Cargando…

Effect of Arm Movement and Task Difficulty on Balance Performance in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that restricted compared to free arm movement negatively affects balance performance during balance assessment and this is reinforced when the level of task difficulty (e.g., varying stance/walk conditions, sensory manipulations) is increased. However, it remains uncle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muehlbauer, Thomas, Hill, Mathew W., Heise, Joana, Abel, Leander, Schumann, Ina, Brueckner, Dennis, Schedler, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9082151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547198
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.854823
_version_ 1784703145571516416
author Muehlbauer, Thomas
Hill, Mathew W.
Heise, Joana
Abel, Leander
Schumann, Ina
Brueckner, Dennis
Schedler, Simon
author_facet Muehlbauer, Thomas
Hill, Mathew W.
Heise, Joana
Abel, Leander
Schumann, Ina
Brueckner, Dennis
Schedler, Simon
author_sort Muehlbauer, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that restricted compared to free arm movement negatively affects balance performance during balance assessment and this is reinforced when the level of task difficulty (e.g., varying stance/walk conditions, sensory manipulations) is increased. However, it remains unclear whether these findings apply to individuals with differences in the development of the postural control system. Thus, we examined the influence of arm movement and task difficulty on balance performance in children, adolescents, and young adults. METHODS: Static, dynamic, and proactive balance performance were assessed in 40 children (11.5 ± 0.6 years), 30 adolescents (14.0 ± 1.1 years), and 41 young adults (24.7 ± 3.0 years) using the same standardized balance tests [i.e., one-legged stance (OLS) time with eyes opened/closed and/or on firm/foam ground, 3-m beam (width: 6, 4.5, or 3 cm) walking backward step number, Lower Quarter Y-Balance test (YBT-LQ) reach distance] with various difficulty levels under free vs. restricted arm movement conditions. RESULTS: In all but one test, balance performance was significantly better during free compared to restricted arm movement. Arm by age interactions were only observed for the YBT-LQ and post hoc analyses revealed significantly greater performance differences between free and restricted arm movement, especially, in young adults. Arm by age by task difficulty interactions were found for the OLS and the 3-m beam walking backward test. Post hoc analyses showed significantly greater performance differences between free and restricted arm movement during high vs. low levels of task difficulty and this was more pronounced in children and adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of age, static, dynamic, and proactive balance performance benefited from arm movements and this was especially noted for youth performing difficult balance tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9082151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90821512022-05-10 Effect of Arm Movement and Task Difficulty on Balance Performance in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Muehlbauer, Thomas Hill, Mathew W. Heise, Joana Abel, Leander Schumann, Ina Brueckner, Dennis Schedler, Simon Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that restricted compared to free arm movement negatively affects balance performance during balance assessment and this is reinforced when the level of task difficulty (e.g., varying stance/walk conditions, sensory manipulations) is increased. However, it remains unclear whether these findings apply to individuals with differences in the development of the postural control system. Thus, we examined the influence of arm movement and task difficulty on balance performance in children, adolescents, and young adults. METHODS: Static, dynamic, and proactive balance performance were assessed in 40 children (11.5 ± 0.6 years), 30 adolescents (14.0 ± 1.1 years), and 41 young adults (24.7 ± 3.0 years) using the same standardized balance tests [i.e., one-legged stance (OLS) time with eyes opened/closed and/or on firm/foam ground, 3-m beam (width: 6, 4.5, or 3 cm) walking backward step number, Lower Quarter Y-Balance test (YBT-LQ) reach distance] with various difficulty levels under free vs. restricted arm movement conditions. RESULTS: In all but one test, balance performance was significantly better during free compared to restricted arm movement. Arm by age interactions were only observed for the YBT-LQ and post hoc analyses revealed significantly greater performance differences between free and restricted arm movement, especially, in young adults. Arm by age by task difficulty interactions were found for the OLS and the 3-m beam walking backward test. Post hoc analyses showed significantly greater performance differences between free and restricted arm movement during high vs. low levels of task difficulty and this was more pronounced in children and adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of age, static, dynamic, and proactive balance performance benefited from arm movements and this was especially noted for youth performing difficult balance tasks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9082151/ /pubmed/35547198 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.854823 Text en Copyright © 2022 Muehlbauer, Hill, Heise, Abel, Schumann, Brueckner and Schedler. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Muehlbauer, Thomas
Hill, Mathew W.
Heise, Joana
Abel, Leander
Schumann, Ina
Brueckner, Dennis
Schedler, Simon
Effect of Arm Movement and Task Difficulty on Balance Performance in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults
title Effect of Arm Movement and Task Difficulty on Balance Performance in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults
title_full Effect of Arm Movement and Task Difficulty on Balance Performance in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults
title_fullStr Effect of Arm Movement and Task Difficulty on Balance Performance in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Arm Movement and Task Difficulty on Balance Performance in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults
title_short Effect of Arm Movement and Task Difficulty on Balance Performance in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults
title_sort effect of arm movement and task difficulty on balance performance in children, adolescents, and young adults
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9082151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547198
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.854823
work_keys_str_mv AT muehlbauerthomas effectofarmmovementandtaskdifficultyonbalanceperformanceinchildrenadolescentsandyoungadults
AT hillmatheww effectofarmmovementandtaskdifficultyonbalanceperformanceinchildrenadolescentsandyoungadults
AT heisejoana effectofarmmovementandtaskdifficultyonbalanceperformanceinchildrenadolescentsandyoungadults
AT abelleander effectofarmmovementandtaskdifficultyonbalanceperformanceinchildrenadolescentsandyoungadults
AT schumannina effectofarmmovementandtaskdifficultyonbalanceperformanceinchildrenadolescentsandyoungadults
AT bruecknerdennis effectofarmmovementandtaskdifficultyonbalanceperformanceinchildrenadolescentsandyoungadults
AT schedlersimon effectofarmmovementandtaskdifficultyonbalanceperformanceinchildrenadolescentsandyoungadults