable in the osteogenesis of cartilage templates and that cartilage templates have a favorable immunomodulatory ability to polarize macrophages to the M2 phenotype. M1 was the contributing phenotype of macrophages that promoted the osteogenesis and angiogenesis of cartilage templates. Macrophages and cartilage templates cooperate to achieve endochondral bone formation. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9081772/ /pubmed/35540265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra04463e Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Huang, Jing
Zhou, Yi
Wang, Yan
Cai, Xinjie
Wang, Yining
The mutual effects between macrophages and cartilage templates in the process of subcutaneous endochondral bone formation
title The mutual effects between macrophages and cartilage templates in the process of subcutaneous endochondral bone formation
title_full The mutual effects between macrophages and cartilage templates in the process of subcutaneous endochondral bone formation
title_fullStr The mutual effects between macrophages and cartilage templates in the process of subcutaneous endochondral bone formation
title_full_unstemmed The mutual effects between macrophages and cartilage templates in the process of subcutaneous endochondral bone formation
title_short The mutual effects between macrophages and cartilage templates in the process of subcutaneous endochondral bone formation
title_sort mutual effects between macrophages and cartilage templates in the process of subcutaneous endochondral bone formation
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9081772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35540265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra04463e
work_keys_str_mv AT huangjing themutualeffectsbetweenmacrophagesandcartilagetemplatesintheprocessofsubcutaneousendochondralboneformation
AT zhouyi themutualeffectsbetweenmacrophagesandcartilagetemplatesintheprocessofsubcutaneousendochondralboneformation
AT wangyan themutualeffectsbetweenmacrophagesandcartilagetemplatesintheprocessofsubcutaneousendochondralboneformation
AT caixinjie themutualeffectsbetweenmacrophagesandcartilagetemplatesintheprocessofsubcutaneousendochondralboneformation
AT wangyining themutualeffectsbetweenmacrophagesandcartilagetemplatesintheprocessofsubcutaneousendochondralboneformation
AT huangjing mutualeffectsbetweenmacrophagesandcartilagetemplatesintheprocessofsubcutaneousendochondralboneformation
AT zhouyi mutualeffectsbetweenmacrophagesandcartilagetemplatesintheprocessofsubcutaneousendochondralboneformation
AT wangyan mutualeffectsbetweenmacrophagesandcartilagetemplatesintheprocessofsubcutaneousendochondralboneformation
AT caixinjie mutualeffectsbetweenmacrophagesandcartilagetemplatesintheprocessofsubcutaneousendochondralboneformation
AT wangyining mutualeffectsbetweenmacrophagesandcartilagetemplatesintheprocessofsubcutaneousendochondralboneformation